Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all


glbrad01 wrote:
> Looking at your fumbles site I see that you have never made a mistake in
> your life. Not a one. Nor have you ever in your life had the slightest bit
> of imagination, vision, or questioned any theory with a different deduction
> from the given deduction once a deduction has hit the big time. Einstein
> himself once told Heisenberg not to hold him to anything he said before he
> knew better. Hawking has publicly admitted to some big mistakes he made in
> his earlier times. Von Neumann and Lord Kelvin made singular mistakes so
> great they are continually part of our humorous literature of [greats of
> various fields'] truly immortal fumbles. Such are big time, titanic,
> [professional] fumbles.
>
> This is an open forum for the worst amateurs as well as gifted amateurs.
> It is an open forum for the worst professionals as well as gifted
> professionals. It is an open forum for trial and error, trial and error,
> trial and error. It is a forum for describing some "really weird universes"
> and string theory, for just one example, predicts countless possibilities of
> "really weird universes." Our own universe, according to some of the most
> thoughtful greats, is subject in many ways to also being "really weird." A
> quote by physicist Marc Davis at one of the first conferences on string
> theory has been echoed countless times since by the best and most thoughtful
> professionals, "We know next to nothing about the Universe." Hawking stated
> that the least supposed knowledgeable, the most ignorant among humankind,
> could have the one right picture of the way things really are. That that is
> how really little we really know.
>
> So per all these notables, you've wasted so much -- so very valuable --
> space and time over the years. At least we amateurs are in great company in
> our fumbles. But you've made the most "immortal fumble" of them all. No
> imagination -- only too obvious. No vision -- only too obvious. No trials --
> only too obvious. No errors -- only too obvious. No "fumbles," immortal or
> otherwise. Thus a waste. Pure waste. You have peers in it but no superior in
> it who-so-ever. As I said, always "the most 'immortal fumble' of them all."
>
> I make many mistakes. You've made only one. What a terrible waste.

.

Relevant Pages