Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: "David Thomson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Nov 2005 17:29:52 -0800
In the December issue of Scientific American, a front page article by
Jacobsen and Parentani suggests that there is a quantum Aether and that
SR may, in fact, be wrong. They are presently looking for a way to
quantify this Aether. They need look no further than our paper, A New
Foundation for Physics:
http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
With a heavy hitter like Scientific American giving the benefit of the
doubt to a quantified Aether theory, you may all witness the success of
the Aether Physics Model within the next year as more scientists take a
closer look at it.
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: relather
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Wimp
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Wimp
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Wimp
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Wimp
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Happy Hippy
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: nospam
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Prev by Date: Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
- Next by Date: Re: can c approach zero?
- Previous by thread: Re: can c approach zero?
- Next by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading