Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields

the hydrogen paper is to be published next month in physics essays. the
paper is much the same as can be downloaded at www.unifiedphysics.com.
i guess those who have invested years of study and effort to QFT will
like bjeorn, be absolutely hostile to any advances in our mathematical
and physical knowledge. as i say the proof of the SFT method is in the
pudding, those who don't want to see will not be shown by me or anyone
else; as is found in the good book, "there's none so blind, as those
who will not see".

actually the SFT method is quite straightforward, and follows QFT quite
closely, and as i've said ad neaseum (thanks, autymn), the analogy
between the finite element method (FEM) which employs langrangian
density functions and shape functions to numerically solve partial
differential equations (PDE's), and the finite difference method (FDM)
which uses suitable trial functions variables directly to a set of
PDE's, is a very good one; i can only suggest anyone seriously wanting
to use SFT, should study these numerical methods. they really do give
a good rationale to SFT and QFT, and the advantages of both; although
as i have also said ad neaseum, QFT uses the old COULOMB-LIKE fields of
the classical physics, and this induces an innacurcy.which we currently
know as heisenberg uncertainty principle.

i will introduce a new thread soon on the centre-of-motion fields used
by SFT and why they are an advantage over the old coulomb-like fields
of QFT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SFT and entanglement
    ... circles and ellipses, it can be as numerical as QFT, ... SFT will be able to calculate actual MOTIONS ... do you understand the significance of this next to QFT? ... better understanding of physics don't you? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: why cant fields be quantized too?
    ... > you were born) researching about Quantum Field Theory, QCD, ... > will publish the 'corrected' enhanced version in Physics ... actually means in physics before claiming that QFT is wrong! ... > failure by physicists to find a mathematics based directly on ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: why cant fields be quantized too?
    ... >> Physics said the energy levels of fields are quantized ... you were born) researching about Quantum Field Theory, QCD, ... SFT fields as we shall see. ... But why can't the potentials give us a correct picture of the E- ...
    (sci.physics)
  • A theoretical physics FAQ
    ... Of course, the FAQ refers only to a tiny part of theoretical physics, ... What are 'bare' and 'dressed' particles? ... Why does QFT look so different from QM? ... Is quantum mechanics compatible with general relativity? ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Relativistic QM
    ... Some differences between QM and QFT are reported in QFT textbooks. ... QED is indeed "compatible" with QM, in that for observations within their common domain they predict outcomes identical to within measurement resolutions. ... As I have remarked before, it is subtle to compare different theories of physics, with different domains of applicability. ... As you have said before, there is no RIGOROUS limit from GR to Newtonian gravitation, because you insist on an EXACTLY flat spatial submanifold. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading