The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape

A planetary science is well established.

And the means of calculation was determined
emperically. A consistent and evident error
arose.

And to define it theoretically is to simply
announce its existence as necessary.

A certain variable was added.

An exact location is quite evident. A variable
of potential energy effect.

A body will cause the existence.

And orbital mechanics often deals with
small bodies effected by the larger.

An escape velocity for the sun is
calculable, just like the earth's.

And the question become the correct
orbit to steal energy from Jupiter.

Any old orbit will loose energy, but
somebody discovered the perfect spot.

And in this location the rate of
acceleration caused by Jupiter itself
is less than the deceleration caused
by the sun.

A very wide orbit of Jupiter is required
to add.

A question becomes the general theory
of relativity and its application.

Common sense where one body always
slows appears to be contridicted by the
Jupiter escape boost.

And so the orbit is to be applied to
a sun. A wide path is followed where
the planet is always decelerating like the sun.

Except apon a certain passage the time
lost on approach was to never reappear,
just like the approach to the sun.

An apparent dilemma of General Relativity.

How can the wide orbit not loose while the
close in orbit captures or truely looses?

And here the distinction becomes the
lessening of the sun's escape velocity.

As the tradeoff is made, the lower orbit
to escape appears.

In relation to the sun the velocity decreases
during the Jupiter escape boost.

But the lower escape velocity, is to only
be found on this path.

And the cause is the extended loss.

A longer path near the combined mass of the
sun and jupiter is held in relation to the
longer path anywhere further away.

And to travel further in absolute solar orbit
terms is the path on the opposite side.

An escape path is then always best to accelerate
to the mass escaped from.

Expend rocket gas toward the body.

And here is the difference in suborbital
mechanics versus orbital mechanics.

A planet to escape from is jupiter no matter
where the earth is located.

And so if there is a chance at burning
fuel toward Jupiter then the orbit
will be suborbital escape.

If there is no fuel left to burn the orbit
has been achieved and the Jupiter
escape will be an orbital escape.

And here is the effect mentioned at the
beginning. Acceleration deviates toward
or away from the mass differently.

A free moving body has no time loss
effect of General Relativity.

And the acceleration of gravity itself
is not the acceleration of orbital
mechanics.

Burning fuel is required.

And to capture is always the effect
of the planet caused time loss, except if
what?

A mass differential is effected on the
rocket.

Yes, the changing mass of the body will
alter the sign of the time loss.

And the exact relation is discovered.

A sign of lost time will appear gained time
for the body not in acceleration.

A resolved relativity predicts the sign
of the twin paradox apparent as the
question Einstein could not quit
solve.

A sign change in reality for the body
that truely left the center of mass
as a rocket and returned. A twin
in the rocket truely reappears younger!

It is not a paradox, it is real.

And the suborbital escape can be tight to
Jupiter for this separate reason.

And the orbital escape from the solar system
is of course the burn opposite the side of the
sun Jupiter is on until the escape orbit itself
is defined as the minimum escape orbit for two
bodies.

And here the return to the Jupiter side of the solar
system is seen, and the boost is only the escape
path boost. An apparent boost only.

A fairly wide path prevents the capture by the
sun or by Jupiter, but in relation to the
earths orbit the path looks close to Jupiter
always.

A minimum escape orbit is the typical
boost escape using Jupiter.

And that is the story of how Jupiter
resolves relativity with experimental
orbits.

Two relativistic effects can be applied
to Jupiter.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Two suns
    ... it would orbit faster than Jupiter does (by a factor of the ... days Earth took to make one complete orbit, ... Sun2 will be moving faster than Jupiter does, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Two suns
    ... would orbit faster than Jupiter does (by a factor of the square ... root of two, I think). ... is the sun than ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Dark matter
    ... u is g*because is not sinificantly differnt from ... r is the the distance of the circular orbit ... V to escape = sqrtmathematically this is a mininum speed. ... EV is escape velocity. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: C
    ... |> orbit because you don't need to 'clock' a car for an hour to know ... |> oranges, straw man. ... Dividing 43 arc-seconds per century by ... |> There is no mention of Jupiter or any other planet in Einstein's ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Two suns
    ... To shift the position of the orbit, ... zero, after all, because that would mean the sun would stand still. ... would orbit faster than Jupiter does (by a factor of the square root ... I assume you don't mean a planet year of 400 days, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
Loading