Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:49:46 GMT
Schoenfeld wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
Schoenfeld wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
Schoenfeld wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-12/p34.html
Einstein's philosophical habit of mind, cultivated by undergraduate training and lifelong dialogue, had a profound effect on the way he did physics.
See: http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-12/p34.html
I suppose it's easy to criticize in retrospect, but Einstein was a smart fellow who carried many prejudices with him about how nature should work. Prejudices which, in my opinion, made him fall short of the super-hero status the (funding seeking) physics community make him out to be.
Had he left the field equations of gravitation the way they he derived them he could've predicted the expansion of the universe decades before it was observed. Instead he inserted a cosmological constant because he wanted the universe to be static.
Had he tried to find actual solutions to his differential field equations he could've predicted strange astronomical bodies. The simple geometry of a circle would've predicted the existence of blackholes, and other important (inferred) properties of nature.
Had Einstein not been prejudiced by notions of determinism (which he himself helped destroy) he could've played a major role in the development of quantum theory and not have been relegated as an old fuddy duddy in his later years of isolation..
Funny... how Einstein made so many of those contributions you think he didn't!
You must be confused. I never said Einstein made those contributions, I said he could've.
You must be confused. Einstein made so many of those contributions you think he didn't!
#1: The expansion of the universe was first proposed by Hubble (that's Edwin Hubble, not the telescope).
Einstein's GTR predicts a dynamic universe (with or without a cosmological constant).
#2: Blackholes were predicted by Karl Schwarzchild a year after Einstein published his field equations. Einstein was surprised by Schwarzchild's quick result as he believed his PDE's were too complicated to solve meaningfully.
Einstein's GTR predicts black holes.
#3: Einstein did not play a major role in the development of quantum theory. QT is a lot more than particles of light (which was proposed by Newton centuries before).
Einstein played a very major role in the development of quantum mechanics starting with his 1905 paper on the photoelectric effect and culminating with his EPR paper and follow-ons.
The point you missed was that Einstein *could've* achieved these things. He still did achieve major breakthroughs, that's not what I'm debating - I'm saying is that he was just off from being the super-hero they paint him out to be.
I didn't miss the point at all... yeah, he could have done more, but he chose to spend his time trying to unify electromagnetism and gravity. Yet he achieved so much in several fields.
Most physicists would be happy to make one discovery that is important enough to be taught to future generations of physics students. Only a very small number manage this in their lifetime, and even fewer make two appearances in the textbooks.
But Einstein was different. In little more than eight months in 1905 he completed five papers that would change the world for ever. Spanning three quite distinct topics - relativity, the photoelectric effect and Brownian motion - Einstein overturned our view of space and time, showed that it is insufficient to describe light purely as a wave, and laid the foundations for the discovery of atoms.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Mike
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Schoenfeld
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- References:
- Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Schoenfeld
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Schoenfeld
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- From: Schoenfeld
- Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- Prev by Date: Radiation Creates Matter, and c, G are Both "infinite" and "finite"
- Next by Date: Re: New theory vs. Big Bang
- Previous by thread: Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- Next by thread: Re: Albert Einstein as a Philosopher of Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|