Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"



>>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are both "infinite" and "finite"
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
First Published 2005

There are two indications that radiation creates matter and that c, G
are both "infinite" and "finite". These are: (a) Probability proper
coordinates in singularities, and (b) infinite exponents in c, G
scenarios.

Let's start with the most well known singularity, a black hole. At
the risk of shattering some myths about black holes based on Hawking's
obsession with thermodynamics which relates to syntactic rather than
semantic information and other considerations, let's follow a light ray
through a black hole in dual probability coordinates, namely PI
(Probable Influence) P(A-->B) = 1 + y - x and conditional probability
P(B|A) = y/x. Here x is the influencing or causing variable, y is the
influenced or caused variable on scales of 0 to 1, and as we approach
the hole we'll have x --> 0 which constrains y --> 0 from P(A-->B)
(since probability never exceeds 1) but "blows up" P(B|A).

In P(A-->B) coordinates, nothing happens! Or more precisely, physics
isn't violated, but P(A-->B) --> 1 which means that maximum possible
probable causation is being exerted. This is what we would expect in
creating matter from radiation or from anything.

In P(B|A) coordinates, chaos ensues. You can try to find a limit for
y/x as x --> 0+ in the respective special cases x = y, x = 2y, x = 3y,
etc., and you'll come up with 1, 1/2, 1/3, etc. - that is, no single
limit and therefore no limit, whether one-sided or two-sided. A more
general argument can also be made.

We have in a sense penetrated chaos in both non-chaotic and chaotic
coordinates, and since we interpret matter creation from radiation in
the first case, how do we interpret chaos itself in the second case?
Phase change, but not only that - an "incommunicado" phase change
corresponding to total disorientation of the "observer". Curiously
enough, we'd expect the phase to change in creating matter from
radiation or anything comparable in "seriousness".

Readers can try variable exponents c^a and G^a in the usual physical
laws and include a = infinity as one case and then see what happens as
homework.

Osher Doctorow

.



Relevant Pages

  • Black Hole Probability-Logic 2: Radiation vs Matter Difference Arises
    ... >>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxxxx ... One of the first things that the Universe "notices" is that radiation ... but matter at least in the form that we know it cannot. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Do you believe in black holes?
    ... hole to provide it with its mass. ... You said "'Black body radiation' ... Let's forget the "black body" stuff. ... absence of ponderable matter. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Do you believe in black holes?
    ... And how is it any different if the mass is located in the "Coal ... You said "'Black body radiation' ... was responsible for curvature. ... absence of ponderable matter. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: The phrase dark matter
    ... it or even define it is clearly a misnomer no matter how hard you wish ... Then why ask for the evidence if you already knew what it was? ... synchrotron radiation). ... blackbodies do not radiate either, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The phrase dark matter
    ... it or even define it is clearly a misnomer no matter how hard you wish ... What's the evidence that we can see through it? ... synchrotron radiation). ... blackbodies do not radiate either, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)