Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
- From: "mountain man" <hobbit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:08:11 GMT
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hEBZe.366942$_o.330866@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael
> Fowler
> http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/spec_rel.html
>
> You Really Can't Tell You're Moving!
> See:
> http://galileoandeinstein.physics.virginia.edu/lectures/spec_rel.html
You'll also note that the lecture/article concludes with
a paragagraph about the history of the issue:
"Historically, however, it leaves much to be desired!
Attempts to interpret the Michelson-Morley result in
terms of an ether-based theory by FitzGerald, Lorentz
and others led to results with some striking similarities
to Einstein's."
--
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
OZ
www.mountainman.com.au
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
- Next by Date: Re: Luminiferous aether
- Previous by thread: Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
- Next by thread: Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading