Re: Thoughts on time and space


brodix wrote:
> What if Albert Einstein didn't apply the basic concept of relativity
> to time?

Well Einstein didn't. Newton applied Galileo's
Concept of relativity to time.

Einsrein applied the concept of relativity to Mercury.



> The notion of time as a dimension is based on the irreversibility of
> events, which creates our sense of past, present and future. The
> assumption is that there is no corresponding opposite direction to
> provide symmetry.

That's why anti-matter destroyed the Relativity
Dreamland so quickly though.

It made the entire concepts of past, present, and futire
only relevent to The Physics McDonald's dimensional
analysis quacks and Hollywood.










> A very simple and basic point has been overlooked here; While the
> arrow of time for the observer proceeds from past events to future
> ones, the arrow of time for these circumstances proceeds from being in
> the future, to being in the past. Content and context go in opposite
> directions. To the hands of the clock, it is the face going
> counterclockwise.
>
> Time isn't a dimension because the frame of reference does not
> constitute an absolute against which the point of reference transcribes
> another dimension. It is a process in which the point and frame move
> relative to their respective influence on one another.
>
> Reality consists of energy recording information. As the amount of
> energy remains the same, old information is erased as new is recorded.
> This information is a product of relationships of the manifest energy.
> As there is no absolute frame, any action is balanced by an "equal and
> opposite" reaction. Explicit reality is the energy. Time is only a
> function of the information. "Past" and "future" do not exist because
> the energy to manifest them is currently tied up in the present. Time
> travel would require speeding up or reversing the entire universe.

But Black Holes don't allow even travel to exist.
So the question of time travel is no more impossible
than space travel.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unified Field, Special Relativity
    ... quantisation of an energy matter neither along the nature, ... A Discussion of Special Relativity ... scientists will be found turning back to Einstein again ... takes for the beam of light to travel from clock 'a' to clock 'b' (Tb- ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Potential energy in Einsteins 1905 Relativity
    ... relationship from the Principle of Relativity (PoR, ... Jun 30 paper) and the Principle of Energy (PoE, ... I am referring to an historic fact, Einstein use ... inaplicability of potential energy in relativity is that you don't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: black holes made of light?
    ... then that container ought to show an increased effective gravitational ... This is why your relativity book is worthless. ... Energy gravitates. ... E=mc^2 doesn't have to be derived assuming the absence of gravitation, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Einsteins Sep27 1905 paper
    ... What energy is refering Einstein here? ... The name "Special Relativity" was stated ... exclusion, gravity, electricity or any other. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Potential energy in Einsteins 1905 Relativity
    ... relationship from the Principle of Relativity (PoR, ... Jun 30 paper) and the Principle of Energy (PoE, ... measuring rest mass its potential energy. ... inaplicability of potential energy in relativity is that you don't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast