sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: infrared
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: infrared
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: infrared
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• infrared
  • From: bob
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Fireman's insurance fraud -- no, don't
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Looking at the Earth's tiniest particles to explain the mysteries of the cosmos
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Found the answer for difference between Manometer and Hydraulic Press
  • From: guskz
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Waves
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: CNN jumps the shark...
  • From: tj Frazir
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Humidity: RH Or Absolute ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: tadchem
• ±≠–—
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Humidity: RH Or Absolute ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: hanson
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: srp
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: hanson
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: curses
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• leverian unification and the three types of interaction
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Waves
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Shadowlands and QM? Infinite Universe and Weirdness?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Shadowlands and QM? Infinite Universe and Weirdness?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: John
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: John
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: John
• Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005
  • From: John
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: hanson
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: One Probable Fallacy Of Observation And Those Deductions Made Strictly From Observation
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: how does keep track of direction in space flight?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• What cranks have been run out of this group?
  • From: PD
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Waves
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Negative pressure question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Negative pressure question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: Fermi Problem of the Day, # 2, 12-30-2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Invalidity of General Theory of Relativity
  • From: tj Frazir
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 30 Dec 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: markwh04
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Negative pressure question
  • From: flint@xxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: PD
• Re-Simplified: Mixed up between Hydraulic & Atmospheric Pressure on Fluids?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Space and entanglement
  • From: srp
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: hanson
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: rusty
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Negative pressure question
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: nick.ascione@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: chuckles
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Negative pressure question
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: PD
• Re: Absolute size.
  • From: PD
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mirrors
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Mirrors
  • From: nick.ascione@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Deep question
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Negative pressure question
  • From: flint
• One Probable Fallacy Of Observation And Those Deductions Made Strictly From Observation
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Absolute size.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Absolute size.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: GPS and satellite clocks
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Waves
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Energy Loss in an Isolated Hydrogen Atom
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift.
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Charles
• Re: Deep question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Read this carefully: (Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Space and entanglement
  • From: Johan
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Geometry-Dependent Temperature
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Absolute size.
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Absolute size.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Absolute size.
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 9/11 Update: Listen to the WTC floor collapses (911Eyewitness)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Microwave Boilers : Investors Wanted : The Microwave Hot Water...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gun angle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gun angle
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Natural gravitation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Firema...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: Raymond Ronald Karczewski, don't report Jaimie Eckles/dr.Firema...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Light for Students optical vintage book 1902 FA
  • From: JaneyP
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: BNAG THAT BANK
  • From: John
• Re: dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: BNAG THAT BANK
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction
  • From: PD
• Re: A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• BNAG THAT BANK
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Re: Deep question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy Loss in an Isolated Hydrogen Atom
  • From: srp
• Re: Waves
  • From: srp
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Greysky
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Deep question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Waves
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Energy Loss in an Isolated Hydrogen Atom
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• A question regarding opposing vectors and rolling friction
  • From: brian452
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Deep question
  • From: John
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Deep question
  • From: John
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: namlohip
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: curses
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: Uncle Al
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Uncle Al
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Deep question
  • From: John
• Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem
  • From: Tomas Selnekovic
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Waves
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: PD
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Waves
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Deep question
  • From: Mike
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Waves
  • From: PD
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: jesper pedersen
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: PD
• Waves
  • From: oisin
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Deep question
  • From: tdp1001
• frequency division multiplexing - many waves down a wire!?!
  • From: q_q_anonymous
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Inverse pendulum on a cart problem
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: twin paradox in a void?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• dear fegets and other sorts of cocksuckers
  • From: dedanoe
• twin paradox in a void?
  • From: sbs
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: slavek krepelka
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: gun angle
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: jimp
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: srp
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: slavek krepelka
• Black Hole Probability-Logic 3: Riccati Differential Equation Control-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Tony
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: jimp
• Explain Law ofCOnservation of Matter and Energy
  • From: Drifta12
• Re: gun angle
  • From: jimp
• Re: Newton Second Law of Motion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Microwave Boilers : Investors Wanted : The Microwave Hot Water Boiler Heating System Company Increased Thermionic Emissions 1000x high energy electrons
  • From: Br Dan Izzo
• Inverse pendulum on a cart problem
  • From: Tomas Selnekovic
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Tony
• Re: gun angle
  • From: mike123106
• Re: gun angle
  • From: PD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: jimp
• Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime
  • From: MobyDikc
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Skrow
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Pope Calls for a New World Order
  • From: donstockbauer
• Black Hole Probability-Logic 2: Radiation vs Matter Difference Arises
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: gun angle
  • From: hfs2
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Boy Seattle's Donny Carlito
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Tony
• Re: Black Hole Probability-Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Black Hole Probability-Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: hfs2
• Re: Supplement to the paper on black holes
  • From: PD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Potter's annual Christmas gift.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Saints Unnamed on 1-27-05
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Wasps sniff out explosives, "Bird Flu", etc.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: PD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gun angle
  • From: PD
• Re: gun angle
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: gun angle
  • From: donstockbauer
• Vision Development:Cosmology
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: gun angle
  • From: hfs2
• Re: gun angle
  • From: PD
• gun angle
  • From: hfs2
• Shadowlands and QM? Infinite Universe and Weirdness?
