sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Acquiring papers
  • From: Tolman
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: tadchem
• old papers
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: THE MECHANISM
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: panteltje
• The Generalised Born Postulate
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: Hubble
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: THE MECHANISM
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Androcles
• Uncountably Many Outside Universes As Modified Multiverses
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• THE MECHANISM
  • From: Kevan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Toroids
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: Samsong
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: RP
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: photon size
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: ?
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential)
  • From: Old Man
• Origin of forces
  • From: Peter
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Segin
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time
  • From: tadchem
• Dark Energy E = kFL via Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 9: Tensor Dimensional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: Mark-T
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Toroids
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Singapura99
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Toroids
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time
  • From: PD
• Re: Toroids
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glo...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Amount of light from linear floodlamp bulb
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Toroids
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: X84
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record
  • From: Peter
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light slower than CG?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light is a DUAL wave
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Give up Black Holes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: Doug
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How do Black Holes Grow ????
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: FORCE OF GRAVITY IS AN ILLUSION
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: photon size
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: tadchem
• Re: There has never been an earthquake on Thanksgiving
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Toroids
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: String theory?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• I LOVE YOU
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: Hubble
• Re: The Caliber of Debunkers Is Waning
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: donstockbauer
• NEEDED: Equation for pressure drop in a leaking container versus time
  • From: G.L. Cross
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: CWatters
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: ?
• Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: Hubble
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential)
  • From: Harry
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Mathlete
• What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Mike
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 8: Noether-Defined Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's not invisible is the notion that all things consume, Glom_On.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Toroids
  • From: John Popelish
• Toroids
  • From: Greg G
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: hanson
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: Doug
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: String theory?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: String theory?
  • From: ?
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Singapura99
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: String theory?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Energy in the Knowledge Equation 7: Matter, Radiation, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photon size
  • From: Strongheart
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Mike
• Re: photon size: correction
  • From: Old Man
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: Doug
• DOE Sensitive Subjects
  • From: righton20052
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: X84
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 6: Baez and Neumaier
  • From: OsherD
• Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record
  • From: Peter
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: zinnic
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: help!i don't know its name.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Relativistic computation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999
  • From: Androcles
• Relativistic computation
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: help!i don't know its name.
  • From: Brit
• help!i don't know its name.
  • From: vector
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Scientific error from observation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Scientific error from observation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: erik . lentz
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Scientific error from observation
  • From: ?
• Re: photon size
  • From: ?
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: ?
• Re: photon size
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: photon size
  • From: ?
• Scientific error from observation
  • From: deloid
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: hhc314
• About dark matter and dark energy statements for an internet record
  • From: Kwok Man Hui
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5.2 Bose and Dadhich 1999
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Segin
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: String theory?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: photon size
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Question regarding General Relativity and the speed of light
  • From: madscientist5500
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: ?
• String theory?
  • From: ?
• Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: ?
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Any good videos on Copernicus, Kepler, Maxwell, Faraday, etc?
  • From: Robert
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5:1 Carlip
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photon size
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Re: photon size
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: photon size
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Spam - Re - "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: photon size
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: CWatters
• Re: photon size
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• photon size
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: String Theory and "Beauty"
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Androcles
• Sacred geometry and physics
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: THE FORCE OF GRAVITYU IS AN ILLUSION
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: mmeron
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 5: sci.physics.research on Fundamental Nature of Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Segin
• Re: The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: String Theory and "Beauty"
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: K&K Mechanics
  • From: nithyanand
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: djlockdown
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: hhc314
• Desktop Railgun
  • From: Singapura99
• Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?
  • From: jpolasek
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Major problems of Modern Physics
  • From: djlockdown
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Article: On Atom Waves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The Smart Model Theory Website
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Hi, guys.
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: Mr Clarke
• Re: fluid dynamics question
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Spacetime and matter
  • From: Mr Clarke
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Hi, guys.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: don_stockbauer
• Article: On Atom Waves
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: LEFTY
• Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Years Of Posts Made About The Smart Model Shown....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• test to see if new topics are being accepted
  • From: donstockbauer
• The Smart Model Theory Website
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Peter
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 25 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator))
  • From: Parrot Milk
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Photon-particles-observed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photon-particles-observed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator))
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Smart Model - (Under The Guidance Of The Father ( The Creator))
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Androcles
• molecule to gather small groups of atoms and drop them
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 4: p + rho Replaces Mass Density
  • From: OsherD
• How to measure H (magnetic field strength)?
  • From: muknot
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Fusion
  • From: Old Man
• Re: String Theory and "Beauty"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Save your world
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Fusion
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• The Fastest Relativistic Jets: VLBA Observations of Blazars with Apparent Speeds Exceeding 25c
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Nanotube foams are strong and flexible
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tiny swimmer makes a splash
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fusion
  • From: Mark Martin
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 3: The Brazilian Fermion Equations
  • From: OsherD
• fluid dynamics question
  • From: metro414
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions
  • From: OsherD
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation 2: The Brazilians on Fermions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fusion
  • From: jimp
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Is the Proton a Black Hole ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light is being pushed!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light is being pushed!!!
  • From: Nick
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: OsherD
• Fusion
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Light is being pushed!!!
  • From: chris
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Light is being pushed!!!
  • From: Nick
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: tadchem
• Force of Gravity of a 100-solar Mass Lump of Gold
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: hanson
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: romirad2
• Re: Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE
  • From: Peter
• Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap"
  • From: Mike Speed
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Theoretical help
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Light slower than CG?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Light slower than CG?
  • From: Brit
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: joshipura
• Light slower than CG?
  • From: ReGenesis0
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Peter
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: hanson
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• String Theory and "Beauty"
  • From: mike3
• Re: Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Physicists have observed a feature known as a "pseudogap"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: truth . . teller
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Superposition Information Highway
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Old Man
• All gravitational lenses possess the physic of lensing
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Superposition Information Highway
  • From: gary
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: rds
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Bob Cain
• DARK ENERGY AND THE PREPOSTEROUS UNIVERSE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Electromagnetic Equation in to Numerical Form
  • From: Magnetics
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: PD
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: eprint citations with bibtex
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: rds
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: rds
• What is Lens MTF Test and use it like an film emulsion
  • From: mustafa umut sarac
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: PD
• Dark Matter/Energy or Update Gravity?
  • From: Jonathan Hoyle
• Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Mass and Energy Relationship
  • From: rds
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 755 November 23, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: wgilmour
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Spacetime and matter
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Spacetime and matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: eprint citations with bibtex
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: _Physicalism_
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Where am I ?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!
  • From: Androcles
• Gravity is a glomming on, a type of consumption.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Where am I ?
  • From: Physitrex
• Spacetime and matter
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Don't ever approach me
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: Don't ever approach me
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: Nick
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!
  • From: Philip Deitiker
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: franklinhu
• _Physicalism_
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Peter
• Re: Energy In The Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Peter
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: You just can't study nothing !
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: physicsboy
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Incorrect Causal Horizon Definition?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
  • From: LEFTY
• Energy In The Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple Classical Mechanics Problem
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Simple Classical Mechanics Problem
  • From: btevans
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Speed Of Light: A New Experiment
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: OT: Are protons really quantum black holes?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: Pelastration
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: Pelastration
• Re: Gravity Explained!
  • From: wgilmour
• Re: eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: Androcles
• Gravity Explained!
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: physicsboy
• eneergy, batman, friction, and momentum
  • From: rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Old Man
• Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: PD
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: PD
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Re: Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Theoretical help
  • From: PD
• Re: Theoretical help
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Theoretical help
  • From: PD
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Measure the state of quantum bits in a quantum computer without disturbing the state
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Theoretical help
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Accuracy vs. Relevance
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: PD
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Once again
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: LEFTY
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Tleb
• You just can't study nothing !
  • From: Once again
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Maxwell stress tensor
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Igor
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: krishna
• Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Call for paper in Nanotechnology journal
  • From: Nano
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: CWatters
• Multiple gamma peaks for same radionuclide
  • From: Hannes Nagel
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Androcles
• help - how do i calculate this?
