sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Careers in Physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Riccati Equation Generalized For Universe Influencing Intersections
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does the Levitron Globe Spin?
  • From: qquito
• Re: tj Frazir's legend of the LPE
  • From: hanson
• Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Frazir is a moron
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir is a moron
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir is a moron
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: guitar harmonics
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Universe: How It Developed Probability and Probable Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• starshop video
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Steehs
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Steehs
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Nick
• Re: Japan developing remote control for humans
  • From: hanson
• tj Frazir's legend of the LPE
  • From: hanson
• Re: Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: Lefty
• Ask-a-Friend Marketplaces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: tj Frazir
• Androcles don't burn the "vee"tches!...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Tidal forces
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Neil W
• Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tidal forces
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Tidal forces
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Perplexing Toy Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Orion
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• cog
  • From: fresh~horses
• Re: Perplexing Toy Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: john_ramsden
• Runaway Universe Equation and Theorem
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted martin
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases 3: Overweight
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Universe vs Human: Could Viruses Be Probability Diseases?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent-Dependent Phases 37: Bohr-Sommerfeld Lagrangian Submanifolds
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A hole on the roof... [optics]
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Jim Black
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Oct 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: missile launch
  • From: bob
• Re: missile launch
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: A hole on the roof... [optics]
  • From: Externet
• Re: missile launch
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Japan developing remote control for humans
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Titanium Batteries
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: math problem for Frazir 260 281 2497 in book stupid
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: Harry
• Re: Japan developing remote control for humans
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: Nick
• Re: math problem no problem but pissing you of is GOOD
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Orbits, energy, and escaping oh my! an interesting question about these things
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: Nick
• Re: neutron star crashing into a black hole or another neutron star
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: formula for energy of cold-water evaporation?
  • From: shoemakerted
• Re: Pauli(2)
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: uncle Al is back !!!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: math problem for Frazir
  • From: jimp
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: OsherD
• math problem for Frazir
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electron vs. positron
  • From: Old Man
• Re: formula for energy of cold-water evaporation?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: formula for energy of cold-water evaporation?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: formula for energy of cold-water evaporation?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: measuring the speed of light with a microwave?
  • From: zod
• Re: Qunatum theory of material mechanics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electron vs. positron
  • From: gmarkowsky
• electron vs. positron
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Cougar
• Re: Filled atomic shells?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Alka
• Re: Have pity... it's a tech_bust.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cognito Ego Sum!
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Telepathy: Do the Most Creative Physicists/Mathematicians Have It?
  • From: maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What do Einstein, Darwin and emails have in common?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Ghost slipped and busted his ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A solution to the Peak Oil Crisis?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Engineers Report Breakthrough in Laser Beam Technology
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Ultrasound Beyond the Speed of Light
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Cognito Ego Sum!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: Nosterill
• Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists that are 12 yo
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: Lefty
• morons nothing but morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• morons nothing but morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• morons nothing but morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• morons nothing but morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• morons nothing but morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: macromitch
• Re: A model of Dark Energy
  • From: macromitch
• Independent/Dependent Phases 33.1: Conjecture on Falicov-Kimball Lattice
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: macromitch
• Re: IMAX "moonwalk" filmed on-location
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A model of Dark Energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists that are 12 yo
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists that are 12 yo
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Ghost ran away as allways
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Ghost ran away as allways
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Ghost ran away as allways
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s martin cant do any math
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s martin cant do any math
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 1/10 the power new processor revealed
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: jimp
• A model of the aether
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
  • From: donstockbauer
• Foam result surprises scientists
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pioneer 10 looks like red shift, not blue
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: T.J.'s pissed-on engine
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: World's smallest car
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s pissed-on engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GRAVITY AND THE PHOTON
  • From: Nick
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• T.J.'s pissed-on engine
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: Androcles
• Independent/Dependent Phases 33: Falicov-Kimball Phase Transition Model
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Passing Zero
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: experimental advise needed
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: IMAX "moonwalk" filmed on-location
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: experimental advise needed
  • From: maghas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• experimental advise needed
  • From: jack
• Re: 5 00 MWatt free energy
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: What does a quark, a photon or a gluon look like?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: PD
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: something about the theory of special relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Passing Zero
  • From: PD
• Re: light going faster than, uh, light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Passing Zero
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Could it be that Knode, Pan and Linux are simply that retarded ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• BLOW UP THE MOON!!!
  • From: peterjc
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: light going faster than, uh, light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: PD
• Passing Zero
  • From: eddie jw
• Re: Quantum physics
  • From: eddie jw
• Running fuel cells in reverse.
