sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• Acquiring papers, Tolman
• old papers, David Macmanus
• The Generalised Born Postulate, Zinc Potterman
• Uncountably Many Outside Universes As Modified Multiverses, OsherD
• THE MECHANISM, Kevan
  • Re: THE MECHANISM, R. Pierce Butler
    • Re: THE MECHANISM, donstockbauer
• Origin of forces, Peter
  • Re: Origin of forces, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Origin of forces, ?
    • Re: Origin of forces, RP
      • Re: Origin of forces, donstockbauer
      • Re: Origin of forces, Y.Porat
  • Re: Origin of forces, Androcles
• Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
  • Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
  • Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, tj Frazir
    • Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
      • Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis, OsherD
• Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glo..., tj Frazir
• Re: Amount of light from linear floodlamp bulb, tj Frazir
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", X84
  • Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Sam Wormley
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light is a DUAL wave, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Give up Black Holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin
    • Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????, Mark Martin
• Re: FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: There has never been an earthquake on Thanksgiving, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Androcles
  • Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Doug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Mark Martin
  • Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, tadchem
  • Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
  • Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
    • Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, Dogma Discharge
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, Mark-T
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, Randy Poe
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, tadchem
      • Re: I LOVE YOU, Androcles
  • Re: I LOVE YOU, donstockbauer
• Re: The Caliber of Debunkers Is Waning, donstockbauer
• NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, G.L. Cross
  • Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, CWatters
  • Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, PD
  • Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem
    • Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time, tadchem
• Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble
  • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters
    • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Samsong
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Hubble
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tj Frazir
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, Old Man
  • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem
    • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, CWatters
      • Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation, tadchem
• Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Harry
  • Re: Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential), Old Man
• What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
  • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Tice with a J
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
  • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, donstockbauer
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Ian Parker
  • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
  • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Old Man
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mmeron
      • Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?, mechdan
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD
    • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy, OsherD
• Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On., donstockbauer
• Toroids, Greg G
  • Re: Toroids, John Popelish
  • Re: Toroids, Andy Resnick
    • Re: Toroids, Androcles
  • Re: Toroids, mmeron
  • Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Toroids, donstockbauer
      • Re: Toroids, Puppet_Sock
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J
  • Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley
    • Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Tice with a J
      • Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, ?
    • Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY, donstockbauer
• Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD
  • Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD
    • Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc., OsherD
• DOE Sensitive Subjects, righton20052
  • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug
  • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Randy Poe
    • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tadchem
      • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir
      • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Doug
      • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, hanson
      • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, tj Frazir
  • Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects, Androcles
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches", X84
  • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Sam Wormley
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 6: Baez and Neumaier, OsherD
• Relativistic computation, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: Relativistic computation, zinnic
  • Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon
    • Re: Relativistic computation, Dr Photon
  • Re: Relativistic computation, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Relativistic computation, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Relativistic computation, Helmut Wabnig
• help!i don't know its name., vector
  • Re: help!i don't know its name., Brit
    • Re: help!i don't know its name., tadchem
• Scientific error from observation, deloid
  • Re: Scientific error from observation, ?
  • Re: Scientific error from observation, Androcles
  • Re: Scientific error from observation, Sam Wormley
• About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Kwok Man Hui
  • Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley
  • Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter
    • Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Sam Wormley
      • Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record, Peter
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, OsherD
    • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999, Androcles
• Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
  • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
    • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, hhc314
  • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, donstockbauer
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Tice with a J
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Ken Muldrew
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, mmeron
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe
  • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Androcles
  • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Mark Fergerson
    • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, W. Watson
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler
    • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, donstockbauer
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Randy Poe
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike
    • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Mike
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, madscientist5500
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, R. Pierce Butler
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Androcles
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light, PD
• String theory?, ?
  • Re: String theory?, T Wake
  • Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: String theory?, ?
      • Re: String theory?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: String theory?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Singularities are ALL naked, ?
  • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Mark Martin
    • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, donstockbauer
      • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Androcles
      • Re: Singularities are ALL naked, Eric Gisse
• Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Robert
  • Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, R. Pierce Butler
  • Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?, Androcles
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5:1 Carlip, OsherD
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Tsom
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Sam Wormley
  • Spam - Re - "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", R. Pierce Butler
    • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Androcles
• photon size, Bernhard Kuemel
  • Re: photon size, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: photon size, Sam Wormley
    • Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: photon size, Sam Wormley
      • Re: photon size, Hero . van . Jindelt
      • Re: photon size, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: photon size, tj Frazir
  • Re: photon size, Old Man
    • Re: photon size, ?
      • Re: photon size, donstockbauer
      • Re: photon size, ?
    • Re: photon size: correction, Old Man
  • Re: photon size, Strongheart
• Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy
  • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles
    • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jimmy
      • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Androcles
  • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, John Christiansen
  • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Mark Fergerson
  • Re: Sacred geometry and physics, Al Zenner
• Re: THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION, donstockbauer
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy, Androcles
• A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin
  • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, mmeron
    • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, donstockbauer
      • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin
      • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles
      • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Segin
      • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles
  • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Androcles
  • Re: A little reminder abot anold troll, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: K&K Mechanics, nithyanand
• Desktop Railgun, Singapura99
  • Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314
  • Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Desktop Railgun, hhc314
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, tj Frazir
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, panteltje
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, donstockbauer
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Singapura99
      • Re: Desktop Railgun, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Desktop Railgun, CWatters
• Major problems of Modern Physics, djlockdown
  • Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, djlockdown
    • Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Androcles
  • Re: Major problems of Modern Physics, Old Man
• Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete
  • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, richard miller
      • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Mathlete
  • Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds, Schoenfeld
• Hi, guys., donstockbauer
  • Re: Hi, guys., hhc314
    • Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Hi, guys., mmeron
      • Re: Hi, guys., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Hi, guys., mmeron
      • Re: Hi, guys., hhc314
      • Re: Hi, guys., mmeron
      • Re: Hi, guys., hhc314
      • Re: Hi, guys., mmeron
      • Re: Hi, guys., hhc314
      • Re: Hi, guys., mmeron
• Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, donstockbauer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Article: On Atom Waves, Robert Karl Stonjek
  • Re: Article: On Atom Waves, Androcles
• Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown...., S. Enterprize Company
• test to see if new topics are being accepted, donstockbauer
• The Smart Model Theory Website, S. Enterprize Company
  • Re: The Smart Model Theory Website, Androcles
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Tsom
  • Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley
    • Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", hhc314
      • Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Sam Wormley
• Re: Photon-particles-observed, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Photon-particles-observed, Androcles
• The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), S. Enterprize Company
  • Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Sam Wormley
    • Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator)), Parrot Milk
• molecule to gather small groups of atoms and drop them, Sam Wormley
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
    • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, Androcles
      • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density, OsherD
• How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, muknot
  • Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, Androcles
  • Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?, jpolasek
• Re: Save your world, R. Pierce Butler
• Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, slehar
  • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
    • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Old Man
  • Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?, Peter
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Tsom
  • Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Sam Wormley
• The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Nanotube foams are strong and flexible, Sam Wormley
• Tiny swimmer makes a splash, Sam Wormley
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD
    • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations, OsherD
• fluid dynamics question, metro414
  • Re: fluid dynamics question, Rene Tschaggelar
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions, OsherD
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Androcles
  • Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?, Autymn D. C.
• Fusion, Physitrex
  • Re: Fusion, jimp
  • Re: Fusion, Mark Martin
  • Re: Fusion, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Fusion, Old Man
• Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito
  • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
    • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Greg Neill
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, donstockbauer
  • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin
    • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Mark Martin
    • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Michael Ejercito
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Autymn D. C.