  • From: R. Pierce Butler
• Theoretical help
  • From: natjbrown
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Two-Billion-Year-Old Surprise Found Beneath The Azores
  • From: cnctut
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: hanson
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: donstockbauer
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 5: Nothingness Research
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Theory of the day
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam
  • From: CWatters
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Theory of the day
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Physitrex
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: dru . sefton
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: dru . sefton
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Old Man
• Lights On - Nobody Home; Response To Sam
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: PD
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Article: Staff 'crisis' threatens physics
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Question from reporter
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: eprint citations with bibtex
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Question from reporter
  • From: dru . sefton
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Grainy space for Lorentz-transformations
  • From: tadchem
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Harry
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Help with Navier Stokes
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Help with Navier Stokes
  • From: C_B_Trail
• Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?
  • From: BruceS
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: curtvon
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull
  • From: OsherD
• eprint citations with bibtex
  • From: John F
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: Doug
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 4: Universe Acceleration = Internal Pointer + External Pull
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: voltage vs current
  • From: Androcles
• Zone Plate or Pin Sieves shaped for anamorphic image compression
  • From: mustafa umut sarac
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Traveler
• voltage vs current
  • From: krishna
• Re: Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• SINGULAR DYNAMICS OF ONE-D-DOUBLE-U
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Harry
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: curtvon
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: donstockbauer
• Frame dragging experiments ???
  • From: Robert Finch
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, November 21, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Neutron Lifetime Sets Time for Atom Formation at Big Bang
  • From: Jeffrey
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Batteries/electricity Safety Question
  • From: Doug
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Nick
• Ampere's law with a long solenoid.....
  • From: Harry
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: Charles
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: Androcles
• Batteries/electricity Safety Question
  • From: TribalLot
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: RP
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: Graffman
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Androcles
• Lights On - Nobody Home; Response to Sam
  • From: platopes
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: juggz
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lights On - Nobody Home
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnetic Poles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Magnetic Poles
  • From: Graffman
• Lights On - Nobody Home
  • From: platopes
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: curtvon
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables
  • From: OsherD
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 3: Pointers to Dimensions/Variables
  • From: OsherD
• Molecular "cage" hoists atomic cargo
  • From: antimatter100
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Spookfeed's movie.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions
  • From: dirk . laureyssens
• Re: Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Spring pendulum
  • From: curtvon
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Universe Does Have An "Outside" 2: Complex, Quaternions, Octonions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: hanson
• Watch pendulum with magnetic push pull kick
  • From: mustafa umut sarac
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: hanson
• Bladeless Magnetic MHD Turbine
  • From: mustafa umut sarac
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: OsherD
• Spring pendulum
  • From: curtvon
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: jbacsa2
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: LEFTY
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Yad
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Yad
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: pete
• Re: Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Quantizing space breaks up waves
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term.
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Traveler
• Introductory Physics Texts for Self Study
  • From: David M. Li
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: YFE's
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: YFE's
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Universe Does Have An "Outside"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????
  • From: John Decker
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????
  • From: Doug
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: donstockbauer
• Physics Professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC.
  • From: John Decker
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Old Man
• Butterfly Wings Share Light Tricks with TV
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Frazirs foggy bottom
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Uno Lapideus
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• A photon's Possible_Histories are physical, not notional.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Thomson, How can you be so sure a photon has a finite complexity ?
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• YFE's
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Maxwell stress tensor
  • From: Tobin Fricke
• Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????
  • From: Stan Byers
• Re: Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Why Derivatives Usually Occur One Per Term in Physical Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: English to German sci. web pg Translation ????
  • From: Mark Martin
• English to German sci. web pg Translation ????
  • From: Stan Byers
• If Einstein And Minkowski Had Known About Cubic Complex Variables?
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex.
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: Androcles
• Chaos-encrypted information goes the distance
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Problems to Sharpen the Young
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Re: Silly question viz. double-slit experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: PD
• Both a photon and the unverse are infinitely complex.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Photons don't make round trips.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: mwmiller314
• Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Silly question viz. double-slit experiment
  • From: wfaxon@xxxxxxx
• Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: wfaxon@xxxxxxx
• Re: An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Silly question viz. split-screen experiment
  • From: wfaxon@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: franklinhu
• An Infinite-Energy or Infinite-Force Black Hole
  • From: OsherD
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: hanson
• Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Adics the native numbers of Riemann geometry; Eucl = Riem append Loba
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Dr. Unruh: www.Theory.Physics.UBC.CA
  • From: C.J. Luke
• Phase Boundaries Represented by Integer Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A New Relativistic Notion
  • From: Mathlete
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 18 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: hanson
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: my two new pages
  • From: Androcles
• Re: my two new pages
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• my two new pages
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE..
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE..
  • From: donstockbauer
• Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods 2: Large Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE..
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: The anti graviti properties of spaghetti
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: PD
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: double D time
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• The anti graviti properties of spaghetti
  • From: Sam Wormhole
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: question for the plate tectonically informed
  • From: Aidan Karley
• Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: BUSH UNVEILS SMITHSONIAN STATUE..
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Liquid Cooling Of Chips: Again popular ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: joshipura
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods
  • From: OsherD
• Virtual Objects Generalize Via Knowledge Equation Methods
  • From: OsherD
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Lefty
• Powerful Magnetar Blast from Another Galaxy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Lefty
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Lefty
• Chaos protects networks in Athens
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What's simpler than the remnant radiation of the big bang, the CMBR ?
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Early Einstein publications online?
  • From: AES
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: hanson
• Re: Conservation of energy
  • From: tdennis14@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: pete
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Nguyen
• Re: Early Einstein publications online?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION CONSERVES TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: tadchem
• Moment of inertia for rotating tire&wheel
  • From: Nguyen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: T Wake
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Mam, I am BLOG
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course.
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Orion
• Re: CMBR - another explanation
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: temp phys username
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• recent NOVA show on Newton; in defense of Newton
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement
  • From: victorkemp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: Black Knight
• Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms 2: Los Alamos Natl Lab
  • From: OsherD
• Re: equations of motion/inertial measurement
  • From: Doug
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Black Knight
• equations of motion/inertial measurement
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: relather
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: hanson
• Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [QM] Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms
  • From: OsherD
• Knowledge and Dimensional Analysis Illustrate Curious Aspects of Axioms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• [QM] Trying to wrap my brain around...
  • From: dgoldsmith_89
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall...
  • From: T Wake
• Vacuum - what is it?
  • From: Orion
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we'reall...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Wimp
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Rdc
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Orion
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: CMBR - another explanation
  • From: donstockbauer
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Retic
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: jimp
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Cdr
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: temp phys username
• Re: Global poverty - causes
  • From: Orion
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: tadchem
• Program graphs evolution of time, space and mass
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Global poverty - causes
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: A question about lens
  • From: donstockbauer
• A question about lens
  • From: joshipura
• Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• 911, Wtc on MSNBC - Controlled demolition proven again
  • From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New look for optical microscopy
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: periodic table as concentric rings of 16
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship
  • From: OsherD
• An Application for Infrared Scanning?
  • From: mwmiller314
• Determinant-Matrix-PI "Exact" Relationship
  • From: OsherD
• Graduate Level Math Books For Sale
  • From: dgiaimo@xxxxxxxxx
• Global poverty - causes
  • From: Orion
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Orion
• Re: tj says that hanson is a Fucking moron.
  • From: hanson
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all...
  • From: hanson
• Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE
  • From: hanson
• Re: tj says that hanson is a Fucking moron.
  • From: hanson
• New look for optical microscopy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: mmeron
• Re: T_J, How is it that you're such a F_cking genius and we're all ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: xinyongfu
• Research group needs your input
  • From: project . crossover
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Black Knight
• Article: Graphite Found to Exhibit Surprising Quantum Effects
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge 2: Unitary, Random, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Dodging Doomsday With a Space Tug
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: jimp
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: jimp
• Re: T_J has no place to invest.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tj says that hanson is a Fucking moron.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A second great depression
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A second great depression
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: CMBR - another explanation
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: temp phys username
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: Orion
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: krishna
• Re: Biophysics Texts
  • From: The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: kuttu
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Re: "Zombie Physics"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Traces vs Determinants and Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Re: Italy: Corrupt Selection of Academic Staff
  • From: pete
• Re: Gisse, get a better newsreader, and learn how to use it.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: nospam
• tj says that he is a Fucking moron.