  • From: PlanckQ
• Re: The Cycle Song!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: hanson
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Alka
• Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physics Book
  • From: PD
• Re: DedaNoe Googles Hard!
  • From: Mark Martin
• 1/10 the power new processor revealed
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• DedaNoe Googles Hard!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Cycle Song!
  • From: donstockbauer
• The Cycle Song!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: transient conduction in a concrete wall - HELP NEEDED;)
  • From: AJW
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 31: Temperature, Heat Squares or Cubes
  • From: OsherD
• transient conduction in a concrete wall - HELP NEEDED;)
  • From: mitjakosir
• Re: Sorry T.J... The con is up.
  • From: Blood Money
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 31: Temperature, Heat Squares or Cubes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 31: Temperature, Heat Squares or Cubes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Independent/Dependent Phases 31: Temperature, Heat Squares or Cubes
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 31: Temperature or Heat Squares, Cubes, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perplexing Toy Problem
  • From: hhc314
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Perplexing Toy Problem
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: 5 00 MWatt free energy
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• New forum
  • From: WaiteDavid137
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: What does a quark, a photon or a gluon look like?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: something about the theory of special relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• Re: What does a quark, a photon or a gluon look like?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• solar cell from two types of inorganic nanocrystal
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What does a quark, a photon or a gluon look like?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: something about the theory of special relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: color of metals
  • From: tadchem
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
  • From: Javier Bezos
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Androcles
• Re: light going faster than, uh, light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: something about the theory of special relativity
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Bomb Song!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 24, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• The Bomb Song!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: color of metals
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: MorituriMax
• color of metals
  • From: cliff . r . wong
• T.J's liquid piston engine
  • From: hanson
• something about the theory of special relativity
  • From: vector
• Re: light going faster than, uh, light
  • From: Nick
• 5 00 MWatt free energy
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: hydrogen ions in bubble chamber
  • From: mmeron
• Re: dedanoe wan't say a word about levers anymore
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: dedanoe wan't say a word about levers anymore
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"</H2></B>
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: dedanoe wan't say a word about levers anymore
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• hydrogen ions in bubble chamber
  • From: bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx
• dedanoe wan't say a word about levers anymore
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: platopes
• Re: Post the simple facts dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics Book
  • From: François Guillet
• Re: Article: Many happy returns, Earth
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals
  • From: paul v birke
• Re: Evidence for plate tectonics on Mars supports the idea on an ea...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Post the math stupid cunt
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: AJW
• quasars from bright spirals
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: bobkolker
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 30: 1 Codes As Infinity
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 30: 1 Codes As Infinity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals
  • From: hanson
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wind turbine makes a home energy self sufficient
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re:Matin fartin wake cant do the math and play child games
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals
  • From: paul v birke
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: AJW
• Re: Nobel Prizes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Volumes and Areas and the Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics Book
  • From: LinuxFreak
• Re: Math Books
  • From: LinuxFreak
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Glastonbury Tor Photo Shows Spiritual Phenomena
  • From: John Baker
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is it about matter that slows light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nobels Prizes not that noble
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 29: Clifford Algebras, Spacetime Calculus
  • From: OsherD
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Physics Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Getting into the industry.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Physics Book
  • From: LinuxFreak
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Slim and Sturdy Solar Cells: Nanocrystals offer path to electricity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: net force in simple lever - shame on newton
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: hanson
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Physics and Philosophy
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• net force in simple lever - shame on newton
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Physics and Philosophy
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: JMosey
• Re: River of shit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: River of shit
  • From: hanson
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Oct 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: JMosey
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: River of shit
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Hosp
• Re: River of shit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Physicists have observed the Jahn-Teller effect in a molecule
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Emission VS absorption band for CO2 near 4.3 microns
  • From: Androcles
• Emission VS absorption band for CO2 near 4.3 microns
  • From: PlanckQ
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Looking for Internet Picture of the Green Glint of the Sun
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: Does exponential acceleration affect measurement of light speed?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands)
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: River of uncle Al's shit
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 150 ready-to-run calculations
  • From: Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: platopes
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: gloopencrotum
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark Matter -- One Mystery Solved (Update)
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: River of uncle Al's shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Electrodynamics' problem--Earnshaw's theorem.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: River of shit
  • From: hanson
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: T Wake
• For Any Mathematicians: 100 Yr Flood FEMA Statistics ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dark Matter -- One Mystery Solved (Update)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: River of shit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Article: 'Axis of evil' warps cosmic background
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Brown Dwarfs ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Electrodynamics' problem--Earnshaw's theorem.
  • From: Harry
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: platopes
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: River of uncle Al's shit
  • From: hanson
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: 150 ready-to-run calculations
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• 150 ready-to-run calculations
  • From: calcmaster
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Is there Bell's Theorem?