  • From: glbrad01
• Potter's annual Christmas gift.
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics
  • From: OsherD
• GCCPKTD: GeometroCombinoControlProbabilityKnowledgeTopoDynamics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Saints Unnamed on 1-27-05
  • From: urelian
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: srp
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: cornofstarchy
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: MadDogR75
• Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment
  • From: Mike
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment
  • From: chuckles
• Re: water pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: PD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: water pressure
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: PD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment
  • From: srp
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: chuckles
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: donstockbauer
• Collapse of the wavefunction during the double slit experiment
  • From: chuckles
• Re: water pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: water pressure
  • From: tj Frazir
• You cannot observe anything without affecting it.
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is there anyone here who doesn't know what MDT stands for? MDT...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Covariance in error analysis.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: water pressure
  • From: PD
• Re: Look for active plasma group
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: PD
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Egap
• dedanoe's double denial
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: THE Idiot Le Turd leaving Soon (again)
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Dr . Lead
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Nice article on Quantum mechanics and EPR and BS and cats on nytimes.com
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about photons
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Nature of dark matter and dark energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: hanson
• Question about photons
  • From: cornofstarchy
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz
  • From: donstockbauer
• American Buddhism - Critique of Science - Quotations by Dr. Frederick Lenz
  • From: ramaquotes
• Re: String langscapes and vacuum decay
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: water pressure
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A new TOE: Spring theory explains everything
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• qm2 highlights 2001-2005
  • From: vznuri
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: water pressure
  • From: jimp
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantized Elevator Gedankenexperiment?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: MICROSATELLITES; how small? How cheap?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Dr . Lead
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: time-varying dynamic system
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Dr . Lead
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sub-Planck scales
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Dr . Lead
• Re: Sub-Planck scales
  • From: Happy Hippy
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Richard Henry
• How to make this clean water generator radiation free?
  • From: Dr . Lead
• Re: The physics of a vagina ...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Physics of Santa Claus
  • From: Androcles
• Astronomers Gain Clues About Fundamental Physics
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: THE GREAT SYDNEY QUAKE _Critical Window Opening Soon_ !!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• New Horizons spacecraft
  • From: Mike Jr.
• podcast_plasma_thruster
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Superstring Life Theory
  • From: charbot
• Re: String langscapes and vacuum decay
  • From: tadchem
• Superstring Life Theory
  • From: glbrad01
• Superstring Life Theory
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?
  • From: freezer
• String langscapes and vacuum decay
  • From: Russell Wallace
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 26, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: water pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sub-Planck scales
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sub-Planck scales
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Eric Gisse
• my argument with the authorities
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: newbie question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: time-varying dynamic system
  • From: robert . w . adams
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Michael Faraday
  • From: Badduh
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: tadchem
• Michael Faraday
  • From: Mkajuma
• Re: newbie question
  • From: srp
• Re: Great Circle Questions
  • From: Dr. Di
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: Mark Martin
• Look for active plasma group
  • From: mustafa umut sarac
• Great Circle Questions
  • From: Robert11
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Elgnis
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Eric Gisse
• A new TOE: Spring theory explains everything
  • From: Prof . Chi M . Panzee
• Re: water pressure
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 10: Geometrodynamics and Einstein-Aether Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 9: Superstring/Brane Vibration Can Be Regarded As Geometric-Topological Change
  • From: OsherD
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 9: Superstring/Brane Vibration Can Be Regarded As Geometric-Topological Change
  • From: OsherD
• Re: newbie question
  • From: Buddah
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: water pressure
  • From: kaatucan@xxxxxxxxx
• newbie question
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: The Hymn of Einstein's Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• water pressure
  • From: Adnan
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: moatesim
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Elgnis
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• From "Science News" of the Year 2005
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: donstockbauer
• The [Not] Most Obvious Thing About Space....
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: Y.Porat
• The Physics of Santa Claus
  • From: Zenflow
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: e = mc^2 ques
  • From: srp
• Paper: Photons and electrons as emergent phenomena
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• e = mc^2 ques
  • From: bob
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: RP
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: srp
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Santa Claus at Nearly the Speed of Light
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 23 Dec 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Justin Ape
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 8: Almeida of U. do Minho Portugal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 7: m = f(x, v, etc.)
  • From: OsherD
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Maxwell Equations - need some help
  • From: moatesim
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Elgnis
• Merry Christmas
  • From: The_Red_Telephone
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great
  • From: dedanoe
• My broken will reveals the codes of my own Zion
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Merry Newtonmas
  • From: Michael E.Marotta
• Re: Photons got me arrested!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: TO ALL IN AUSTRALIA NOW
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: 9-11 "Coincidences"
  • From: PD
• New version of the free Blender open source graphics creation program can do surface fluid simultion.
  • From: King Kong
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: RP
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Review of the year
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 6: Variable Exponents Explain Dimensional Homogeneity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great
  • From: Mark Martin
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 6: Variable Exponents Explain Dimensional Homogeneity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great
  • From: donstockbauer
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 5: Why Mass Dimension Has Exponent 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Airplanes with flat plate wings
  • From: bm459
• Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Dave Typinski
• curses and faqy
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• dedanoe is distant relative to Alexander The Macedonian also know as The Great
  • From: dedanoe
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: 9-11 "Coincidences"
  • From: Hank
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: God likes justice
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: srp
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: mmeron
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: hanson
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: hanson
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Maldona8
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE --- Number 759 December 22, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: God likes justice
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: God likes justice
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Computer Simulations of Spacetime
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: PD
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: hanson
• Re: Smallest time quantum delta t?
  • From: tycho bracket
• Computer Simulations of Spacetime
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: 9-11 "Coincidences"
  • From: PD
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: PD
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: hanson
• Re: The IMF is a Thieving_Junky, abusing oil and Iraqis.
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: 1Z
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Y.Porat
• Wikipedia: Feynman's Lost Lecture
  • From: Danil
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: PD
• Re: Process and Measurement Noise
  • From: Sam Wormley
• God likes justice
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Egap
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: PD
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: heepa9
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: heepa9
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: nano
  • From: donstockbauer
• nano
  • From: desperado
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Feedback in the Universe's Propositions 4: Self-Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: half-life of stable isotopes
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: kumar
• Process and Measurement Noise
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: markwh04
• Re: liquefaction chart.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: half-life of stable isotopes
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Cosmic Landscape
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Traveler
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: Richard Miller
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Smallest time quantum delta t?
  • From: tycho bracket
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: heepa9
• Re: curses
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: Bob
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: Bob
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: Bob
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: PD
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: srp
• Re: Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: whattodo
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is positive charge positive?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is positive charge positive?
  • From: PD
• Re: "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why is positive charge positive?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Why is positive charge positive?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: time-varying dynamic system
  • From: robert . w . adams
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: sobering@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: God creates justice
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: PD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: PD
• God creates justice
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Egap
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: PD
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: PD
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: PD
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Rebecca Hastings
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Rebecca Hastings
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Linønut
• Merry X-mas and a Prosperous New year in advance
  • From: Subzero1
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Rebecca Hastings
• "Call for Papers" - NanoTrends Journal
  • From: Nano
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: dkjk
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• liquefaction chart.
  • From: ngdbud
• Crystals vs. Molecules- Energy Difference?
  • From: kumar
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: hanson
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: half-life of stable isotopes
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: half-life of stable isotopes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• half-life of stable isotopes
  • From: Keith A. Schneider
• Gaussian charge distribution
  • From: dkjk
• Re: Pitting and surface damage in x-ray anodes
  • From: Cherry
• Re: Lenny Susskind's important new book "Cosmic Landscape"
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term.
  • From: kdthrge
• Ferromagnets and superconductors make negative-index materials
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pitting and surface damage in x-ray anodes
  • From: trojanblue
• Re: 9-11 "Coincidences"
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: Karl Forsberg
• Re: 9-11 "Coincidences"
  • From: Hank
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Denoco Inc.
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: srp
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: srp
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Maldona8
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: PD
• Re: spr post about connection by kst
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Androcles
• Proper Frequency
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 3: Internal vs External Knowledge
  • From: donstockbauer
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 3: Internal vs External Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: DenocoInc
• Re: curses are good
  • From: PD
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Traveler
• Re: curses
  • From: PD
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Transparency?
  • From: PD
• Re: curses are good
  • From: T Wake
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Egap
• good
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• faqy is cursed
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• curses are good
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Please Help
  • From: PD
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Hans Lohninger
• Re: No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term.
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: tadchem
• No existence of greenhouse gases. No scientific basis for this term.
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Briefcase Nuke at the WTCs?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Terry
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Hear Cynthia Sue Larson Now -"Understanding Reality Shifts" On The Isle Of Light Internet Radio Show
  • From: cap22322
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Smallest time quantum delta t?
  • From: Ioannis
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions 2: Feedback Explains Acceleration of Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Replacing helium on earth
  • From: Richard Henry
• Replacing helium on earth
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Mike
• spr post about connection by kst
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: Mike
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Mike
• The SI second is more virtual than real.
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: mike3
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Transparency?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth ?
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Please Help
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Transparency?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Richard Miller
• Ho! Ho! Ho! Merry Christmas!
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: salt melt ice
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: shanshicn
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Please Help
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Please Help
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: kvark
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: kvark
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: kvark
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: PD
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidence for phonons
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Egap
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: hanson
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Evidence for phonons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Evidence for phonons
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Evidence for phonons
  • From: donstockbauer
• Energy Conversion To Mass
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: kvark
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: kvark
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 19, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: The Flying Dutchman
• Sound pressure, calculating thrust from pressure, theory
  • From: kvark
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: The Flying Dutchman
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: The Flying Dutchman
• Re: Transparency?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Feedback In The Universe's Propositions
  • From: OsherD
• Feedback In The Universe's Propositions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Transparency?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: The Flying Dutchman
• Transparency?
