Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher <bjoern.feuerbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 14:47:41 +0200
tony fleming wrote:
i notice a lovely quiet coming from a certain direction;
Hey, I was not online on the weekend. BFD.
so i guess someone is beginning to understand the REALITY of self-field theory (or they're away still) and the fact that it IS both mathematically and from the physics a quantized field. hence we don't ASSUME a discrete fourier maths, but find it INNATE to our Maxwell-lorentz eigensolutions.
You guessed wrong.
[snip rant]
Bye, Bjoern .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- References:
- SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- From: tony fleming
- SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- Prev by Date: Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- Next by Date: Re: Entropy question
- Previous by thread: Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- Next by thread: Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
- Index(es):