  • From: nightlight
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: gloopencrotum
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: andrewspencers
• Re: Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How David Touretzky censored my website
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How David Touretzky censored my website
  • From: Barbara Schwarz
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: solartron manuals, where oh where?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Orion
• Does exponential acceleration affect measurement of light speed?
  • From: andrewspencers
• Re: T.J., Wake is fucking coward pansi get the fuck out
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How do we determine the accuracy of our clocks?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Looking for Internet Pictures of What Living Things Actually See (That Use Non-Visual Bands)
  • From: clusardi2k
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Orion
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: River of uncle Al's shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Purpose of Inflation
  • From: donstockbauer
• My own experience on "sci.physics.research"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: PD
• Re: River of uncle Al's shit
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: RP
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: RP
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Wonky
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: Wonky
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Birefringence
  • From: RP
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: MorituriMax
• Birefringence
  • From: Wonky
• Re: Archimedes Plutonium has been awarded an Honorary Doctor of Laws
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Independent/Dependent Phases 28: Gravitation and Coulomb Via 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: quantum measurement
  • From: karan
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: PD
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Is physics a dead science?
  • From: ubuu7
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Are quasars really at the large distances indicated by their redshifts?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Shiver My Timber
• Re: Maths Symbols in newsgroup
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Mark Martin
• quantum measurement
  • From: karan
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Lynette
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 27: Dyt vs Dtt Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Independent/Dependent Phases 27: Dyt vs Dtt Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re:What are UFOs
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity
  • From: tadchem
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Richard Herring
• How to determine whether a system is open or closed
  • From: PD
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Shiver My Timber
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Dimensional Analysis and Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?
  • From: PD
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: PD
• Re: how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: John C . Polasek
• how do they know they've got only one proton, electron, etc?
  • From: Neil W
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: Justice International
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Maths Symbols in newsgroup
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: Justice International
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: PD
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: Justice International
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: platopes
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'Light'
  • From: PD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: platopes
• 'Light'
  • From: Justice International
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: PD
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: John Park
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: Conservation of energy
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Maps From the Riccati Equation to the Cartan Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: Uno Lapideus
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Variable Speed of Light in a Gravitational Field
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: RP
• Re: Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Posted another Preview Paper
  • From: John Park
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Gravitational potential inside a sphere
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics' and Math's 0-1-2-3 in Psychology, Cryptography, and Social Sciences
  • From: OsherD
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Are quasars really at the large distances indicated by their redshifts?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Russell Turpin's "Characterization of Quack Theories"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics' and Math's 0-1-2-3 in Psychology, Cryptography, and Social Sciences
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Shiver My Timber
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• OK- who has dibs on the name 'Uncle Al' now that it is vacant?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• nano-scale electromechanical switch
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Special Relativity - Linear Transformation (again)
  • From: Shiver My Timber
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: tdp1001
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 750 October 19, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Distance vs Quadrance?
  • From: Norman Wildberger
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Archimedes deathray....
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Archimedses deathray....
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Archimedses deathray....
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: platopes
• Theories of light 2: ether theories
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: Nick
• The existance of time as anything other than a mere "concept"
  • From: John2005
• Re: Distance vs Quadrance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Petrol Prices
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Rotational motion of planets
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: platopes
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: platopes
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Petrol Prices
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: PD
• Re: message in the sky
  • From: tadchem
• Re: message in the sky
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: PD
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: platopes
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: message in the sky
  • From: PD
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: PD
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Orex
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Harry
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: PD
• Re: Rotational motion of planets
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Petrol Prices
  • From: jimp
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• Rotational motion of planets
  • From: remove the o's
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: message in the sky
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Greysky
• Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind.
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: MorituriMax
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J.'s engine design.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: platopes
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: gubernacullum
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: cnctut
• Re: God and storms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: Androcles
• Interpreting Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Robert
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: cnctut
• Re: The Speed of Light is Constant by Defintion
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Physics for Geese
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: news
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• gaining the waist
  • From: dedanoe
• message in the sky
  • From: John Baez
• Re: My Red Ball
  • From: Stevie B
• Re: My Red Ball
  • From: Stevie B
• state variables
  • From: biplabbose@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My Red Ball
  • From: Josie Margolis
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Physics for Geese
  • From: cnctut
• Re: My Red Ball
  • From: Stevie B
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: news
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: news
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heavy ions damage DNA
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Something to relever me by
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space Waste, Space Junk
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: curses curses and more curses
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FUCK YOU TOO
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light Photons/Waves
  • From: Stevie B
• Re: A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: My Red Ball
  • From: Stevie B
• A universal constant for relativity?
