Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists

> Of course I could be wrong. Why don't you distinguish yourself from the
> rest of the cranks by using your theory to accurately replicate
> something simple, like a static uncharged blackhole?

Is that what cranks do, model static uncharged blackholes? My theory
suggests that black holes are implosion events, not physical objects.
Black holes would only exist for a few seconds, and then completely
disappear from physical reality. But that is not the basis for the
Aether Physics Model. The basis for the Aether Physics Model is that
it quantifies the Aether, the subatomic particles and the forces that
act on them.

Why don't you distinguish yourself from your peers and discover
something useful like a Unified Force Theory that unifies all the
forces?

Dave

.