Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: Paul Stowe <TheAetherist@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:12:18 GMT
On 17 Sep 2005 09:35:05 -0700, "David Thomson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
>
>> Bwah, ha, ha, ha, ... Oh, let me catch my breath.
>
>> "Ah, arrogance AND stupidity all in the same package, how
>> efficient of you."
>
> Is that the full extent of your intelligence? Or are you
> holding your punches for later?
;)
> Did you find something wrong with the theory?
You must not have been paying attention earlier, eh.
Not surprising... Let's start with something simple, shall
we. Derive Plancks's constant from the fundamental of
'your theory' and show its relationship to elemental charge.
All you've done in you paper is play around with well known
terms like the Compton wavelength, etc.
Paul Stowe
.
- References:
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: PD
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- From: David Thomson
- Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- Prev by Date: Re: Has climate change made hurricanes fiercer, or are such claims hotair?
- Next by Date: Re: Is the universe going to fall apart ?
- Previous by thread: Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- Next by thread: Re: A New Foundation for Physics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|