  • From: news
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 26: A Beautiful Mind Via Saddle Points
  • From: OsherD
• Re: continuity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Independent/Dependent Phases 26: A Beautiful Mind Via Saddle Points
  • From: OsherD
• Re: heat engine
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: curses curses and more curses
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is President Bush an Alien?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: projectile: need to know angle
  • From: CWatters
• Re: T.J.'s poorer than me where it counts the most, the mind.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How consciousness really works
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: GEORGE BUSH IS A ROTHSCHILD Re: Is President Bush an Alien?
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Poor Bilge.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The economy really sucks right now.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23.2: "Varying universal constants"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: why fire moves upward
  • From: GQrivy
• Independent/Dependent Phases 23.2: "Varying universal constants"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• why fire moves upward
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Independent/Dependent Phases 23.1: Thermal and Electromagnetic Dimensions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heavy ions damage DNA
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Something to relever me by
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space Waste, Space Junk
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Androcles
• FUCK YOU TOO
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s LPE uses liquid oxygen ? How safe is that ? How costly ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• yourgrau book on Einstein and Gödel --- which Gödel paper is it
  • From: HK
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Erom
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space Waste, Space Junk
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Something to relever me by
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heavy ions damage DNA
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space Waste, Space Junk
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: strings
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 23: Generalized Dimensional Analysis With 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Torval Haakon
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• New Physics Theory
  • From: Don
• Space Waste, Space Junk
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: TRAGEDY ON ONE OF THE WORLD'S MAIN FAULT LINES
  • From: donstockbauer
• Something to relever me by
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 22: 196 Papers on Long Memory/Hysteresis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 22: 196 Papers on Long Memory/Hysteresis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus
  • From: hanson
• Study Shows Silver Nanoparticles Attach to HIV-1 virus
  • From: Mike
• Re: http://www.bookoogle.com/book/
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: http://www.bookoogle.com/book/
  • From: hhc314
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: What are UFOs uniformed fucking orleans
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: Will Janoschka
• http://www.bookoogle.com/book/
  • From: anilkbatra
• Re: The economy really sucks right now.
  • From: High Plains Thumper
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Orion
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Most people on Usenet are mainly talking to themselves.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries
  • From: OsherD
• HIV would just be the result, not the cause.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries
  • From: OsherD
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: Androcles
• Independent/Dependent Phases 21: 0 and 1 as Phase Boundaries
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid
  • From: EugeniuszW
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Oct 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Oscilating mass of ideal liquid
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary
  • From: OsherD
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: hhc314
• Oscilating mass of ideal liquid
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: hhc314
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: T Wake
• Pedagogical Machine
  • From: jordan
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary
  • From: hhc314
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: PD
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Pi
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: PD
• Re: Pi
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Movement in an independent frame of reference, which is made out of light
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: a good online textbook
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: T Wake
• Self Assembled Monolayers Question
  • From: jacob . trevino
• Re: uncertain abt uncertainity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• Re: Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!
  • From: StilllovingMarty
• Re: agreement and knowledge
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: briggs
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Richard Herring
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Erom
• Electric fields have been used to produce vortex rings in pure water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein, Maric, Political Correctness, Nova, PBS
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: uncertain abt uncertainity
  • From: oldton
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: uncertain abt uncertainity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• uncertain abt uncertainity
  • From: oldton
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: oldton
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: oldton
• Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Richard Herring
• Classical (real) physics predicts gravity-wave
  • From: Jos
• Re: Eotvos - latest news.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• Re: agreement and knowledge
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: LZ
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: briggs
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: i wanna be a crackpot
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Two Stars with same mass
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Two Stars with same mass
  • From: George
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 20: The Reasons For 1/2 As Phase Boundary
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GEORGE BUSH IS A ROTHSCHILD Re: Is President Bush an Alien?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Eotvos - latest news.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: i wanna be a crackpot
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: anilmanual
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: Androcles
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: pete
• Re: I will not be using condoms.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: capacitor discharge
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: i wanna be a crackpot
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Re: just between you and me
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Re: agreement and knowledge
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Independent/Dependent Phases 19.4: Which Quadric Intersections Yield (Phase) 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• a good online textbook
  • From: strings
• just between you and me
  • From: strings
• i wanna be a crackpot
  • From: strings
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: PlanckQ
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Paul Stowe
• why don't certain things liquify?
  • From: metaperl
• Re: The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I will not be using condoms.
  • From: Rick
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!
  • From: jimp
• Re: The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: Androcles
• The phuckwit "Uncle Al" doesn't know what escape velocity is!
  • From: Androcles
• Prevention and Control of Hurricanes - "yes" it's possible today!
