Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?


PD wrote:
> maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Bill Hobba wrote:
> >
> > > "maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <StpNrrs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > The equivalence of
> > > > matter and energy (as proved by Einstein)
> >
> > > That is not what Einstein proved - he showed that mass is a form of energy
> > > but not that energy is a form of mass.
> >
> > I thought he had proved that matter and energy are equivalent in the
> > equation e = mc^2, but if you want to quibble ...
> >
>
> First of all, the m in the right-hand side is mass, not matter. The two
> are *not* the same. Secondly, energy and mass are *properties*, not
> "stuff" in the conventional sense. Einstein showed that there is energy
> content by virtue of something having mass.
>
> PD

What Stephen seems to be proposing is that the right side (including
the mass) is being doubly formed, and after that, no matter will exist.
But bearing in mind that the energy used to exist but no longer
exists, and that the property does not yet exist, how can the sense of
the side first exist, if it has been proven from a non-existent
property? The side does not consist in the first sense, and our last
right side will have ceased to exist. The content is shown secondly to
give the convention that no first matter has ever existed - the last
right side must be the 'stuff' of the first, eternally same side. :)

.

Quantcast