  • From: Brablo
• Re: The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• The Universe Can Assert Propositions Which Create Physical Laws
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: mike3
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravitational Radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Gravitational Radiation
  • From: mike3
• Re: Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics vs better places
  • From: John Baez
• Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: F. Art Ingatu
• Spy ware from Dirk Van de moortel
  • From: F. Art Ingatu
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Reconstruction of Mass/Radiation: Mass/Radiation as Knowledge
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Lightning kills 11 in church
  • From: hanson
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Greg Neill
• The Universe Should At Largest and Smallest Scales....
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Mike
• Re: logical glitsch
  • From: glbrad01
• DE NATURA VISIBILIUM ET INVISIBILIUM
  • From: R.Aparicio
• Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Androcles
• Philosophy behind my deterministic theory(I am no physics student)(Inspired by statements of Einstein and Laplace) - Comments,Insults,Suggestions welcome
  • From: rak
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Please Help
  • From: pierceb
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Lightning kills 11 in church
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Most efficient way to boil water?
  • From: x600y
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Maxwell's equations
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: Y.Porat
• What's better place than here? What's better time than now?
  • From: dedanoe
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Ytrap
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Maxwell's equations
  • From: Maldona8
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: New type of minimal surface based on a double helix
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 4: Critique of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: Earle Jones
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: Mike
• Re: finding acceleration when given certain variables...
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: salt melt ice
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Circumhorizon arc
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: salt melt ice
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: mmeron
• How does light travel through a vacuum?
  • From: chuckles
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: salt melt ice
  • From: John Popelish
• salt melt ice
  • From: vsgdp
• Circumhorizon arc
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: mmeron
• Cosmological Quantum Units and Planck's Units
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: On absolute units
  • From: Louis_N
• Re: finding acceleration when given certain variables...
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• finding acceleration when given certain variables...
  • From: lancelotti13
• Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 3: "Reborn Physics"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Classical mechanics as if QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Merry Newtonmas
  • From: Michael E.Marotta
• Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: jimp
• how atoms are arranged on a surface?
  • From: shanshicn
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: New type of minimal surface based on a double helix
  • From: whattodo
• Re: Hole in Earth
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 2: Electromagnetics Are Not Causal
  • From: OsherD
• Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation 2: Electromagnetics Are Not Causal
  • From: OsherD
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ytrap
• Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Lightning And Grounding Questions
  • From: Robert11
• Some Holes In Temperature, Density, Big Bang Infinity Premise
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Cyber world
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Cyber world
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: dedanoe's paradox
  • From: dedanoe
• Cyber world
  • From: pl . moyne
• tell me about group velocity
  • From: narasimha_murthy_h@xxxxxxxxxxx
• God and curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Complex Multiplication Does Not Preserve Causation
  • From: OsherD
• New type of minimal surface based on a double helix
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 16 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The location of invisible "dark matter" [has been mapped] in unprecedented detail
  • From: FrediFizzx
• The location of invisible "dark matter" [has been mapped] in unprecedented detail
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: what the freak is this super gravity shit?
  • From: donstockbauer
• what the freak is this super gravity shit?
  • From: Shanu
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: tj Frazir
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 16 Dec 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dedanoe's paradox
  • From: Mike
• dedanoe's paradox
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Electromagnetic Origin of Mass
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Ytrap
• Re: The *War* on Christmas! `~
  • From: tj Frazir
• Post to spr re "connections"
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Circulation?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Move Over, Atheists!
  • From: François Guillet
• On absolute units
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: Move Over, Atheists!
  • From: François Guillet
• Re: Circulation?
  • From: nimcha
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Ian Parker
• curses
  • From: kkurtstocklmeir
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of Sex vs Violent Hatred of Sex
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of Sex vs Violent Hatred of Sex
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of Sex vs Violent Hatred of Sex
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of Sex vs Violent Hatred of Sex
  • From: OsherD
• Physics of Terror Feedback: Worship of Sex vs Violent Hatred of Sex
  • From: OsherD
• Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation" 2: Probable Correlation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: believe in quantum pi
  • From: tadchem
• Relationships between the Bohr model and the fine structure constant.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: believe in quantum pi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Separation of Variables Causes Quantum "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: PD
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: Meker John
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: Meker John
• Re: believe in quantum pi
  • From: Meker John
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: believe in quantum pi
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: John Christiansen
• Feynman Lectures....Question re 2005 Revised Ed.
