Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
- From: "Javier Bezos" <see_below_no_spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Oct 2005 07:27:42 -0700
Juan R. wrote:
> Javier Bezos and C.L Masse attacked to me, /WHICH violates
> basic sci.physics.research guidelines/.
On the contrary, the moderator was very "polite" when
accepted two messages (at the beginning of the thread)
where you said I was making "bold questions" and my
comments were "childish". It's you who began with
attacks.
[Javier:]
> > "It would be interesting to know the reference to see the
> > context (1955 was an interesting year for several reasons).
> > As it has been shown here repeated times you very often
> > truncate the citations in order to change the true
> > intentions of theirs authors.
> >
> > Read the Preface of the Theory of Relativity where Pauli
> > categorically claims: "Eintein, the creator of the theory
> > of relativity". And please, read the _whole_ Preface since
> > it repeats this claim several times (the last paragraph,
> > for example)."
[Juan R.:]
> I already answer this. Read my posts before reply to me!!!
>
> I already explained that in 1921 Pauli claimed that Einstein was the
> father of relativity. BUT, and this is the part that you carefully
> omit, in posterior years Pauli *changed his mind* and claimed
You haven't read it. If you had bothered to read it you
would have __immediately__ noticed it wasn't written in 1921
because it begins with:
Thirty-five years ago this article on the theory of
relativity, written by me at the rather young age of
21 years [...]
The Preface was written in 1956! You are so busy trying to
discredit Einstein that you have no time to pursue the truth
or simply to read the sources you are citing. Very likely
the moderator knew the preface was written in 1956, that you
are inventing stories and that you are not interested at all
in the history of physics. Further, as of 1921 Pauli
already had read the Poincaré's papers or otherwise he would
have had telepathic powers, since his papers are cited very
often in the book. On the contrary, if instead of repeating
over and over again the same error(s) you would have given
the reference I was asking for, I'm pretty sure your message
would be approved by the moderators, but clearly you just
know neither the reference nor the context (very likely you
learnt the citation you gave from a paper which, in turn,
doesn't give the reference but only when a translation into
Russian was published by Nauk).
Unlike Harry, who has been polite with interesting posts
(which I don't share, but that's another matter), your
attitude from the very beggining was, simply, arrogant. And
if you would read the answer Harry gave to my post you could
have even read the Preface since he gave a link were the
preface was reproduced. Which makes your attitude even more
arrogant.
> THIS IS A PERSONAL ATTACK (flame), WITHOUT BASIS, TO Juan R.
> Moreover,
> the rest of the post regarding Pauli thougths is pure
> nonsense.
Saying you were lying is not an attack, as clearly you were
lying.
Now, since you haven't arguments you have decided to begin a
crusade against me and the moderators of s.p.r, as if we
were the responsible for your mistakes. As we Spaniards
say: "La ignorancia es muy atrevida" ("ignorance is very
bold") and therefore the only answer is...
PLONK
Javier
-----------------------------
¿Tu verdad? No, la verdad;
Vamos juntos a buscarla.
La tuya quédatela -- Antonio Machado
-----------------------------
http://www.texytipografia.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: Re: color of metals
- Next by Date: Re: T.J's liquid piston engine
- Previous by thread: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, October 24, 2005
- Next by thread: Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
