Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists

> Your biased point of view must be misrepresenting what Jacobson and
> Parentani are suggesting. But since we can't see the article or even
> what they said, all we have to go on is your word.

http://www.sciamdigital.com/

The article is clearly available. I was able to download a copy of it.
As I said in the first message of this thread, it is the December
issue.

There is an Aether:
http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf

Dave

.

Loading