  • From: junjunius
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Geophysics EM
  • From: h . molhem
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: onehappymadman
• believe in quantum pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: Mike
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Quantum Pi
  • From: PD
• Quantum Pi
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: PD
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: Gary
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: buyanovsky
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Trats
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: briggs
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: briggs
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: briggs
• Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: 矿泉水
• Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: 矿泉水
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Happy Hippy
• loop quantum blueshit
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Push gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Ian Parker
• Push gravity
  • From: fishfry
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Empirical Utility of Dualism
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: jesper pedersen
• Re: Helium
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Helium
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Lapping light ontop of itself...how bright would it get?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: briggs
• Re: Circular orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Helium
  • From: briggs
• Circular orbit
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: Helium
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Helium
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Helium
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Helium
  • From: PD
• Re: Helium
  • From: PD
• Re: Helium
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: Helium
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: Mike
• Re: Helium
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Jim Black
• Helium
  • From: magicvsmagick
• Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: onehappymadman
• spam - Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Trats
• Re: Physics Today: Einstein's Mistakes
  • From: hanson
• Re: BYU Physics Professor vs Some Guy On Usenet
  • From: tj Frazir
• Electromagnetic Origin of Mass
  • From: gsardin
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: hanson
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: jesper pedersen
• The Speed of Light and A Dual Nature to Time
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: hanson
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: jesper pedersen
• Re: ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Circulation?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Ian Parker
• ideas and questions about the splash of a liquid drop on a solid surface
  • From: 矿泉水
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Circulation?
  • From: CWatters
• Art_5 : Relative Measurements in Local Reference Frames
  • From: GSS
• Circulation?
  • From: nimcha
• Re: Hitchhiker's Energy Guide To Wikipedia and Elsewhere
  • From: OsherD
• Hitchhiker's Energy Guide To Wikipedia and Elsewhere
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Avi Goldberg
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Sue...
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: hanson
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Most precise single redshift bound to the variability of the fine-structure constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Revisiting Variable Constants
  • From: Sam Wormley
• potential to make the latest Pentium chip look as outmoded as the abacus
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Most precise single redshift bound to the variability of the fine-structure constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Revisiting Variable Constants
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Lapping light ontop of itself...how bright would it get?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Dean J Garrett
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Jim Black
• Lapping light ontop of itself...how bright would it get?
  • From: twm
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: Keith Partridge
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3.1: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review
  • From: OsherD
• The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3.1: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: briggs
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Real skydivers do not give up. (if chute fails)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Dean J Garrett
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: PD
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How you can tell if you're off track...
  • From: Orion
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: PD
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Bottom Line, Seto, does your IRT...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Art_4 : Validity of Assumptions and Postulates
  • From: GSS
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: PD
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Ontario salary guide for researc scientists in physics
  • From: Orion
• Re: Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Ontario salary guide for researc scientists in physics
  • From: guzzeva
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Radiation Detection Question
  • From: Matt
• Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science
  • From: lansing9992004
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hole in Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Hole in Earth
  • From: operator jay
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Source for Einstein's Papers
  • From: Harry
• Hole in Earth
  • From: Grammar
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Terrestrial mass (w/g) vs celestial mass (f/g)
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: Y.Porat
• The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 3: A Danish-German Simultaneous Review and Un-Review
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago
  • From: CWatters
• Is Time a Vector? if not what it is then?
  • From: venuprasanna
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Riddles of QM solved at last ?
  • From: Avi Goldberg
• How can I build a quantum switch?
  • From: Anonymous
• Smart1234's Anti-Gravity Device (AGD) Analysis Done Years Ago
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 2: An "Un-Review" Paper in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front 2: An "Un-Review" Paper in arXiv
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
  • From: OsherD
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: RP
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: muknot
• Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
  • From: OsherD
• The Missing "Review Energy" Keyword Papers in arXiv/Front
  • From: OsherD
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• starting context
  • From: olo
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: platopes
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Speaking of Faith
  • From: richard miller
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: richard miller
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Orion
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• The Properties of the Aether
  • From: Trats
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Mike
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Mike
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: PD
• Computer Models of the Universe and Special Relativity
  • From: MobyDikc
• Physics FAQ: Can You See the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics FAQ: Is Faster Than Light Travel or Communication Possible?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: motion of magnet
  • From: hobart Zklfed
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Orion
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: motion of magnet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• motion of magnet
  • From: klawesyn28
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: 9/11 Update: Listen to the WTC floor collapses
  • From: Harry
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Art_3 : Inertial Reference Frames and the ICRS
  • From: GSS
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Source for Einstein's Papers
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: Al Zenner
• Re: PUSHPAK VIMAAN
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why Are Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, etc. Exceptions?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A Thread For All Seasons
  • From: donstockbauer
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 12, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: FrediFizzx
• A Thread For All Seasons
  • From: OsherD
• Why Are Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, etc. Exceptions?
  • From: OsherD
• Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared 3: France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: RP
• Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared 2: Islamist Nations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?
  • From: jonah . singularity
• Re: Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: hobart Zklfed
• Astronomers map dark matter in startling detail
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Speaking of Faith
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sci.physics.research vs sci.physics (my theads) Compared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: xm radio vs. direct tv
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: Mkajuma
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Very basic: what is velocity?
  • From: wazoo
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?
  • From: Sue...
• when a mad man's got a point to make
  • From: dedanoe
• Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Quantum computing speed limits
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: AJW
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: tj Frazir
• xm radio vs. direct tv
  • From: Mkajuma
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Revolution
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Request for help
  • From: ms
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: operator jay
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Conservation of momentum?