  • From: hanson
• tj Frazir's Lame Powerless Engine, his LPE
  • From: hanson
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Gisse, get a better newsreader, and learn how to use it.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Determinants, Knowledge, and PI 2: Determinants of Products and Volumes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: janey3white
• Google's newsreader.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: RP
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: OG
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: can c approach zero?
  • From: Tresa
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Orion
• Re: How do I say these scientific notation terms?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: RP
• Dr. tj Frazir, PhD in physics & math..... from Rusha
  • From: hanson
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Determinants, Knowledge, and PI
  • From: nospam
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: CMBR - another explanation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: patterns on swimming pool floor
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A second great depression
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Biophysics Texts
  • From: The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Eric_Gisse, forget about me.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: patterns on swimming pool floor
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Biophysics Texts
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Voice of Wisdom
• Re: "Zombie Physics"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: CMBR - another explanation
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "Zombie Physics"
  • From: tdp1001
• CMBR - another explanation
  • From: Orion
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Voice of Wisdom
• Re: tell me if my site is visible for you
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 3: More on L
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: krishna
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Frazir gets it right at last!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Each post has it's own thread.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Physics and Astronomy Fun
  • From: Black Knight
• Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM 2: QM
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Frazir gets it right at last!
  • From: tj Frazir
• T_J has a PhD in physics... from where ? !
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: tj Frazir
• Physics and Astronomy Fun
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Biophysics Texts
  • From: The Unstable Concoction of Fascinet
• Knowledge "Operator" Creates Mass, Tensors, and QM
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Illiterate Davd A. Smith
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: They're every where, but why only on earth???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Gun cleaning paraphernalia question
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: fine-man's luck-ters
  • From: oldton
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: fine-man's luck-ters
  • From: Black Knight
• fine-man's luck-ters
  • From: oldton
• Why are some transparent oxides electrically conductive?
  • From: JAH
• Re: How many bits are necessary to store the universe?
  • From: Voice of Wisdom
• Re: help
  • From: oldton
• Re: help
  • From: oldton
• Re: "Zombie Physics"
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded.
  • From: T Wake
• Ken's gravity, Fred's photons
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: mike3
• "Zombie Physics"
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Fan"-driven pendulum simulation?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gisse, Please do something else... anything else.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Gisse, Please do something else... anything else.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Suicide bombers are hideously deluded.
  • From: donstockbauer
• MIT research could clear up foggy problem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Suicide bombers are hideously deluded.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: Osher talks unkOsher about tj Frazir
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: help
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Kinetic Energy Etc
  • From: OG
• Re: Kinetic Energy Etc
  • From: Steven Gray
• The transistor is not applicable in the commericial world.
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Kinetic Energy Etc
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Kinetic Energy Etc
  • From: jclause
• Re: Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge
  • From: Tresa
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Double slit experiment questions A million holes and 1 photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Creation and Annihilation Operators and Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Article: History of Physics - Paul Dirac
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Orion
• Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents 2: P(A-->B) = K
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: PD
• Network math leads to an alternative, simpler ranking scheme
  • From: Sam Wormley
• That's the Way the Spaghetti Crumbles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sound waves target new applications
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir
  • From: hanson
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir
  • From: donstockbauer
• Self-portrait of a Billionaire, tj Frazir
  • From: hanson
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: hanson
• Re: No good deed goes unpunished, but tj do it anyway.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: hanson
• Re: Alternatives to physics Ph.D?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Nonlinear equations
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Nonlinear equations
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What would this look like?
