Re: Anyone is both God and an insect, depending on what he compares himself to.
- From: "Wizard of Odd" <spiritualhealing2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Sep 2005 05:56:20 -0700
Autymn D. C. wrote to me:
> Blah Blah Grammar Blah Blah
> I said that nature != God. You went non sequitur, and passed on that
> lige. Stop flooding and making rubbish up.
Flooding??
These are my own views, I shall not be talked down to by an imbecile
like yourself who as no manners. Didn't you understand anything I said?
'Great spirits have always encountered opposition from mediocre minds.
The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to
bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express
his opinions courageously and honestly.' - Your totally mediocre to the
nth degree.
You must have a chip the size of this planet on your shoulder, what
makes you the God of this newsgroup!
Autymn attacks Jeff_Relf
> I'm not a he, blind retard! And stop conflating dimensions; no they're
> not. Stay off Usenet, worthless toad.
You are the worthless toad! How dare you undermine a person's freedom
of speech and belief.
I assume one of your chief interests (obviously your life is dreadfully
sad) is fishing in Usenet:
1. Fish for newbie's or people I dislike in a newsgroup.
2. Catch this fish then berate the person's viewpoints, attacking
grammatical errors if they exist as a low form of attack. (I know I
have bad grammar get over it, but I do have a brain unlike you where
the spinal cord would suffice - ask Einstein).
3. Hope the person as a weak mind.
4. If person doesn't agree then become extremely rude. I'm the God of
this newsgroup, you are an idiot (Blah Blah) - you will now bow and
believe everything I say.
5. Print "You are wrong"
6. Goto 5 To Infinity
You've picked on the wrong fish!
I'd say you were a piranha.
My belief that nature is God is fully supported by the conjecture that
all things are a part of God. So maybe I should have said God =
Everything, which is much more accurate.
But for a real blunder take for instance one of the major gaffes in
physics:
Last night on BBC2's Horizon about The Hawking Paradox - Stephen
Hawking's 30 year belief in his equation which indicated a loss of
information in a black hole. He was wrong about this, retracting this
view for a more ludicrous version.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/hawking_prog_summary.shtml
.
- References:
- Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?
- From: Wizard of Odd
- Re: Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?
- From: Wizard of Odd
- Re: Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Re: Anyone is both God and an insect, depending on what he compares himself to.
- From: Autymn D. C.
- Dark Matter: Is it just a case of vibrational rates?
- Prev by Date: Re: Basic question about radiation
- Next by Date: Re: basic mechanics question
- Previous by thread: Re: Anyone is both God and an insect, depending on what he compares himself to.
- Next by thread: Re: Anyone is both God and an insect, depending on what he compares himself to.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|