  • From: whattodo
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Y.Porat
• canonical science today: New physics from biology?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Art_2 : Inertial Property of All Forms of Energy
  • From: GSS
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Orion
• taken from http://dedanoe.tripod.com/nukebook/pmpm.html
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes
  • From: glbrad01
• Source for Einstein's Papers
  • From: David Findlay
• Re: 9/11: The Truth Revealed about Eagle Eye's compulsive lying.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Art_1 : Fundamental Research in Physics
  • From: GSS
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: -Chris-
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: RP
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: hanson
• Re: For Seto
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: Chris L.
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: Chris L.
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: magnetism question
  • From: Chris L.
• For Seto
  • From: Sam Wormley
• magnetism question
  • From: muknot
• Astrophysical evidence for the existence of black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: particle collisions
  • From: Tzazak
• The Holy Trinity (of science)
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Room of light large enough to produce darkness in the center?
  • From: twmonahan
• Re: Article: On Using Chaos to Transmit Information
  • From: glbrad01
• Conservation of momentum?
  • From: Dean J Garrett
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: New laws of motion?
  • From: Orion
• Article: On Using Chaos to Transmit Information
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• New laws of motion?
  • From: joe_avery_2005
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• quote dedanoe's quotes
  • From: dedanoe
• Just kidding
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Teaching ID as religion is a dangerous affair
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: Orion
• Relativity, Evolution, and Intelligent Design
  • From: glbrad01
• Ecuadorean woman proves Relativity!!!!
  • From: tdp1001
• Is It An Absolute That Andromeda Is Going To Collide With The Milky Way?
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "How I wasted my life engaging in useless Usenet argle-bargles"
  • From: dedanoe
• don't ya
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: particle collisions
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble
  • From: donstockbauer
• "How I wasted my life engaging in useless Usenet argle-bargles"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party
  • From: hanson
• Re: particle collisions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party
  • From: donstockbauer
• tj Frazir's "Manhatten Xmass" party
  • From: hanson
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Y.Porat
• What's the best strategy for finding a good parking spot quickly?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant
  • From: Jack// ani
• More Often Than Not, Massive Galaxies Form by Mergers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday new year sci phy party
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Q: energy consumption
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein in 2010
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: particle collisions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• particle collisions
  • From: Tzazak
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Collision between two particles (quadratic formula, is the + or - solution correct?)
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Magic Numbers
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$
  • From: hanson
• Manhatten NYNY Holiday dock Xmass in NY eta waypoint
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: New Green EXTORTION -- Enviros demand your $$$
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: BEER BEER BEER
  • From: tj Frazir
• A simple method to create robust DNA "pyramids" that self-assemble
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Dec 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What to do with Employee Stock Purchase Plan
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Refractive index and dielectric constant
  • From: tadchem
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Refractive index and dielectric constant
  • From: Jack// ani
• Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Brablo
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Drac
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 13: All Energy is Expansive, All Mass is Contractive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: deuterium separation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: PD
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: PD
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 13: All Energy is Expansive, All Mass is Contractive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: PD
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: tadchem
• deuterium separation
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: in need of a science gift idea
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today
  • From: gubernacullum
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today
  • From: gubernacullum
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: David Macmanus
• nobel ceremony to be broadcast live on the net today
  • From: gubernacullum
• Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS
  • From: Wally Anglesea™
• Special Relativity as applied to "Black Holes"? <speculation>
  • From: Eric Flesch
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: Eric Flesch
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 12: An Artificial Planet
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback
  • From: donstockbauer
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 12: An Artificial Planet
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: TERRIBLE XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS
  • From: donstockbauer
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 11: "Unto Thyself Be True" As Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp
  • From: OsherD
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 10: A Hitchhiker's Space Warp
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Perseus arm is closer than thought
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: OsherD
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 9: Dark Energy is Knowledge/Semantic Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum computing speed limits
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Quantum computing speed limits
  • From: david petry
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The measure of mass is inertia
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: AJW
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: warren . sensei
• Re: in need of a science gift idea
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• in need of a science gift idea
  • From: tseverson@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: DedaNoe's got the POWER!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: PD
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: T Wake
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: jimp
• Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: DedaNoe's got the POWER!!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Capillary Rise
  • From: PD
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: PD
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: PD
• hypothetical air circulation
  • From: sarahsbs
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: jaska
• Re: Equations to compute scissor jack
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: PD
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The measure of mass is inertia
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: jimp
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Doog
• Re: Capillary Rise
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Charles
• Magic Numbers
  • From: Gary
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Charles
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: hanson
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Charles
• DedaNoe's got the POWER!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology
  • From: OsherD
• I am confused!
  • From: ra
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: OsherD
• I am confused!
  • From: ra
• I am confused!
  • From: ra
• Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: OsherD
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 8: Knowledge Equation Analysis of Geology
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light
  • From: Mike
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• frequency of pendulum cone
  • From: tarjanrobert1234
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Two teams of physicists have stored a single photon of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 7: Gondwanaland and Laurasia
  • From: OsherD
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 7: Gondwanaland and Laurasia
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Wormhole/Black Hole Feedback Detection By Geography and History
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: AJW
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: AJW
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: PD
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Capillary Rise
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: Charles
• Re: Capillary Rise
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Capillary Rise
  • From: deplifer
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: AJW
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: PD
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: PD
• Re: Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Double Your Momentum, Reflection
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: AJW
• Re: Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Brablo
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Equations to compute scissor jack
  • From: Nguyen
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Equations to compute scissor jack
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Equations to compute scissor jack
  • From: Nguyen
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: aktovka
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Brablo
• Re: Wind Directions?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Wind Directions?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Building homes deep underground...
