Re: Dirk Van de moortel and the most immortal fumble of them all


I'm pleased to note that you are talking about the idiot and not TO the
merde.
Androcles.


<tdp1001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133580949.479285.136810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> glbrad01 wrote:
>> Looking at your fumbles site I see that you have never made a mistake in
>> your life. Not a one. Nor have you ever in your life had the slightest
>> bit
>> of imagination, vision, or questioned any theory with a different
>> deduction
>> from the given deduction once a deduction has hit the big time. Einstein
>> himself once told Heisenberg not to hold him to anything he said before
>> he
>> knew better. Hawking has publicly admitted to some big mistakes he made
>> in
>> his earlier times. Von Neumann and Lord Kelvin made singular mistakes so
>> great they are continually part of our humorous literature of [greats of
>> various fields'] truly immortal fumbles. Such are big time, titanic,
>> [professional] fumbles.
>>
>> This is an open forum for the worst amateurs as well as gifted
>> amateurs.
>> It is an open forum for the worst professionals as well as gifted
>> professionals. It is an open forum for trial and error, trial and error,
>> trial and error. It is a forum for describing some "really weird
>> universes"
>> and string theory, for just one example, predicts countless possibilities
>> of
>> "really weird universes." Our own universe, according to some of the most
>> thoughtful greats, is subject in many ways to also being "really weird."
>> A
>> quote by physicist Marc Davis at one of the first conferences on string
>> theory has been echoed countless times since by the best and most
>> thoughtful
>> professionals, "We know next to nothing about the Universe." Hawking
>> stated
>> that the least supposed knowledgeable, the most ignorant among humankind,
>> could have the one right picture of the way things really are. That that
>> is
>> how really little we really know.
>>
>> So per all these notables, you've wasted so much -- so very valuable --
>> space and time over the years. At least we amateurs are in great company
>> in
>> our fumbles. But you've made the most "immortal fumble" of them all. No
>> imagination -- only too obvious. No vision -- only too obvious. No
>> trials --
>> only too obvious. No errors -- only too obvious. No "fumbles," immortal
>> or
>> otherwise. Thus a waste. Pure waste. You have peers in it but no superior
>> in
>> it who-so-ever. As I said, always "the most 'immortal fumble' of them
>> all."
>>
>> I make many mistakes. You've made only one. What a terrible waste.
>
> The poster makes a good point when he points out
> that Moortel's life is ONE big "fumble".
>
> As I pointed out in an old post,
> which follows below,
> the purpose of Mortell's web site is
> to compensate for an inferiority complex,
> and to attack folks who have
> exposed his ignorance in the newsgroups.
>
> Old post follows.
> ==============
> Your web site tells far more about you,
> than it does about the folks,
> whose articles are featured on your web site.
>
> It tells that you have an inferiority complex
> and try to stroke your ego
> by trying to slander other folks.
>
> And it shows that you target certain folks,
> ( Probably because they have exposed your "fumbles"
> in an open forum, rather than in a personal web page.)
> and imply that particular posts,
> which may or not be informative and valid,
> are "Fumbles" by virtue of the fact
> that they are referenced on your site.
>
> For example, I see that you reference two of my posts
> which make reference to my position,
> that it makes more sense to get information
> from "The horse's mouth, rather from a horse's ass."
>
> Of course, it may be that you actually believe that a "horse's ass"
> is the best source of information,
> and that you are striving to be the best source.
>
> And it shows that you are cowardly,
> and need the security of people
> with psychological problems similar to yours.
>
> Perhaps you will prove me wrong by
> posting a few references to some of the so-called "fumbles"
> made by the other posters in sci.physics,
> who, like you, habitually stroke their egos
> by attacking other folks.
>
> I will be anxiously looking forward to seeing
> your references to some of these "fumbles".
> ==============
> End of old post.
>
> Case in point.
> Wormley and Old Man recently attacked me
> for pointing out that the Fine Structure Constant
> was affected by mass, and no apology or response
> was forthcoming when I posted NIST verification of this.
>
> You can bet you won't see these REAL "fumbles"
> on Mortell's web site, as Moortel does not
> post the REAL "fumbles" of the sci.physics Taliban,
> as this would undermine his rationalization for attacking
> messengers, rather than addressing messages
> in an open, honest, rational, intelligent, mature, moral way.
>
> --
> Tom Potter
> http://no-turtles.com
> http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
> http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
>


.