  • From: Hurricane Guy
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Blackbody radiation VS Spectral line emissions
  • From: PlanckQ
• Re: Does time exist ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Bulletin: The Original Nuclear Nightmare
  • From: Wayne Brown
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?
  • From: BEM
• Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Light wave
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Light wave
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New Breathtaking Confirmation of Special Relativity
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Light wave
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Do all object reach terminal velocity?
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Do all object reach terminal velocity?
  • From: Michael Sherlock
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: PD
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE Number 749 October 13, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe and Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: molecules move deterministically
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: PD
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bulletin: The Original Nuclear Nightmare
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: T.J. doesn't talk the language of finance... or English.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Eotvos - latest news.
  • From: platopes
• Re: Light wave
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Paper on relativity crankdom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Harry
• Re: On permittivity and permeability
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Independent/Dependent Phases 20: Intersection of Sphere and Cone
  • From: OsherD
• Re: molecules move deterministically
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Bob Cain
• Who's Afraid of a Solar Flare?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric
  • From: OsherD
• Re: image processing technique - galaxies - abstract art
  • From: donstockbauer
• Independent/Dependent Phases 19.3: Not Complete Concordance in Quadric
  • From: OsherD
• Aluminum Bicycle Frames
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• image processing technique - galaxies - abstract art
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Rich people can be illiterate/crazy too.
  • From: Dave Saurus
• Re: What are UFOs uniformed fucking orleans
  • From: tj Frazir
• Paper on relativity crankdom
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: EMR Induces Electrical Current in Amalgam Fillings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: An urgent message for Archimedes Plutonium
  • From: donstockbauer
• An urgent message for Archimedes Plutonium
  • From: Ian St. John
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: OG
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 19.2 Square Root of a Quadric
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 19.2 Square Root of a Quadric
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases: PI as the Square Root of the General Quadratic/Affine or Conic
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases: PI as the Square Root of the General Quadratic/Affine or Conic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Accessing lost computer data via the Akashic Records
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light wave
  • From: donstockbauer
• Accessing lost computer data via the Akashic Records
  • From: dunric
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Independent/Dependent Phases 18.2: The Universe Discovers 0, 1, 2, 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: About a ge-dinghy-n experiment (hint: pun)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How David Touretzky censored my website
  • From: tadchem
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Light wave
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Light wave
  • From: TomGee
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: PD
• Re: Light wave
  • From: PD
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light wave
  • From: Doug Huffman
• Re: How height affects velocity
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Read before responding (was: How David Touretzky censored my website)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: PHYSICS HOMEWORK PROBLEM
  • From: PD
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: strings
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: strings
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: strings
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: TomGee
• Science, Technology, the DARPA Challenge
  • From: hanson
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: charge-pair why not?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons
  • From: RP
• Re: Light wave
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: OT What happened to sci.physics.research?
  • From: john_ramsden
• Light wave
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Light wave
  • From: gmarkowsky
• OT What happened to sci.physics.research?
  • From: himog
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Physicists in France have demonstrated the Hall effect with phonons
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Article: Analysis of the gravitational signals from a newly discovered Kardashev II civilization in the Sombrero Galaxy
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Six lane underground rail lines
  • From: jimp
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: John Velman
• Re: How big is the concrete block?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Robot cars finish DARPA Challenge
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?
  • From: Robert Israel
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: jimp
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Traveler
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: IC packaging
  • From: Androcles
• Re: IC packaging
  • From: rge11x
• Re: An alternate explanation of E=mc^2
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: sobering@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 15: Interdisciplinary
  • From: OsherD
• De Gennes Scandal - now with documents!!
  • From: jimal1971
• Independent/Dependent Phases 15: Interdisciplinary
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14.1: 1, 2, sqrt 3 in Generalized Isoperimetric
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 14.1: 1, 2, sqrt 3 in Generalized Isoperimetric
  • From: OsherD
• Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: shanefield
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated - my refs
  • From: Harry
• Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated
  • From: TomGee
• Re: A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: donstockbauer
• A Gedinghyn experiment
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Quantum Entanglement Illustrated
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Browse your gothic lovers' photos and chat with them online!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Richard Herring
• Quantum Entanglement Illustrated
  • From: Dave Jarvis
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: Androcles
• DVDs going up the spout - Another reason to quit smoking
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions
  • From: epsilon
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Independent/Dependent Phases 14: Generalized Isoperimetric Inequalities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?
