Re: On permittivity and permeability
- From: "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:46:26 -0700
"Androcles" <Androcles@ MyPlace.org> wrote in message
news:qEr3f.16124$ey6.3465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Timo Nieminen" <timo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:Pine.LNX.4.50.0510131623280.28876-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| | In some recents posts, the claim was made that the permittivity and
| | permeability of free space are zero, and that the concepts of
| | permittivity and permeability are somehow intrinsically related to
| matter
| | or ether.
|
| HEY! Give credit. I, ANDROCLES, made that claim, not some vague
| recent posts.
Too bad that you are wrong about permittivity and permeability of free
space being zero. Quantum "vacuum" charge = +,- sqrt(hbar*c) rules,
baby!
| | So, what ARE permittivity and permeability all about?
| |
| | Consider that the Maxwell equations:
| |
| | curl H - dD/dt = J
| | curl E + dB/dt = 0
| | div D = rho
| | div B = 0
|
| Where is mu0, epsilon0 in those equations?
Too bad that you snipped out the part that shows where they are. Read
Jackson 3rd ed. and Griffiths' "Intro. to Electrodynamics". Please.
| | contain 4 fields: E, D, B, and H,
|
| But there are only 3 fields, gravitism, electrism and magnecity,
LOL!
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On permittivity and permeability
- From: Androcles
- Re: On permittivity and permeability
- Prev by Date: Re: Getting students interested in physics
- Next by Date: Re: Aluminum Bicycle Frames
- Previous by thread: Re: On permittivity and permeability
- Next by thread: Re: On permittivity and permeability
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|