Re: basic mechanics question
- From: brian a m stuckless <bastuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:22:01 GMT
PD wrote:
>
> Autymn D. C. wrote:
> > Demonstrating whatever is tantamount to measuring. And the empiricism
> > doesn't pay attention to most reactions to see whether the conservation
> > does hold. You'll find that momentum is quite untrackable in inelastic
> > collisions or outer space.
>
> Really? Momentum is quite untrackable in inelastic collisions? You do
> know that this is the basis for that handy little chart that police
> officers use to determine how fast you were going when you rear-ended
> that Pontiac?
>
> Really? Momentum is quite untrackable in outer space? You do know that
> conservation of angular momentum is the basis for Kepler's laws?
>
> PD
SEEMs, momentum is ALWAYs "passe" (i.e. in RETROspect);
Or as with POLiCE radar ..ONLY *2nd-hand* RETROspect.!!
```Brian
.
- References:
- basic mechanics question
- From: vsgdp
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: PD
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: PD
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: Autymn D. C.
- basic mechanics question
- Prev by Date: Re: Anyone is both God and an insect, depending on what he compares himself to.
- Next by Date: Re: basic mechanics question
- Previous by thread: Re: basic mechanics question
- Next by thread: Re: basic mechanics question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|