Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:24:14 GMT
TomGee wrote:
Why [should I read Einstein's E=mc^2 paper], Worms?
You might learn something, TomGee. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: TomGee
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- References:
- A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: PD
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Paul Stowe
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: PD
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: TomGee
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Sam Wormley
- A New Foundation for Physics
- Prev by Date: Re: What is electricity?
- Next by Date: Re: What is electricity?
- Previous by thread: Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- Next by thread: Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- Index(es):