  • From: Black Knight
• Nonlinear equations
  • From: Javier
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: pete
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Hot Metal Glowing.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Old Man
• Why Algebraic Establishment Missed Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: World War II in the Pacific
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• minitaller
  • From: valeri
• minitaller
  • From: valeri
• Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Knowledge Equation Logarithmic Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Galilean referential?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photon-photon interactions
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Help with quantum computing project
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Galilean referential?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: tj is still insane
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help with quantum computing project
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: pete
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Capillary siphon modeling
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: tj is still insane
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Dr Photon
• Capillary siphon modeling
  • From: Tao
• Re: Help with quantum computing project
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Harry
• Transition of weights in distorted equilibrium plane
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: Dr Photon
• Free web-based seminar on spectroscopy
  • From: hannahvfromdublin
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot
  • From: a_plutonium
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: krishna
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: Charles
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Anisotropic 3D space
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What will happen?
  • From: Old Man
• pls ignore
  • From: Tar Baby
• Re: Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: RP
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Old Man
• Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo) - Response to Gary Sokolich
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Help with quantum computing project
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: TomGee
• Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Galilean referential?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Old Man
• Low Enriched Nuclear Bombs
  • From: sidon20051
• Re: Galilean referential?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Anisotropic 3D space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: pete
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design
  • From: hanson
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Galilean referential?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Double slit experiment questions
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: free on line compressible flow book
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: MissSouth
• Re: Beating the sub-wavelength limit
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Kansas redefines science & Stupid design
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Double slit experiment questions
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: virtual photon ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: Dr Photon
• Kansas redefines science & Stupid design
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Kansas redefines science
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo)
  • From: Androcles
• Idiots Design - Idiots Delight -> Intelligent Design
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 753 November 9, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anisotropic 3D space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: $$$$$make tons of cash EASY$$$$$
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Ian Parker
• Galilean referential?
  • From: dreed
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Harry
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Ale
• Re: Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Stupid Design.
  • From: Ale
• Re: What will happen?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: the problem of storing lines/string/wire/hose so they do not knot
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Is Maxwell's demon still alive?
  • From: vector
• Re: virtual photon ?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Infinity Problems in QM
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo)
  • From: tadchem
• virtual photon ?
  • From: DARTH VADER
• What will happen?
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Anisotropic 3D space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Kansas redefines science
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: krishna
• F = m^(c1) a^(c2) Overrides Newton's F = ma for m constant
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: kuttu
• Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 4: px = ?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Astounding conclusion is now virtually inescapable: Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Interferometry in Astronomy--What is Lost?
  • From: Steven Gray
• A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo)
  • From: iwicom
• A Non-friction bicycle lights generator (dynamo)
  • From: iwicom
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: electromagnetism
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Minimum Travel Times to Other Parts of the Universe
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 3: Time As Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold
  • From: T Wake
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball
  • From: PD
• Re: impact resistance
  • From: CWatters
• Re: tj's 1st peddler attempt with Gold
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: impact resistance
  • From: Turman
• Re: impact resistance
  • From: Turman
• Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson
  • From: Mark Edwards
• Re: Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball
  • From: tadchem
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: PD
• Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Impact of bat or club speed on flight of a ball
  • From: john0714@xxxxxxx
• Re: impact resistance
  • From: CWatters
• Re: impact resistance
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• impact resistance
  • From: Turman
• impact resistance
  • From: Turman
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: David Canzi -- non-mailable
• Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: mmeron
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: PD
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: PD
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: PD
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: 911 physics. War on terror fraud.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics?
  • From: Orion
• Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: jcon
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: vector
• Re: E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• E**2=m**2+p**2?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: mmeron
• What happens when space expands?
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: Ian Parker
• confusing page on Wien's displacement; also question between matter-energy and radiation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Knowledge Equation With Variable Exponents
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger
  • From: OsherD
• Naked Singularity Via Reissner-Nordstrom and Gibbons-Maeda-Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger
  • From: OsherD
• Re: space probe query
  • From: jambaugh
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: jambaugh
• Feynman on video?
  • From: Brett
• Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?
  • From: hanson
• Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?
