Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: "David Thomson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Nov 2005 06:29:48 -0800
> You see, you've this people sincerely believing that they've the
> brain power to understand anything worth understanding. Yet, they
> cannot comprehend relativity. It doesn't "make sense" to them. So,
> they have the choice, either accept the fact that their brainpower
> isn't quite up to par, or keep fervently believing that no, they are
> very smart, only relativity is false and that's why it "makes no
> sense". Guess which option they pick?
Is that the full extent of your critical reasoning skills? How do you
explain the fact that Jacobson and Parentani are both physics
professors at well respected Universities and are the ones questioning
SR and proposing the Aether?
Have you read the article?
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- References:
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Helmut Wabnig
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: mmeron
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Prev by Date: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by Date: Re: The speed of light is always local, with local causes, of course.
- Previous by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Index(es):
Loading