  • From: N . Jankowski . groups
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: Orion
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Warped Passages & Macroscopic Hidden Dimensions
  • From: epsilon
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Heat equation, confusing boundary conditions?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Increasingly, judges decide what science--if any--a jury hears
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: I'm being evicted for overcrowding.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: janey3white
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What if ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Incredible
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Article: Solids that can pass through solids
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: shanefield
• Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity
  • From: Pille
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Density
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: GOD=G_uv HOW TO MAKE AN INVISIBLE GOD MOVIE
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Incredible
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: markwh04
• Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: curved space?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Infinity Problems in QM
  • From: markwh04
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Thrust
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Hanging Phuckwit Duck
  • From: PD
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: comtech
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: PD
• Re: Thrust prehot bells from hell.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thrust
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: light moving slower
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Emor
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Emor
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: shanefield
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Elementary particles have exact charge and mass (part 2)!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Consider the electron as a union of two halves!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Independent/Dependent Phases 13.2: Levy Concentration Function
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 13.1 References on Levy Concentration Measure
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: dividby0
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: comtech
• You might want to change the thread title to: "Pentcho Valev, tries to justify his lack of physics education"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Independent/Dependent Phases 13.1 References on Levy Concentration Measure
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Independent/Dependent Phases 13: Levy Concentration Measure
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: OsherD
• Re: T.J., who understands you better then Jeff_Relf does ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Infinity Problems in QM
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: heat pde proof
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: heat pde proof
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thrust mock 2 water rocket
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thrust
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Siphons
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Gravity Light, Light Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Gravity Light, Light Gravity
  • From: baramos
• Re: heat pde proof
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thrust
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thrust
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: shanefield
• Re: Getting students interested in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: JamesMBrust
• Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Bob Day
• heat pde proof
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Incredible
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: xyzer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: Mark-T
• Re: light moving slower
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Infinity Problems in QM
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Getting students interested in physics
  • From: shanefield
• Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth.
  • From: mike3
• Re: light moving slower
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: light moving slower
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sadly, Chris_V's _Plonks_ are amoung his greatest contributions...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Am I softy or what ? stupid wake and morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: charge-pair why not?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• charge-pair why not?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Doug Huffman
• Re: light moving slower
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Light independent orientation (Lio)
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: The neutron and the binary logical paradox!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Doug Huffman
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Androcles
• Electric Glider
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Dirac Strings & Weightless Warp Drive of ET Spacecraft
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: curved space?
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Google goofs!
  • From: chubbchubbs
• Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Siphons
  • From: PD
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Siphons
  • From: PD
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Endless debate
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: Unlike T.J., I inherited no real estate.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Clarification of Section Numbering in Independent Sections 10 and 12
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Independent/Dependent Phases 12.3: PI Transformation of SR
  • From: OsherD
• Multiple Big Bangs & Singularity
  • From: amit
• Re: Sailing on air
  • From: Doug Huffman
• Sailing on air
  • From: narf968
• Re: PHOTONS and SR
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Temperatures needed to blow up the earth.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: Androcles
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Androcles
• Temperatures needed to blow up the earth.
  • From: mike3
• Re: A global role for physics
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: OsherD
• Superluminal Travel To Remote Galaxies
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 10.2: Special Relativity 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Impacting the moon for sport of science
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: One Step Away From Revealing If Einstein Was Right [again]
  • From: hanson
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: curved space?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• curved space?
  • From: drewmaps
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A global role for physics
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• One Step Away From Revealing If Einstein Was Right [again]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: When negative numbers are real
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: PHOTONS and SR
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Independent/Dependent Phases 10.1: Special Relativity 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes
  • From: jimp
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: hanson
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Mike Speed
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Endless debate
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Prevention and Control of Hurricanes
  • From: Hurricane Guy
• Re: a question about juggler
  • From: Mike
• a question about juggler
  • From: comtech
• Re: PHOTONS and SR
  • From: blackboab
• PHOTONS and SR
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Am I softy or what ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Independent/Dependent Phases 12: Special Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A global role for physics
  • From: Mike
• Binary Dice
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Increasingly, judges decide what science--if any--a jury hears
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Incredible
  • From: EugeniuszW
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 7 October 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Physicists have devised a new way to focus water waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GOD=G_uv GOD AND GLOBAL HEAT DEATH
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: operator jay
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: OG
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: OG
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Homes after Katrina
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: OG
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Siphons
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 11: Univariate fX(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: PD
• NON-POTENTIAL OBJECTS
  • From: viktor_mrz
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Siphons
  • From: jpopelish
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: OG
• Re: Why c^2 in E=mc^2?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Siphons
  • From: OG
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Siphons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 10: Re-interpretation of f(x,y) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Independent/Dependent Phases 10: Re-interpretation of f(x,y) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Homes after Katrina
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: PD
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Mike Speed
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativity for Nongs
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 9: Mixed Partial Physics Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Latest Theories about the Universe
  • From: nekoogar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J. is a fabulous writer at times... at times.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Siphons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Definitions of mass and force; A critique
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Vacuum challenges and solutions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Siphons
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: Siphons
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: Why does it matter if T.J. is rich or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Siphons
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Order of the Solar Temple
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Siphons
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Using electricity to repel an object?
