Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:00:05 GMT
In sci.physics, Orion
<danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 29 Oct 2005 11:12:23 -0700
<1130609543.501374.184140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>> In sci.physics, Orion
>> <danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote
>> on 29 Oct 2005 09:47:01 -0700
>> <1130604421.566354.49860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Erm, what force is that? Celestial motion merely requires motion;
>> it does not require force unless one wants to change the motion
>> (or move an object that was initially stopped).
>>
>> --
>> #191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> It's still legal to go .sigless.
>
> The kinetic energy must come from somewhere. Otherwise, why doesn't it
> just stop?
>
No friction out in deep space.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
- Next by Date: Re: Tidal forces
- Previous by thread: Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
- Next by thread: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
