Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
- From: "Javier Bezos" <see_below_no_spam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Nov 2005 05:54:38 -0800
Juan R.:
I've come across your post when Googling the newsgroups.
This will be my last word except if you stop this flame and
rectify.
> The UNJUSTICE was that Bezos argued that i manipulated
> quotes and that the Pauli quote that i cited had been
> manipulated by me.
1) I never claimed you changed or manipulated the quote.
NEVER EVER. This is FALSE. (I think you have been influenced
by the meaning of the Spanish word "truncar", which has
indeed very negative connotations. This word is very
similar to the English "truncate", but they are not the
same.)
2) Don't blame me by the moderators decision to ban you.
I'm not responsible for their decisions. Anyone can see I'm
willing to admit an error and to rectify. I'm willing to
admit my wording was not very fortunate, but I'll never
admit I said something I never said.
3) You have not provided yet a reference to see the context
_where Pauli said that_, which is what I was asking for to
see the true intentions of him. What we have is just an
extract (which by definition implies the original text has
been truncated somehow) you have taken literally from a
paper and which you have repeated over and over again like a
stuck record so that I have almost learnt it by heart. If
you don't know where Pauli said that (and _not_ where you
took the quote from) or the context just say something like
"I took the quote from that paper, but it in turn doesn't
give any reference either" instead of digging in with a
flame.
4) Go and buy a copy of Pauli's book (it's Dover, therefore
it's cheap). Read the Preface, but read as well the notes
he wrote in 1956 -- 24 pages where the name of Poincaré
doesn't appear at all (on the contrary, he says his original
attribution to Schwarzschild and Poincaré of the Lorenzt
invariance of the action integral was a historical mistake
since it was stablished by Larmor in 1900; see p. 216).
I'm just trying to understand the _apparent_ contradiction
between your quote and this book and the only way to do that
is if I (we) have the proper context and, therefore, the
original reference of the quote.
Javier
-----------------------------
http://www.texytipografia.com
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: tj Frazir is in NEED of money
- Next by Date: BIG BANG
- Previous by thread: Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
- Next by thread: Re: moderators at sci.physics.research promote personal attack to people with 'different ideas'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
