Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
- From: "Robert Karl Stonjek" <stonjek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:40:33 GMT
"Orion" <danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1130609543.501374.184140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> > In sci.physics, Orion
> > <danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote
> > on 29 Oct 2005 09:47:01 -0700
> > <1130604421.566354.49860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Erm, what force is that? Celestial motion merely requires motion;
> > it does not require force unless one wants to change the motion
> > (or move an object that was initially stopped).
> >
> > --
> > #191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > It's still legal to go .sigless.
>
> The kinetic energy must come from somewhere. Otherwise, why doesn't it
> just stop?
>
RKS:
Where did you learn your physics - art class?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Perplexing Toy Problem
- Next by Date: P{(A U B)-->AB} = 1/2 Gives Astonishing Result
- Previous by thread: Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
- Next by thread: Re: Article: The Illusion of Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