  • From: Brablo
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: mmeron
• Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
  • From: Brablo
• Re: HAPPY XMAS SEASON TO YOU ALL BASTARDS
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Josef Matz
• pattern of electrons 4 Sam
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: PD
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 757 December 7, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Ratio Mu/Ru
  • From: wgilmour
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: SBC Yahoo
• Re: BEER BEER BEER
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: jaska
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: PD
• Re: Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted
  • From: Sue meht
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: PD
• Re: Electrostatic gas mixing?
  • From: PD
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: PD
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: Josef Matz
• H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Diff. in Theoretical Capacitance value and Coventor value?
  • From: deplifer
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Doog
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• The Inconsistency Of Big Bang Frozen Frame Picture
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 6: It All Started in Japan & Then U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Radiometer Pressure
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Electrostatic gas mixing?
  • From: gpratt
• Radiometer Pressure
  • From: Bret Cahill
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?
  • From: LEFTY
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 5: Chinese Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: TomGee
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: TomGee
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: SOiL
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: ?
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: PD
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers
  • From: Charles
• Re: Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: T Wake
• Visible Matter is Dark Matter Waste!
  • From: TomGee
• Re: String theory?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: The Upcoming Age Of Levers
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 4: Chaplygin Dark Energy-Matter Unification
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: hanson
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: String theory?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: jaska
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: String theory?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: String theory?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Universal form: An expanding hypersphere
  • From: ?
• Re: String theory?
  • From: ?
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: ?
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Doog
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• The Upcoming Age Of Levers
  • From: dedanoe
• Dimesional waves and Space time alignment(An idea)
  • From: satish
• Micro White Holes
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: echo paradox
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Education tools
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Education tools
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Will WWIII start March 2006?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Education tools
  • From: liska273
• echo paradox
  • From: ante
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: TomGee
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 3: The Boys From Bogolyubov
  • From: OsherD
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Einstein was dumb. ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: CWatters
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: LurfysMa
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: LurfysMa
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: PD
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: PD
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Mark Martin
• LaLa Land with the QM Bots
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Why The Universe Has Feedback 2: Tasker and Bryan 1 Dec 2005
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: PD
• Re: New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: String theory?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: String theory?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: Mike
• Re: New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: richard miller
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Mike
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Mike
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Mike
• New concept about expantion of the univers
  • From: anani
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Silicon Stress-Strain Curve ?
  • From: deplifer
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: PD
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why The Universe Has Feedback
  • From: hanson
• Re: Prove for Newton's mechanics
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Why The Universe Has Feedback
  • From: OsherD
• Did early universe expand faster than light?
  • From: LurfysMa
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Doog
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Harry
• Re: 28 physics videos - hewitts conceptual physics
  • From: PT
• Re: THE TERRIBLE PREDICAMENT OF THE FRAUDULOUS GEOLOGY
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 05, 2005
  • From: donstockbauer
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, December 05, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• 28 physics videos - hewitts conceptual physics
  • From: PT
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Wormholes Without Exotic Matter
  • From: OsherD
• Feedback ByTwo-Phase One-Directional Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If Sir Isaac Newton Had Lived in India instead of the U.K....
  • From: OsherD
• If Sir Isaac Newton Had Lived in India instead of the U.K....
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• discrete physics as a neural network
  • From: andybmt
• Re: Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5
  • From: OsherD
• Physics of 10^x Years, x = 1 to 5
  • From: OsherD
• Re: G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: String theory?
  • From: ?
• Re: What about compressed air cylinders to store renewable energy ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: JD
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• G(o) R(oberts)
  • From: Mike
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Metallicity of stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Metallicity of stars
  • From: Conor
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 4: Central Core Radius vs Universe Radius
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Math/Physics Software
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Math/Physics Software
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: X48
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Intelligent Design wake the dumbass
  • From: T Wake
• Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND!! ==> NIST: No Fire In WTC 1 Core
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: God#
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: God#
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: does surface system observe the 3rd law?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma
  • From: Jean-Paul Turcaud
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 3: An Alternation of Radiation and Matter Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 3: An Alternation of Radiation and Matter Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• **theory-edge** mailing list
  • From: vznuri
• Re: God#
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• does surface system observe the 3rd law?
  • From: vector
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: F-u(w?/g)=fg; or why I use f=gm, instead of F=ma*g
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein WAS smart
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: F-uw=f; or why I use f=(m)a, instead of F=ma
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: F-u(w?/g)=fg; or why I use f=gm, instead of F=ma*g
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: God#
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: Intelligent Design wake the dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Quick question about air pressure
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Quick question about air pressure
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!
