Re: Relativity question.
- From: "Mark Martin" <qed100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 20:30:05 -0700
Albion wrote:
> As I understand it, the faster I accelerate myself the slower time for
> me moves as compared to an observer I left behind. Andromeda my be 2
> million light years away but at higher and higher speeds accelerated to
> I could get there in no time at all, but it would still be two million
> years for the observer I left on earth. I also understand that if you
> travel in a strait line eventually you will come back to where you
> started. So given that, I could accelerate myself to some minute
> fraction under the speed of light then coast and return to the place I
> left in a few seconds. To the observer I left behind billions and
> billions of years may have past making the universe to him that much
> older but to me the universe would only be a few seconds older. How can
> the universe be two different ages when I arrive back? Does
> decelerating myself to the original speed I started at cause time to
> speed up that much? Am I actually accelerating myself again to get back
> to the speed of the original observer?
Both the "observer" and the universe at large will be equally older
when you finally return. The observer will have been dead for
millennia, many stars will have exhausted their nuclear fuel, galaxies
will have undergone whole rotations.
-Mark Martin
.
- References:
- Relativity question.
- From: Albion
- Relativity question.
- Prev by Date: Relativity question.
- Next by Date: Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
- Previous by thread: Relativity question.
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity question.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|