  • From: janey3white
• Re: Siphons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: The curent state of physics
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: Chris Carlen
• Re: Siphons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: Mark-T
• Siphons
  • From: Mark-T
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: CWatters
• The curent state of physics
  • From: Mike Speed
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Do people in this group REALLY know something about physics?
  • From: tdennis14
• Re: elementary particles have exact charge and mass
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: T.J.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Conservation of energy
  • From: tdennis14
• Re: Thoughts on the new Feynman's Tips on Physics?
  • From: tdennis14
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: elementary particles have exact charge and mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Nobel Prize 2005 "Agrees" With Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: mmarziale2
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Human Individual Metamorphosis
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: mmarziale2
• Re: Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: Androcles
• Thermal insulation for vacuum use
  • From: mmarziale2
• Re: Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Androcles
• Is this experiment reproducible or valid?
  • From: Chris Carlen
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Gnah
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: muser
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz.
  • From: Doug Huffman
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: jimp
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Incredible
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5)
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: BBC Series "Space"
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Atanu
• elementary particles have exact charge and mass
  • From: dedanoe
• BBC Series "Space"
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• 1D wave PDE help
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 8: Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW)
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 8: Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: An alternate explanation of E=mc^2
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: PD
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: A global role for physics
  • From: jimp
• Re: Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: jimp
• Reviews
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A global role for physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Antiprotonic helium (Oct 5)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Probing the antiworld (Oct 5)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Did warm waters fuel Hurricane Katrina?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Evolution=atheism
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: collision of two neutron stars, or ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• collision of two neutron stars, or ...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wind energy overtakes nuclear energy in India
  • From: jimp
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible
  • From: OsherD
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: muser
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: possible silly questions
  • From: Mark Martin
• possible silly questions
  • From: muser
• Kinetic energy and power
  • From: jclause
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: PD
• Re: An even stranger idea..
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: PD
• Re: An even stranger idea..
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An even stranger idea..
  • From: tadchem
• neutron star crashing into a black hole or another neutron star
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Entanglement through environment
  • From: IWonder
• Re: Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos
  • From: hanson
• Re: Incredible
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Entanglement through environment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An even stranger idea..
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem
  • From: timwryan
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Incredible
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem
  • From: timwryan
• Entanglement through environment
  • From: IWonder
• Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos
  • From: kogs
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: blackboab
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: Terry
• Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos
  • From: hanson
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: John Neiberger
• Re: Physics Help. Spring Problem
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: John Neiberger
• Re: Dumb Question
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Schwarzchild radius of this Cosmos
  • From: kogs
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sknil
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: PD
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: Steve
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: Ian Parker
• An even stranger idea..
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Gap in Einstein's Early Argument for Existence of Photons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 6: Power pdf fX(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Independent/Dependent Phases 6: Power pdf fX(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Robot Equiped to Navigate Building's Interior
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Independent/Dependent Phases 5: Normal/Gaussian f(x) = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Results: full parity Eotvos experiment in quartz.
  • From: Will Janoschka
• Re: basic 2D vector question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Simple physics question (from BBC website)
  • From: Clutch-3
• Re: basic 2D vector question
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Incredible
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Once Again: Nobel prize recognizes optics researchers (Oct 4)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• basic 2D vector question
  • From: vsgdp
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 4: Some f(x) = 1/2 Comparisons
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 4: Some f(x) = 1/2 Comparisons
  • From: donstockbauer
• Independent/Dependent Phases 4: Some f(x) = 1/2 Comparisons
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: John Neiberger
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Dumb Question
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Incredible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: John Neiberger
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: radio
• Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds
  • From: mmeron
• Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Spacetime Torsion visualization
  • From: Androcles
• RE: Spacetime Torsion visualization
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Derive c from Planck's Constant and Coulomb's constant?
  • From: John Neiberger
• Light independent orientation (Lio)
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Independent/Dependent Phases 3: What is pdf f(t) = 1/2 in Accelerating Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Calculating wave functions?
  • From: PD
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Independent/Dependent Phases 2: Classical Logistic Equation
  • From: OsherD
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 748 October 4, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe and Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: zinc oxide
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: October caption
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Royal Astronomical Society Statement On The Proposed Abolition Of Leap Seconds
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Monist__
• Re: October caption
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Calculating wave functions?
