Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- From: Jeff_Relf <Me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Nov 2005 11:04:58 GMT
Hi Lefty, I wrote:
As for what the gravitational field might be...
I posit that it's a remnant of a once denser universe.
Protons too are likely remnant densities, although their densities are unknown.
Never having complete information, many things seem random to us,
like they're in a casino where they can only win in the short run,
but must lose in the long run.
And you replied:
Exact initial conditions are forever locked away in
sub-Planck realm, all you'll ever get is an approximate "knowledge" of
actual initial conditions, and that's all that nature ever gets too.
Nature doesn't need knowledge of the initial conditions or anything else,
it just does what it does, physical processes determine absolutely everything.
You added:
You could argue that pure randomness is absurd,
and also that pure order is also absurd
so that neither could possibly exist whether in physics or even in math.
Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- From: LEFTY
- Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- From: donstockbauer
- Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- References:
- Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
- From: Uno Lapideus
- Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term.
- From: Jeff_Relf
- Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term.
- From: LEFTY
- Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
- Prev by Date: Call for paper in Nanotechnology journal
- Next by Date: Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- Previous by thread: Re: Things consume, glom on, gravitate, in the sort term.
- Next by thread: Re: Order_Randomness is notional, not physical.
- Index(es):