Re: Theoretical help
- From: Mark Fergerson <nunya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:24:46 -0700
natjbrown@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm writing a short science fiction story, and I need some help. There is a force attacking earth, and they have mastered artificial gravity, plasma weaponry/drives, fusion power plants, and FTL communication. (Einstein's theory of relativity, like Newton's laws before him, have been found to have certain limits.)
I'm more interested in _why_ they're attacking Earth; what could we possibly have that they want that isn't easier to get elsewhere without wasting time/energy/lives on a fight?
We discover how to duplicate these alien technologies, and we mesh them with our existing technologies to develop new technologies. What technologies could we develop?
Technology is just applied physics; if we see things they missed in the physics, damn near anything. Frinst, can their physics be reworked to give monopolar repulsive gravity fields? If so, a ZPF tap is possible.
For the purpose of artificial gravity, they have found a way to generate gravitons. They can be unidirectional, and can be generated some distance from the generator, although with a steep drop-off. In other words, you can generate gravity to pull your ship forward, or to pull a bullet to the side so it misses you, but it takes an insurmountable amount of power to generate gravity any significant distance away.
If they've _really_ "mastered artificial gravity", there's no such power limit; just make and use a Kerr-Newman black hole as a "battery" (Google "Charles Sheffield").
Also, that "steep drop-off" is likely due to their particular technological embodiment of the basic physics; a different embodiment probably would have better range though it might force other tradeoffs (like the differences between a land-speed record car and a SUV).
The difference between a plasma weapon and a plasma drive is simply in where it is aimed, and how dispersed the spray is.
If they can generate gravity, they don't need plasma weaponry/drive tech. Well, I wouldn't.
The main new weapon that I have thought of is a graser, a "graviton laser", also known as a gravity lance. Got any other good ideas? Could we pulse radiation through a gravity lense to form some kind of weapon? Focus the results of a nuclear or atomic bomb? Focus an electromagnetic pulse into a beam?
You're working very old territory here. Read some Sheffield, then check out Robert L. Forward's _Dragon's Egg_ series.
Meantime, try asking in rec.arts.sf.science for more useful ideas and dead ends to avoid.
Mark L. Fergerson
.
- References:
- Theoretical help
- From: natjbrown
- Theoretical help
- Prev by Date: Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance
- Next by Date: Re: Mass and Energy Relationship
- Previous by thread: Re: Theoretical help
- Next by thread: help - how do i calculate this?
- Index(es):