Re: magnetic monopoles



Jay R. Yablon wrote:

Ken S. Tucker Wrote:

My very coarse understanding of Jay and Fredi's
paper (Fredifizzx quoted) is creating a particle
with similiar characteristics but very microscopic.

The inter loop repulsive forces in thier case
being offset by a Strong Nuclear Force that
requires a certain mass/energy to do so, like
a supergravity or quark attraction.

A remarkable prediction of the Yablon et al paper
is the numerical mass where such a monopole may
exist! The paper contains higher levels of
conservation too, but does have that prediction.

In juxtaposition to Yablon's monopole paper, by
using a macroscopic demo example above, I see
the paper in accord with known physical laws,
that is to say, Maxwell and GR look ok to me
in that microscopic scenario.

It may be that a magnetic monopole's equation of
motion is identical with a charged particle.

Regards
Ken S. Tucker



Good shot, Ken.

I am presently calculating widths and cross sections for the magnetic monopole interactions described in my paper at http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, and have come to realize that as a Fermion, the magnetic monopole does not appear to be a "different" particle from the electron or the up and down quarks (the neutrino of course has no electromagnetic interactions), but rather, is a different way in which the known electron, up and down fermions interact. So I would have to agree with your sense that "a magnetic monopole's equation of motion is identical with a charged particle." Because a magnetic monopole *IS* a charged particle, but with a different interaction than we have seen before.

The ~2.35 TeV mass I predicted is the mass of a vector boson which mediates the magnetic monopole interactions of electrons and quarks. The current which interacts with this ~2.35 TeV vector boson, per my paper, closely resembles the electroweak neutral current, equation (5.14). I just tonight calculated a full width for this vector boson at a whopping 98.6 TeV.

In the next few days I hope to calculate the cross sections also, and will post those as soon as I have double-checked them and am sure they are right. Then the folks at the Tevatron and LHC, etc. can go to town in the TeV range.

Best,

Jay.

By your own words it isn't a magnetic monopole. What you describe more resembles my Weber-like description of the electron, in which the field of the electron is neither electrostatic nor magnetic, but something of both.

By magnetic monopole I take it that you mean "a particle that will always be attracted by one magnetic pole of a hard magnet, but repelled by the other pole. Is this your understanding as well, or am I misinformed?

Richard Perry


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: magnetic monopoles
    ... >> My very coarse understanding of Jay and Fredi's ... > electromagnetic interactions), but rather, is a different way in which the ... > known electron, ... > the magnetic monopole interactions of electrons and quarks. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction
    ... >>there is a particle B nearby. ... I don't want to construct a theory in which electron mass is ... OK, we have three interactions to consider, E&M, the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction
    ... >> From the point of view of particle A the direction to the particle B is ... >>I don't want to construct a theory in which electron mass is ... >>I neglect weak and strong interactions. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: magnetic monopoles
    ... > motion is identical with a charged particle. ... the magnetic monopole does not appear to be a "different" particle ... electromagnetic interactions), but rather, is a different way in which the ... known electron, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: magnetic monopoles
    ... |> monopole interactions described in my paper at ... |> known electron, ... |> the magnetic monopole interactions of electrons and quarks. ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading