Re: magnetic monopoles

"Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125466299.188780.303910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| RP wrote:
| > Ken S. Tucker wrote:
| >
| > > Hi Rich et al...
| > >
| > > RP wrote:
| > >
| > >>Autymn D. C. wrote:
| > >>
| > >>
| > >>>RP, stop using creationist circular arguments. It calls for a
source
| > >>>magnetism and a curled electric field, fool.
| > >>>
| > >>>-Aut
| > >>
| > >>What's so difficult to understand about "A magnetic pole is a
| > >>*perspective* of a magnetic field". I guess it's true, everything
is
| > >>quantized in the form of point particles, even opinions it would
seem.
| > >>Strange universe we live in, that is, according to the science
fiction
| > >>fanatics posing as theoretical physicists.
| > >>
| > >>Richard Perry
| > >
| > >
| > > Suppose I tried to build a magnetic monopole
| > > using wedge shaped bar magnets, that before
| > > being magnetized they all fitted into a sphere
| > > shape.
| > > So I magnetize the segments so the outer surfaces
| > > are North and get out my crazy glue and reassemble
| > > them so all North's are outward facing.
| > >
| > > Likewise I could build more North and South
| > > sphere's.
| > >
| > > ?Is that possible to do, and duplicate a magnetic
| > > monopole macroscopically?
| > >
| > > ((Playing billards with them would be a real
| > > hoot)).
| > >
| > > Ken S. Tucker
| >
| > Hi Ken. I suspect you already know the answer to that question. Just
in
| > case it's "Hell no". What you'll get is no external field at all.
| >
| > Richard Perry
|
| Hi Rich...yes
| I studied that many moons ago, however, a review
| and retest in view of Yablon's prediction is
| reasonable. Let me do a macro scenario...
|
| I start with a 2" que ball and drill in 1/4" dia
| holes a 1/2" deep, spaced a 1/2" apart and place
| into those holes cylindrical bar magnets with N
| pointed out. I could do the same using S pointed
| out.
|
| Irrespective of the orientation of those balls on
| a pool table the N's will repel the N's and the
| N's will attract the S's, but by the 1/r^3 rule.
|
| Does that sound reasonable?

Hey Ken,

Well, if there is no external field, how would they attract or repel?
But you figure up real close there might be some attraction or
repulsion. But this does seem like a macro scenario for field
confinement. Very interesting.

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps

http://www.vacuum-physics.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Electro-London Inertia
    ... FrediFizzx wrote: ... > | Sue... ... > | magnets in space and time. ... Ken S. Tucker ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: magnetic monopoles
    ... >> Ken S. Tucker ... I start with a 2" que ball and drill in 1/4" dia ... into those holes cylindrical bar magnets with N ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: magnetmotor
    ... If one allows both magnets to pivot a certain coupling ensues; ... where your PPM has problems is that the wheels spin ... simply attract one another, and the wheel will stop. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Stacking repelling magnets
    ... some of which repel other magnets, and some will attract. ... This is simple physics. ... i do not take time reading a book to know "basics" ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Stacking repelling magnets
    ... some of which repel other magnets, and some will attract. ... This is simple physics. ... Go purchase a good physics textbook, ...
    (sci.physics)