Low Enriched Nuclear Bombs
- From: sidon20051@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Nov 2005 15:12:38 -0800
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2003-02-26-nuke-threat-cover_x.htm
Here is a link to the three year old news of Senator Bidens nuclear
bomb. This article comments on the technology to cause all nuclear
science to be voided.
A low enriched nuke is possible. And the car sized LLNL design is a
typical design limit.
So spout on scientist. And the reality is your stupidity.
These days the abstract secure classfied form is in predicate. So the
writing about the subject in predicate allows the abstract form reader
to infer your subject. A knowledge of the existence of this class of
weapon is classfied. And the writer simply reports the abstract
implication. Talking as the scientist trying to make the compartment is
dangerous if they are not sophisticated.
This is only semianonymous btw.
I live near DC and wish the target was New York.
I do want to know why people spout so grandly as the know it all bomb
maker and all of a sudden Senator Biden has a new class of nuke.
So all the bomb design web sites are out of date and need to be updated
to this new design. There are so many bomb websites that the nuclear
bomb is evidently Patriot Act exempt.
So the threat status of the real terrorrist nuclear device is to be
assumed high.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Galilean referential?
- Next by Date: Re: Double slit experiment questions
- Previous by thread: Re: free on line compressible flow book
- Next by thread: Budiyono K = 1/M and M = K^2 Variations From Knowledge Equation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|