  • From: john_ramsden
• Math/Physics Software
  • From: Chris Scott
• Re: Errors in the "The Big Bang Never Happened"
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: THE FRAUD OF TRUE GEOLOGY AND THE LONE BELIEVER
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Quick question about air pressure
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Prove for Newton's mechanics
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Quick question about air pressure
  • From: ngdbud
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Question about multiple colisions in HS (hard sphere) model
  • From: altamente
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite" Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: We Know
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: God#
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Mike
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Mike
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"
  • From: OsherD
• Errors in the "The Big Bang Never Happened"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: Brad Guth
• Quantum physics study - Where to begin?
  • From: nasaiya
• Re: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: jaska
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Jagdish Chandra Bose should have jointly received the 1909 Nobel Prize for the discovery of wireless telegraphy
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Mike
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: X48
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: jumping on a trampoline with spring arcs on your feet
  • From: ik
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: More about relativistic computing
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Hero . van . Jindelt
• Re: December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Network Inoculation: Antivirus shield would outrace cyber infection
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Carsten Troelsgaard
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: What Did Eddington Prove in 1919?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Any connection between Gravity and Electro Magnetism?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Separating a Twoonie with Liquid Nitrogen?
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: hanson
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What Did Eddington Prove in 1919?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet
  • From: tj Frazir
• Latest PhysicsWeb Summaries
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FASCISM , was Re: On basic formalism of SR - 2
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"? nothing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: F-uw=f
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Phil Holman
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Separating a Twoonie with Liquid Nitrogen?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: hhc314
• More about relativistic computing
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• rotational kinetic energy question?
  • From: dmathd
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Analogous Superconductivity & Analogous Bose-Einstein Condensate for Fermionic Matter
  • From: Kwok Man Hui
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Separating a Twoonie with Liquid Nitrogen?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 2 Dec 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Separating a Twoonie with Liquid Nitrogen?
  • From: Paul Ciszek
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• spam - Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• simulating plate tectonic action!
  • From: seanvbd
• Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sheldon Harper
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: X48
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• December 2005 Scientific American article
  • From: David Thomson
• Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question about diffraction/slits
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: PD
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Y.Porat
• Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all
  • From: glbrad01
• Re: Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: CWatters
• Bell's Inequality experiment with 3 entangled photons?
  • From: Wai Yu Wong
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: IsaacKuo
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Schoenfeld
• What is right about QM?
  • From: ?
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: ?
• Re: Roboto est mort
  • From: Tice with a J
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Entangling the largest number of particles ever
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: HERE IS HOW GRAVITY WORKS
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Maxwell equations and plane waves
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: PD
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Entangling the largest number of particles ever
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: OG
• Re: HERE IS HOW GRAVITY WORKS
  • From: dedanoe
• What a MISS, SIR Isaac Newton SIR!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: E = kL^a Part 3: Taub-NUT Applications
  • From: OsherD
• Re: E = kL^a Part 3: Taub-NUT Applications
  • From: OsherD
• E = kL^a Part 3: Taub-NUT Applications
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: String theory?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Old Man
• Re: old papers
  • From: richard miller
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: PD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: galsaba
• Re: String theory?
  • From: PD
• Re: String theory?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: PD
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: galsaba
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: PD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: PD
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: PD
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: Traveler
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: galsaba
• Re: What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: PD
• What are the units to measure belt tension
  • From: galsaba
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• E = kL^a 2: Taub-Nut, Misner, and Godel Universes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Dark Matter May not Exist
  • From: Kwok Man Hui
• Re: E = kL^a
  • From: OsherD
• E = kL^a
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Carsten Troelsgaard
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: X84
• Re: Why string theorists like Brian Greene are Crackpots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: PD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question about diffraction/slits
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Peter
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Carsten Troelsgaard
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Absorbtion and emissions
  • From: Carsten Troelsgaard
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: Androcles
• Reading: Good idea or bad idea?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a Physicist had written the Bible....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Mathlete
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Question about diffraction/slits
  • From: PD
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: If a Physicist had written the Bible....
  • From: jimp
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: PD
• If a Physicist had written the Bible....
  • From: JD
• Re: Question about diffraction/slits
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Question about diffraction/slits
  • From: chris
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Keith F. Lynch
• Re: Why Can't I Observe the Visual Spectrum with a Radio?
  • From: Keith F. Lynch
• Re: Curved N - Dimensional Manifolds
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: A little reminder abot anold troll
  • From: Bob Cain
• Modern Microscopy 1903 vintage FA
  • From: JaneyP
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Falling ball, deviation due to earth rotation
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Toroids
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: jumping on a trampoline with spring arcs on your feet
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Quantum theory: A resonance effect?
  • From: slehar
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• jumping on a trampoline with spring arcs on your feet
  • From: ik
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mechdan
• Re: Toroids
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Toroids
  • From: g
• Re: Singularities are ALL naked
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: What's a good "proton reflector"?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: R.Feymann & the String Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 756 November 30, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• R.Feymann & the String Theory
  • From: Thierry Mella
• Re: old papers
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Peter
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Acquiring papers
  • From: tadchem
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: X84
• Re: old papers
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Origin of forces
  • From: Peter
• Re: Desktop Railgun
  • From: Jan Panteltje