Re: basic mechanics question
- From: Richard Herring <junk@[127.0.0.1]>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:36:13 +0100
In message <1126876035.685668.189910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> writes
Autymn D. C. wrote:Demonstrating whatever is tantamount to measuring. And the empiricism doesn't pay attention to most reactions to see whether the conservation does hold. You'll find that momentum is quite untrackable in inelastic collisions or outer space.
Really? Momentum is quite untrackable in inelastic collisions? You do know that this is the basis for that handy little chart that police officers use to determine how fast you were going when you rear-ended that Pontiac?
Really? Momentum is quite untrackable in outer space? You do know that conservation of angular momentum is the basis for Kepler's laws?
Poor dear's never heard of Noether's theorems.
-- Richard Herring .
- References:
- basic mechanics question
- From: vsgdp
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: PD
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: PD
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: basic mechanics question
- From: Autymn D. C.
- basic mechanics question
- Prev by Date: Re: basic mechanics question
- Next by Date: Re: Do people in this group REALLY know something about physics?
- Previous by thread: Re: basic mechanics question
- Next by thread: Re: basic mechanics question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|