Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:35:17 -0400
On 24 Aug 2005 18:13:16 -0700, "Potte" <photonmanual@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>He belief is like the ancient. Everything is maya,
>everything is illusion... save the particles which
>Traveler believe is real. But QM says particles are
>not what we think it is.
QM physicists have no clue as to what a particle is. I believe all
particles come from nothing and are made of nothing. Nothing is
everything and everything is nothing. That is to say, if you add them
all up (positive and negative) you get nothing. The conservation of
nothing is the mother of all conservation principles. Motion (change)
is nature's way of correcting a temporary violation in the
conservation of nothing.
Yin and Yang is the key to it all. It must be balanced.
> So everything could be illusion.
No. Everything is not an illusion. Certainly, what we see is not what
is "out there". What we see is "in there" (in our minds). Although it
is certainly affected by what is out there. One must use one's mind's
eye (reason and logic) to discern what is really out there. This
requires an extreme amount of painstaking honesty, patience and
courage. It thas nothing to do with genius. Just eliminate all
contradictions and follow the logic wherever it leads.
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- References:
- Traveler - Insane or Genius?
- From: Potte
- Traveler - Insane or Genius?
- Prev by Date: Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
- Next by Date: Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
- Next by thread: Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|