Re: Why not intrinsic redshift?
- From: donstockbauer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Sep 2005 03:25:04 -0700
Would need to be a pretty systematic intrinsic redshift to see it
uniformly in all directions and for it to progress acording to Hubble's
law. Sure, there's some intrinsic redshift. But we see a uniform RS
out to the causal horizon, at which point the redshift = c. And there
is more Universe beyond that, we just cant see it , just like on Earth,
we cannot see beyond our horizon but there is surely more earth past
that. Gee, just like the song:
"And I think to myself, what a wonderful world."
Except when people on this usergroup start in with the discourtesy and
foul language. That bites Limousin bull penis.
.
- References:
- Why not intrinsic redshift?
- From: Happy Hippy
- Why not intrinsic redshift?
- Prev by Date: Re: When magnets do work by lifting things, do they get colder?
- Next by Date: Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
- Previous by thread: Why not intrinsic redshift?
- Next by thread: Re: Why not intrinsic redshift?
- Index(es):