Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: "2ndPostulateDude" <cadwgan_gedrych@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 13:09:24 -0700
PD wrote:
> There you go thinking that there is a "true" physical
> rhythm to a clock and a "true" physical length to a rod.
> Tell me, how do you measure the true physical length of
> a rod?
If SR cannot do that, then SR cannot measure even
relative speeds correctly (because true rod length
is needed in order to do that).
--
2nd Postulate Dude
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: PD
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: PD
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- References:
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: 2ndPostulateDude
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: 2ndPostulateDude
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- From: PD
- Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- Prev by Date: Re: Using Small High-RPM Motors for Large Load?
- Next by Date: Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- Previous by thread: Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- Next by thread: Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|