Re: Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?


Autymn D. C. wrote:
> You're thinking of supersummetric and technicolor matter and their
> universes. Ignore the dumb scientist.
>
> -Aut

Thanks, sounds like great mind fodder.

One of the universal truths I hold is that nature(God) chooses the most
simplest method available (conservation of energy). You only have too
look at the Fibonacci sequence with the spiral and it's association
with the Golden Ratio.

Other clues can be seen with cellular automaton's like the simplest
LIFE, following a few rules it displays complex behaviour. Another
fantastic insight is the program (BOIDS) that uncovers how birds
actually fly.

If God is the architect of our universe, then it would certainly set in
place the most simplest methods to attain the best results.

I do have a problem when physicists use over-complicated theories. The
Physicists New Clothes with these theories sown in, cherishing their
cleverness in understanding to the detriment of further exploration.
What happens if another great genius like Newton or Einstein comes
along, totally wiping out what was previously held true. Would the
physicists community welcome or ridicule?

E=mc2 is one of the simplest equations, but some physicists seem blind
to the fact that there could be a God. Einstein didn't come to this
planet by accident, being at a place at the right time to overthrow the
orthodox is just way to convenient for the future of humanity. Science
is just like any religion becoming entrenched in it's own ideology.

I think any genius or great mind on this planet will be open to
numerous possibilities, just like a child letting their imagination
soar unfettered by the decrees of society and the greater
establishments. So we all must be like children willing to explore and
discover truths that could be at odds with the current beliefs, not
being scared to express viewpoints that could incur wrath from others.

.