Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Nov 2005 21:42:43 -0800
For those who would like to view the Sci Am article, you cannot do it
online. I just got my December 2005 issue and the article is titled "An
ECHO of Black Holes". You cannot get it online without paying a $36
subscription fee to Sci Am. They did reference the original paper which
you can look at:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0204/0204079.pdf
As the title would suggest, this is more about the mechanics of black
holes than a discussion of the existence of the aether. The main point
is that some of the mechanics of black holes can be explained in terms
of fluid behaviors. We should be able to produce black-hole like
phenomenon using fluid experiments. The point is that since a fluid
model can help explain black hole phenomenon and since a fluid consists
of individual molecular grains, then space may also consist of 'grains'
or 'particles'. Empy space may not be continuous as assumed by current
theory. It is these 'particles' that suggest the existence of the
aether. Here is a quote from the article:
"The work suggests that spacetime may, like a material fluid, be
granular and possess a preferred frame of reference that manifests
itself on fine scales - contray to Einstein's assumptions."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- References:
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Prev by Date: Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 754 November 16, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
- Next by Date: Powerful Magnetar Blast from Another Galaxy
- Previous by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Index(es):