Re: Single photon location
- From: "Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:44:53 GMT
"Orion" <danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126422458.680705.41210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| The problem with this theory is redshift. If light is really a wave
| which propagates at a constant speed then space must be expanding.
|
If you stand under your bathroom shower and turn it on, you will get wet
and I will not.
If a bathroom shower is placed at the top of a tall building and turned
on, a lot of people on the sidewalk will get just a little bit wet.
The inverse square law means the droplets are scattered.
The Hubble constant (redshift as a function of distance) means
the droplets are reshaped and expanded.
There is no evidence of expanding space, no evidence of any big bang,
there is evidence of widely scattered and expanding photons.
Androcles.
.
- References:
- Single photon location
- From: rt987
- Re: Single photon location
- From: Orion
- Single photon location
- Prev by Date: Re: Aristotle and the Assumption of Truth
- Next by Date: Re: How does a Stirling Cryogenerator Work?
- Previous by thread: Re: Single photon location
- Next by thread: Re: Single photon location
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|