Re: continuity
- From: "Mark Martin" <qed100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Sep 2005 09:31:27 -0700
c.j.robertson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> all physics teachers and lecturers should make clear to their students
> that nothing physical, such as time, the spectrum of electromagnetic
> waves and so forth, can be shown to be continuous. it is not possible
> to show that something is continuous by measurement because of the
> dependence on infinity in the definition of continuity. to many people
> seem to take for granted that time is continuous, same thing with the
> spectrum of light. they should instead say that everything is probably
> quantized or something like that.
There's a difference between telling students that measurements have
some finite accuracy and concluding therefrom that all things are,
objectively, discrete.
Is space-time discrete? Maybe. Maybe not. Do you have a fact-based
theory which requires discrete space-time, and is in a testable form?
-Mark Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: continuity
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: continuity
- References:
- continuity
- From: c . j . robertson
- continuity
- Prev by Date: Re: Space is clearly something not nothing
- Next by Date: Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
- Previous by thread: continuity
- Next by thread: Re: continuity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|