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold, Ian Parker
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Tleb
  • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Mark Martin
  • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley
  • Light is being pushed!!!, Nick
    • Re: Light is being pushed!!!, chris
      • Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Nick
      • Re: Light is being pushed!!!, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Androcles
      • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Sam Wormley
      • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer
      • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", donstockbauer
      • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", Matthew Lybanon
    • Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?", don_stockbauer
• Light slower than CG?, ReGenesis0
  • Re: Light slower than CG?, Brit
  • Re: Light slower than CG?, Mark Fergerson
    • Re: Light slower than CG?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves, operator jay
• String Theory and "Beauty", mike3
  • Message not available
    • Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Androcles
      • Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Bob Cain
  • Re: String Theory and "Beauty", Juan R.
• Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Sam Wormley
  • Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", tj Frazir
  • Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap", Mike Speed
• All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, glbrad01
  • Re: All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing, Mark Martin
• Superposition Information Highway, gary
  • Re: Superposition Information Highway, Gregory L. Hansen
• DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Sam Wormley
  • Re: DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE, Peter
• Electromagnetic Equation in to Numerical Form, Magnetics
• What is Lens MTF Test and use it like an film emulsion, mustafa umut sarac
• Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Jonathan Hoyle
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, PD
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Old Man
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Peter
  • Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?, Nick
• Mass and Energy Relationship, rds
  • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, TomGee
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, PD
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, rds
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat
  • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Old Man
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Y.Porat
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld
    • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, hanson
      • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, Schoenfeld
  • Re: Mass and Energy Relationship, romirad2
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 755 November 23, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi, Sam Wormley
• "The Paradox of Zeno", Tleb
  • Re: "The Paradox of Zeno", Sam Wormley
• Where am I ?, Physitrex
  • Re: Where am I ?, donstockbauer
  • Re: Where am I ?, PD
  • Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Where am I ?, tadchem
  • Re: Where am I ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Where am I ?, wgilmour
  • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
    • Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY
      • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
      • Re: Where am I ?, Androcles
      • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
      • Re: Where am I ?, Androcles
      • Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY
      • Re: Where am I ?, Androcles
    • Re: Where am I ?, hanson
    • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where am I ?, hanson
      • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
      • Re: Where am I ?, Androcles
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, Old Man
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY
      • Re: Where am I ?, Androcles
      • Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
      • Re: Where am I ?, LEFTY
      • Re: Where am I ?, tdp1001
• Spacetime and matter, Physitrex
  • Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., Jeff_Relf
    • Re: Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption., donstockbauer
  • Re: Spacetime and matter, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Spacetime and matter, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Spacetime and matter, Mr Clarke
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Androcles
    • Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, donstockbauer
• Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
  • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD
    • Message not available
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Nick
    • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
  • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY
    • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, OsherD
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Androcles
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, LEFTY
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?, donstockbauer
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD
  • Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation, OsherD
• Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, btevans
  • Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Tice with a J
  • Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, mmeron
  • Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem, Old Man
• Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
  • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, donstockbauer
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
    • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Bob Cain
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment, Mathlete
• Re: OT: Are protons really quantum black holes?, donstockbauer
• Gravity Explained!, junoexpress
  • Re: Gravity Explained!, wgilmour
    • Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration
      • Re: Gravity Explained!, Pelastration
      • Re: Gravity Explained!, Mr Clarke
      • Re: Gravity Explained!, Physitrex
  • Re: Gravity Explained!, erik . lentz
• Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy
  • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy
      • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Peter
      • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, physicsboy
      • Message not available
      • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, Autymn D. C.
  • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, PD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Greg Neill
    • Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum, Tice with a J
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), PD
  • Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Gregory L. Hansen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Timo Nieminen
• Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Bob Cain
    • Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Accuracy vs. Relevance, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, donstockbauer
    • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem
  • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R.
    • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, tadchem
      • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R.
      • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Juan R.
      • Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, Eric Gisse
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Tleb
  • Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness", Sam Wormley
• Call for paper in Nanotechnology journal, Nano
• Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Hannes Nagel
  • Re: Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide, Old Man
• help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler
  • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles
  • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, CWatters
      • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler
    • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, R. Pierce Butler
  • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Old Man
    • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Androcles
  • Re: help - how do i calculate this?, Bob Cain
• Theoretical help, natjbrown
  • Re: Theoretical help, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Theoretical help, PD
  • Re: Theoretical help, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Theoretical help, PD
  • Re: Theoretical help, Mark Fergerson
• Re: Two-Billion-Year-Old Surprise Found Beneath The Azores, cnctut
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, donstockbauer
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, LEFTY
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research, OsherD
      • You just can't study nothing !, Once again
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, OsherD
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, Don't ever approach me
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, Nick
      • Re: You just can't study nothing !, LEFTY
• Theory of the day, Physitrex
  • Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex
    • Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Theory of the day, donstockbauer
    • Re: Theory of the day, Old Man
      • Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex
      • Re: Theory of the day, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Theory of the day, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Theory of the day, Old Man
      • Re: Theory of the day, Physitrex
• Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Robert Karl Stonjek
  • Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Androcles
    • Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics, Gregory L. Hansen
• Question from reporter, dru . sefton
  • Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Question from reporter, Igor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Question from reporter, Once again
      • Message not available
      • Re: Question from reporter, Don't ever approach me
      • Message not available
      • Re: Question from reporter, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Message not available
      • Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick
      • Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Question from reporter, PD
      • Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson
      • Re: Question from reporter, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Question from reporter, Mark Fergerson
  • Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Question from reporter, tadchem
      • Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Question from reporter, PD
      • Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Question from reporter, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton
      • Re: Question from reporter, dru . sefton
  • Re: Question from reporter, Androcles
  • Re: Question from reporter, Aetherist
  • Re: Question from reporter, cnctut
    • Re: Question from reporter, donstockbauer
  • Re: Question from reporter, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick
    • Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick
      • Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick
    • Message not available
      • Re: Question from reporter, Andy Resnick
• Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations, tadchem
• Help with Navier Stokes, C_B_Trail
  • Re: Help with Navier Stokes, Puppet_Sock
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Tleb
  • Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", Sam Wormley
    • Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe", donstockbauer
• eprint citations with bibtex, John F
  • Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Bruce Scott TOK
      • Re: eprint citations with bibtex, Timo Nieminen
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull, OsherD
• Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, mustafa umut sarac
  • Re: Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression, Mark Fergerson
• voltage vs current, krishna
  • Re: voltage vs current, Androcles
    • Re: voltage vs current, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: voltage vs current, Doug
  • Re: voltage vs current, John Popelish
  • Re: voltage vs current, CWatters
    • Re: voltage vs current, krishna
• SINGULAR DYNAMICS OF ONE-D-DOUBLE-U, dedanoe
• Frame dragging experiments ???, Robert Finch
  • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, donstockbauer
  • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Physitrex
      • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man
  • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, Old Man
    • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, richard miller
  • Re: Frame dragging experiments ???, franklinhu
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
  • Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005, donstockbauer
• Re: Neutron Lifetime Sets Time for Atom Formation at Big Bang, Jeffrey
• Ampere's law with a long solenoid....., Harry
• Batteries/electricity Safety Question, TribalLot
  • Re: Batteries/electricity Safety Question, Doug
• Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, platopes
  • Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam, CWatters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, Mitch Perkins
    • Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam, CWatters
• Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, juggz
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Androcles
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, franklinhu
    • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, hanson
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler
    • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Igor
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler
    • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Traveler
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
    • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Peter
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
      • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Nick
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Y.Porat
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?, PD
• Magnetic Poles, Graffman
  • Re: Magnetic Poles, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Magnetic Poles, Graffman
      • Re: Magnetic Poles, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Magnetic Poles, Charles
  • Re: Magnetic Poles, RP
  • Re: Magnetic Poles, CWatters
• Lights On - Nobody Home, platopes
  • Re: Lights On - Nobody Home, Sam Wormley
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables, OsherD
• Molecular "cage" hoists atomic cargo, antimatter100
• Spookfeed's movie., Androcles
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, dirk . laureyssens
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions, OsherD
• Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, mustafa umut sarac
  • Re: Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick, tadchem
• Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, mustafa umut sarac
  • Re: Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine, Rene Tschaggelar
• Spring pendulum, curtvon
  • Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon
    • Re: Spring pendulum, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles
    • Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon
      • Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles
      • Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon
      • Re: Spring pendulum, Androcles
      • Re: Spring pendulum, Bob Cain
      • Re: Spring pendulum, truth . . teller
  • Re: Spring pendulum, Harry
    • Re: Spring pendulum, curtvon
      • Re: Spring pendulum, Harry
  • Re: Spring pendulum, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Spring pendulum, John Bailey
• "Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad
  • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley
  • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Sam Wormley
  • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Retic Postings and SPAM", Yad
    • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", donstockbauer
    • Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM", tadchem
• Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, David M. Li
  • Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study, Gregory L. Hansen
• Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", glbrad01
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD
      • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", LEFTY
    • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside", G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., John Decker
  • Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
  • Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
  • Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Bob Cain
    • Message not available
      • Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., Happy Hippy
  • Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC., pete
• Butterfly Wings Share Light Tricks with TV, Sam Wormley
• Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Uno Lapideus
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mark Martin
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Mathlete
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Androcles
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, franklinhu
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler
      • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Traveler
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Old Man
  • Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., Jeff_Relf
    • Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term., LEFTY
      • Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., Jeff_Relf
      • Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., donstockbauer
      • Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical., LEFTY
      • _Physicalism_, Jeff_Relf
      • Re: _Physicalism_, Dogma Discharge
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Orion
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, hanson
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, Nick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• YFE's, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: YFE's, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: YFE's, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Maxwell stress tensor, Tobin Fricke
  • Re: Maxwell stress tensor, Andy Resnick
• Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD
  • Re: Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations, OsherD
• English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers
  • Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Mark Martin
    • Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Stan Byers
      • Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, Doug
  • Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????, John Decker
• If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Mathlete
  • Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, donstockbauer
  • Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?, Igor
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Woleb
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Sam Wormley
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jambaugh
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu
    • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tj Frazir
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", PD
    • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Androcles
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Nick
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu
      • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", tadchem
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", franklinhu
  • Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?", Puppet_Sock
• Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance, donstockbauer
• Problems to Sharpen the Young, Sam Wormley
• Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings, Sam Wormley
• Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett
  • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, PD
    • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett
  • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Androcles
    • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, donstockbauer
    • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett
  • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, PD
    • A photon's Possible_Histories are physical, not notional., Jeff_Relf
  • Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Old Man
  • Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, wfaxon@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles
    • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Old Man
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Androcles
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Bob Cain
      • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment, Paul Cardinale
• An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD
  • Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD
    • Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole, OsherD
• Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, Timo Nieminen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba, mmeron
• Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA, C.J. Luke
  • Photons don't make round trips., Jeff_Relf
• Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD
  • Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD
    • Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD
      • Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents, OsherD
• Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete
  • Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, jambaugh
    • Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion, Mathlete
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 18 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• my two new pages, dedanoe
  • Re: my two new pages, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: my two new pages, Androcles
• Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods 2: Large Exponents, OsherD
• "A Snapshot of a Photon", Woleb
  • Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon", Sam Wormley
• Re: double D time, dedanoe
• The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormhole
  • Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Randy Poe
  • Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: question for the plate tectonically informed, Aidan Karley
• Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer
  • Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer
  • Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer
    • Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE.., donstockbauer
• Liquid Cooling Of Chips: Again popular ?, Robert11
• Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD
  • Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD
    • Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods, OsherD
• Powerful Magnetar Blast from Another Galaxy, Sam Wormley
• Chaos protects networks in Athens, Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of energy, tdennis14@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Early Einstein publications online?, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: Early Einstein publications online?, AES
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, tadchem
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Black Knight
  • Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY, Y.Porat
• Mome