  • From: Henri Tapani Heinonen
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• zinc oxide
  • From: j0komo
• zinc oxide
  • From: j0komo
• Re: I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits
  • From: mini haha
• October caption
  • From: Null
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• do not support the Trolls, don't support crossposting
  • From: mini haha
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: cirejcon
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Two Americans, a German Win 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: First year student seeking help with SSB in dusty plasma crystal
  • From: Andy Resnick
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sknil
• Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Jacob Sparre Andersen
• Re: Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Androcles
• Identifying the best physics content on the web
  • From: Atanu
• Dirac Delta
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: how to answer this question?
  • From: PD
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Independent/Dependent Phases
  • From: OsherD
• What was original in Einsteins SR theory ?
  • From: blackboab
• Independent/Dependent Phases
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence Derivative 16 Remarkable Approximation of Dyt Operator
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence Derivative 16 Remarkable Approximation of Dyt Operator
  • From: OsherD
• I'm reverse thinking and those are my limits
  • From: Paolo
• First year student seeking help with SSB in dusty plasma crystal
  • From: dkjk
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: PD
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: frames of reference..check my answer plz
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence 14: Mixed Riccati Second Partial Derivative
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: blackboab
• Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence 14: Mixed Riccati Second Partial Derivative
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Biological Evolution Rank Statistics Approximate Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Biological Evolution Rank Statistics Approximate Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What happens, if I touch them?
  • From: Henri Tapani Heinonen
• Re: 1/21 Puns
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What happens, if I touch them?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Trick13
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Trick13
• Re: Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Conservation of Energy Problem
  • From: Trick13
• Re: Real Number Space
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: help me plz
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: help me plz
  • From: inversinfinity
• Re: It cost me only 20 bucks and a few hours of my time... grandto...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What happens, if I touch them?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: Orion
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: Orion
• Starship Design 501
  • From: sburns808
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What happens, if I touch them?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: Orion
• Re: WARNING WARNING!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: AMERICA IS NOT GOING TO BE LAUGHING
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Androcles
• What happens, if I touch them?
  • From: Henri Tapani Heinonen
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: NASA Gravity Probe B Mission Update for 30 September 2005
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity for Nongs
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Theoretical Physics Made Easy for Public
  • From: nekoogar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Drugs wear down the immune system, so say nothing of the nervous system.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Increasing the amount of electric current carried by a high-temperature superconductor
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why global warming is good
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Eotvos - Status Update
  • From: WattMan
• Re: Could someone check this is right - SR length and time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: NeoCon Chickenhawk "Joseph Hertzlinger" Too Pussy To Fight His Pet War (GOP, The Party of Treason)
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How do we measure the speed of the light/radio arriving from di...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Space is clearly something not nothing
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Sphere Optimizes Simplicity of Expansion-Contraction Control
  • From: OsherD
• Acceleration of the Universe as Acceleration of Probable Influence 13: Bivariate Logistic Distribution
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativity for Nongs
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Space Factory
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Space Factory
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: It cost me only 20 bucks and a few hours of my time... grand to...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Tom "Scum" DeLay Incriminates Self on Fox News (GOP, The Party ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Tom "Scum" DeLay Incriminates Self on Fox News (GOP, The Party ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: About Gravity and Inertia
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: General Relativity Fails Once
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Relativity for Nongs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Real Number Space
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Tom "Scum" DeLay Incriminates Self on Fox News (GOP, The Party ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Perpetual Motion in Quantum Realm
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: spinorial objects?
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Einstein Or Darwin? Design Or Evolution?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How can Orbital Electron Rotate Permanently without Energy Supply?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: On basic formalism of special theory of relativity
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Eotvos - Status Update
  • From: WattMan
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Mike
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Llup
• Re: Eotvos - Status Update
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do all possibilities happen in the many worlds interpretation of QM?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Numbers of No Escape
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Do all possibilities happen in the many worlds interpretation of QM?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Wet FiNGER up iNSiDE Michelson Morely WiND speed TEST.!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The Space Factory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Logistic Distribution Comes From Rarity in arXiv and out of arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Numbers of No Escape
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Logistic Distribution Comes From Rarity in arXiv and out of arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Logistic Distribution Comes From Rarity in arXiv and out of arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Can Motion Relate to the Ether?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Space Factory
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Question about simultaneity and kinetic energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• The Space Factory
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Do all possibilities happen in the many worlds interpretation of QM?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Naturally, there can be no "aether"; Special Relativity Lecture by Michael Fowler
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: Pyriform
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Has the speed of light emitted by a fast moving particle been measured ?
  • From: Androcles
• Do all possibilities happen in the many worlds interpretation of QM?
  • From: John Graeme
• Re: Can someone idiotproof this for me
  • From: mmeron