  • From: Jason Lang
• Re: Photon-photon interactions
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Photon-photon interactions
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details
  • From: donstockbauer
• Budiyono and Doctorow Independently Converge on Knowledge 2: Details
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• tj's 3rd peddler attempt on hanson
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gravitational Waves
  • From: bartoszszczesny@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reciprocal Real Numbers
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Uncle Al found dead in suburban LA
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Freedom is notional. _Unmeasurables_
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: space probe query
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Gravitational Waves
  • From: matt271829-news
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• space probe query
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: dark matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The weight of a body's mass varies with location too
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the purpose of quantizing space?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: 'REVOLUTIONARY' NEW PROOF OF 'YOUNG' UNIVERSE? Or not?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Photon-photon interactions
  • From: mark . hagerman
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Is this quantity an "action"?
  • From: junoexpress
• tj's 2nd peddler attempt on hanson
  • From: hanson
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: brodix
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: brodix
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: pete
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: brodix
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy
  • From: macromitch
• Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science
  • From: shuba
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Old Man
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy 2: Knowledge vs Mass
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: killfile notice ha Hanson
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science
  • From: StpNrrs
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Hubble Prospects For Resources on The Moon
  • From: Mike
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Charles
• Knowledge Increase in Universe Counteracts Entropy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: All Systems
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Dirk, There is no math God.
  • From: brodix
• Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 3: Solving for Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: killfile notice ha Hanson
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: hanson
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Getting Burned by Bad Science
  • From: Attila the Bum
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Question: about relation between particle exchange symmetry and angular momentum
  • From: dreameration
• Does space flow out of galactic clusters?
  • From: David Wimp
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Stephen Hawking's thoughts on God.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Climbing a Watery Slope
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Digital communications -- zeroing in on the perfect code
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: All Systems
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What is dark matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light structures
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: killfile notice ha Hanson
  • From: T Wake
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Mass vs inertia
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 4 November 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Einstein paper turns up on arXiv
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• strange-hi fi sci.
  • From: daksh
• strange-hi fi sci.
  • From: daksh
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: kuttu
• Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: cutescience
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: kuttu
• Re: Mystery of a Coin
  • From: CWatters
• Does Stephen Hawking himself believes in god?
  • From: payam79bb@xxxxxxxxx
• Mystery of a Coin
  • From: kuttu
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: Allen L. Barker
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations
  • From: OsherD
• Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again 2: Interrelations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: FakeName
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Corruption of Theoretical Science
  • From: TomGee
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: OsherD
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: jcon
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again
  • From: OsherD
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dimensions (10, 11, 24, 26, etc.) Up In The Air Again
  • From: OsherD
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 4 Nov 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why is it believed there a BIg Bang singularity ?
  • From: blackboab
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: markwh04
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: hanson
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: T Wake
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• How to determine the scale of an arbitrary object.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure
  • From: Lefty
• Re: wake and martin HA HA HA morons shut up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Cut medicade 35 bil give ol boss 70 bil same day fascim
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork Moon's First Restrant
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Bottlecap-tire pessure
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does one measure a mere perception ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: the behind closed doors fascim tricks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Cut medicade 35 bil give ol boss 70 bil same day fascim
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: the chopstick and fork can from china others used hands
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunt...
  • From: maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?
  • From: maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lorentz contraction
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Lorentz contruction
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: the chopstick is inferior to the fork
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can you get out of a black hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: killfile notice
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: mmeron
• Re: wake and hus dumbfucks knock lpe but wont disscuss it
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: TomGee
• Ordinarily, every particle in quantum theory is neatly classified as either a boson or a fermion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: easyer question wake and martin FUCK YOU
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: easyer question wake and martin FUCK YOU
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Fourier analysis Q
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: tadchem
• Fourier analysis Q
  • From: bill
• Re: Quantum Mechanics calculations for an undergraduate?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: I give you my dynamic lever
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: tadchem
• the law agrees that the agreement doesn't belong in the group of laws
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: I give you my dynamic lever
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Claudio Grondi
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Androcles
• Professor: WTC-7 collapse story defies laws of physics
  • From: Allen L. Barker
• Re: quantum consciousness idiocy
  • From: platopes
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• I give you my dynamic lever
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: platopes
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Full Name
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: quantum consciousness idiocy
  • From: examachine
• Re: uncertainty, wave function
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Hypothetical Questions Regarding the Inner Ear and Heat
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: easyer question Americans fear to answer gov may punnish
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Impossible
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: easyer question NOW THEY SHUT UP
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Tired of Theories of everything, read this and get your own conclusion.
