Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- From: "OsherD" <mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Sep 2005 00:08:10 -0700
>>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx
If the universe starts out with low control of forces directionally and
increasingly develops it, and if the previous model C1 is correct, then
we might have an explanation for both the genetic code and what I've
called the universe code as the concatenation of dimensions M1, M2, M3,
L1, L2, L3, T1, T2, T3, F1 and or F2 (see my previous threads).
The universe arguably has a built-in "triple-direction" control
mechanism which takes time to develop "facility at using". This
accounts for the triples in the genetic code and universal code which
are almost universally present. In this sense, spacetime of 3 + 1
dimensions is "fundamental" - it's what control of forces is most
directed toward, although forces and masses and other relevant
dimensions originate in higher dimensions.
When the universe develops facility at controlling forces in different
directions, it simulates expansion of a sphere which is arguably the
simplest expansion in different directions. With "unification" of
forces' control, its expansion arguably accelerates. This would
explain the latest (5-6 billion years ago?) expansion.
So where did the original inflationary expansion come from early in the
universe, in contrast to this later expansion? The universe may have
simply been developing its control, or it may not have been spherical,
or it may have been subject to forces from a late stage singularity in
another dimension! Let's look at it this way: as the universe gets
more and more control over its forces and accelerates, it arguably
focuses its forces. Singularities including black holes also focus
their forces in a sense of "tearing apart" tidal forces, but they're
arguably uncontrolled. But what if a sufficiently strong controlled
focus of forces "punches through" to create a new baby universe which
is uncontrolled because of its new environment and its internal
changes? The Big Crunch doesn't require contraction of the universe -
it really should be called the Big Punch!
Next question :>)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- From: OsherD
- Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- References:
- Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- From: OsherD
- Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- From: OsherD
- Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- Prev by Date: Re: Curshing a planet into a black hole.
- Next by Date: Re: Rebuilding the levees in New Orleans
- Previous by thread: Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- Next by thread: Re: Hole/Handle Invariants Via Probable Influence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|