Re: Galilean referential?

Androcles wrote:
> "Puppet_Sock" <puppet_sock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1131575555.895240.46110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Androcles wrote:
> >> "Puppet_Sock" <puppet_sock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:1131562300.423190.303350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > dreed wrote:
> >> >> If anybody knows or can tell me the definition of what is galilean
> >> >> referential
> >> >> I would be most grateful. Or where to find something useful about it.
> >> >
> >> > Do you mean Galilean relativity? If so, that's just the form of
> >> > relativity
> >> > that everybody is aware of from a very young age. Velocities add as
> >> > vectors, time and space are absolutes, and so on. If all velocities are
> >> > very small fractions of the speed of light, and if you can ignore
> >> > gravity,
> >> > then Einstein's relativity is well approximated by Galilean relativity.
> >> > Socks
> >>
> >> Nonsense.
> >> Where on earth did you get the idea that Galileo ignored gravity?
> >
> > Where did you get the idea I said he did?
>
> "and if you can ignore gravity," -- Puppet ***.
> Why bring it up, fuckwit?
>
>
> > Christ you're a fuckwit.
> > Socks
> I'm not a snipping *** like you, though, fuckwit.
> The idiot glory seeker Einstein wrote his own nonsense rules you
> swallowed his line of bull*** hook line and sinker, didn't you?
> Jesus H. Arsehole you're a moron, Puppet ***.

What a sad, pathetic, immitation of a human you are.

Why bring it up? Because, when you can ignore gravity you have the
weak field limit. Note that I did not say what to do when you can't
ignore gravity. Nor did I say that Galileo ignores gravity. Nor that
*anybody* ignores gravity. I said *when you can* ignore gravity
then a result follows. It does.

Now go away and be ashamed as you deserve. As usual.
Socks

.