  • From: Hector
• Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: You SHOW me the first tower hit vidio then
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Impossible
  • From: EugeniuszW
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: quantum consciousness idiocy
  • From: ethon
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: ethon
• Re: quantum consciousness idiocy
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: uncertainty, wave function
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: uncertainty, wave function
  • From: Old Man
• Re: pole star
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Left_Over density from the nominal start of the big bang.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Take my flu shot ... please!
  • From: tj Frazir
• quantum consciousness idiocy
  • From: examachine
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a PROVE IT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: easyer question for dumbfucking wake and martin
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: George_Hammond cant be too bad what about you
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why is there something instead of nothing?
  • From: Nick
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron
  • From: T Wake
• Re: uncertainty, wave function
  • From: Nick
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: PD
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: PD
• Re: Thoughts on time and space
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Take my flu shot ... please!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA'S HUBBLE REVEALS POSSIBLE NEW MOONS AROUND PLUTO
  • From: Androcles
• Riccati-izable and Painleve-izable Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• uncertainty, wave function
  • From: gmarkowsky
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 752 November 2, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir is in NEED of maths lessons
  • From: T Wake
• Re: TJ FRAZIR is a moron
  • From: T Wake
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: PD
• Thoughts on time and space
  • From: brodix
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Lagrangian
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Claudio Grondi
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: tj Frazir
• tj Frazir's con has FAILED
  • From: hanson
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: PD
• Re: Radioactive Decay, an effect without cause?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: PD
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: BIG BANG
  • From: tadchem
• BIG BANG
  • From: Dogma Discharge
• Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
  • From: Javier Bezos
• Re: tj Frazir is in NEED of money
  • From: tj Frazir
• Dynamics equally insane with Kinetics
  • From: dedanoe
• Call it how you please!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Neutrinos could close the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantizing space breaks up waves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• pole star
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Working Wrong Concepts
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Physics Today: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: Harry
• Re: They're vectors, but they're not Cartesian.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: You've really blown your nut frazer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physics Today: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Initiated Are Preparing Zombies for the Worst
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bush hit the towers FACT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tj Frazir is no fool
  • From: tj Frazir
• tj Frazir is no fool
  • From: hanson
• Re: Bush hit the towers FACT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bush hit the towers FACT
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Just a millimeter
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Lagrangian
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: your ill differentiation makes every velocity constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Left_Over density from the nominal start of the big bang.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: tj Frazir is a fool
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir is a fool
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Unified Field Theory Requires Unified Spacetime Geometry: Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz Spacetime
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: Tolman
• Re: your ill differentiation makes every velocity constant
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Reciprocal Real Numbers
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: PD
• Re: your ill differentiation makes every velocity constant
  • From: zod
• Re: Entropy and the "big bang"
  • From: PD
• your ill differentiation makes every velocity constant
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: NASA'S HUBBLE REVEALS POSSIBLE NEW MOONS AROUND PLUTO
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What's the difference between fulcrum and weight in your common understanding of you know what?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Orion
• Re: They're vectors, but they're not Cartesian.
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: Tolman
• Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?
  • From: dean
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reciprocal Real Numbers
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Probability of the universe
  • From: Tolman
• Re: Physics Today: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: zod
• Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?
  • From: dean
• Re: Gravitons
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Some astro questions
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: HUP Says We Lack Quantum Knowledge/Perception, So Can't Be Used As Explanation
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Bush hit the towers FACT
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does a passing black hole affect the event horizon and contents of another?
  • From: Mike
• Re: How much money do string theorists make?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitons
  • From: Igor
• Exponential Models Outperform Logarithmic Models in Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is physics a dead science?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Careers in Physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How much money do string theorists make?
  • From: PD
• Re: Frazir continues to humiliate himself.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Frazir continues to humiliate himself.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Gravitons
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Frazir continues to humiliate himself.
  • From: T Wake