Re: A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Electrostatic force
- From: "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Sep 2005 11:36:40 -0700
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I have created a web site which re-posts my Theory of Everything and it
> also includes separate supporting articles from previous usenet
> posting. This will be updated from time to time as it gets developed.
> See it at:
>
> http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html
>
> This is, of course, only the barest of models
Well, it's good you didn't try to flesh it out further because there
are problems associated with it even at the barest level.
"The fundamental building blocks of the universe consist only of the
proton and electron. Bound together, these form a neutral neutrino-like
particle. This particle fills all of empty space and makes up the
aether of empty space. It can be thought of as a matrix of alternating
protons and electrons and forms a crystal structure like salt (NaCl).
Electromagnetic waves travel through the crystal neutrino sea."
1. The proton is known not to be a fundamental building block since the
mid-60s. We know at the very least that it is composed of quarks and
gluons. This is verified from high-energy particle experiments in which
the quarks and gluons are extracted from the incident colliding
protons. This structure is *certainly* smaller than the structure you
imply with the simple cubic structure of the neutrino sea, and so these
same experiments would have easily been able to discern the proposed
structure, and they do not.
2. The only forces which bind together the proton and the electron are
the weak interaction and the electromagnetic interaction. Neither of
these interactions are strong enough to bind them together tightly
enough to form a neutrino (either to match experimental constraints on
dimensions or on bound state mass).
3. Neutrinos never, ever decay into a proton and an electron, even when
struck at high energy.
4. If a medium underlies a wave, then the elements of the medium need
intercoupling, and it is in fact this intercoupling that enters into
the constants that drive the wave equation. In this case, neutrinos
cannot comprise the medium underlying electromagnetic waves, because
neutrinos have been shown to not interact electromagnetically.
5. The lattice unit in NaCl has a measurable dipole moment. The
neutrino does not. Note that a dipole moment does *not* require that
have enough resolution to spatially resolve the two charges in the
dipole, because the field a large distance from the dipole expresses
the structure of the dipole. It is this fact that is instrumental in
the process of NaCl dissolution in a polar solvent (i.e. forming a
solution in water).
6. Protons have a nonzero quantum number called baryon number. In any
interaction that a proton undergoes, baryon number is strictly and
always conserved in every experiment conducted (including some tests
that effectively ruled out a likelihood of violation to less than one
occurence in 10^25 years!), and any composite that consists of protons
has a baryon number that is the sum of the baryon numbers of its
components. The baryon number of a neutrino is experimentally zero.
7. If electromagnetic waves traveled through a neutrino sea, then the
earth's motion through this sea would vary by time of day, by latitude,
and by season. This variation was experimentally ruled out by the
Michelson-Morley experiment, as well as a slew of others that followed.
8. Neutrinos are observed to break spatial parity almost maximally.
Protons and electrons do not, nor does a simple cubic lattice of
protons and electrons such as you propose.
Since the barest of models fails to match up with a number of
experimental observations, the model must be abandoned with dispatch.
It's recommended that the author learn quite a bit more about what is
known experimentally before trying to develop a model to explain those
observations.
Intuition does not a theory make.
PD
> but you might find it
> amusing if you're interested in finding ways to intuitively weave
> together various physical phenonmenon.
> fhutoe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: ISS FUBAR to cook
- Next by Date: Re: A Hole through Earth?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Ele...
- Next by thread: Re: A Theory of Everything that explains Gravity, Magnetisim, Electrostatic force
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
