Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet

tj Frazir (aka sci.physics only),
>Titanium iron oxide is royal blue.
>nasa missed the argon all together.
In addition to all of the titaniun, carbon/soot and iorn deposits, it
seems they also entirely missed the horrific amounts of sodium, of
their being so much sodium that it still boils off by day to such an
extent of creating and sustaining the 14,000 km atmosphere that's
having been well proven to exist, enough sodium being extracted that a
900,000 km comet like trail as blown by solar winds is yet another
hard-science matter of fact.

There's so much salt that it leaves little doubt that our moon was once
upon a time a much larger sphere of an icy proto-moon, which should
also account for why all of those truly massive craters were
established as being so gosh darn shallow, as though there was perhaps
originally 262 km worth of salty ice protecting the surface.

I tend to agree totally, that our NASA has been exactly the sort phony
baloney and perpetrated cold-war cloak on behalf of MI6/NSA~CIA daggers
that they were back then, and obviously still are having to keep this
to themselves, or else those men-in-black start showing up. Our NASA ia
the "money laundering service" as well as a primary disinformation
resource of having created and promoted a vast arrays of spendy
BBC/NOVA infomercials, thereby having snookered the majority of
humanity, many having been dumbfounded to their ultimate demise.

You've known for decades and I have only recently known of far too many
reasons as to why our NASA/Apollo folks never walked upon our moon.
It's possible that we had managed to briefly orbit the moon in person,
whereas I'm talking about a once around that nasty sucker and then get
the hell out of that TBI dosage situation ASAP, but I also no longer
believe we've managed a robotic deploymant upon our moon, other than
for having creating a few artificial craters upon such efforts
impacting and/or sinking out of sight like all of the superior robotic
USSR efforts managed.

I'm thinking that at best our NASA/Apollo crew spent the entire time
coasting within a somewhat LL1/ME-L1 station-keeping mode as offered by
the mutual gravity-well that's somewhat of an interactive zone that's
roughly 60,000 km off the deck and remains directly aligned with Earth,
sending their supposed fly-by-rocket lander in for accomplishing those
multiple orbits as unmanned, obviously having deployed itself via
remote command as for their attempting at getting this equipment onto
the surface where each of those efforts essentially impacted because we
had not devised a safe fly-by-rocket lander that could have safely
managed the task, much less protected the crew from the absolutely
horrific levels of secondary/recoil hard-X-ray dosage, nor even
offering sufficient physical protection. There's also the little matter
of their "CHAPRL BELL" signal transponder that shouldn't have been
necessary if we were actually walking upon the surface. There's also
their very own unfiltered Kodak moments that simply have not
represented the raw surface, nor as having to survive the terrably
reactive nature of our extremely albedo dark and nasty moon that
actually has a fairly complex atmosphere of sodium, argon, CO2 and deck
layer Radon that's still at best offering next to nothing of a
sufficient atmospheric density for establishing all that much of any
shield.

I also agree that the "moon reflector cant reflect back to the sending
point as the earth turns", but most importantly is that such can't even
collectively out reflect their natural surroundings to any extent
detectable by the very best of science instruments upon Earth or in
orbit. The math proves this being worth nearly zilch if not impossible
with the limited amount of such retroreflectors and dealing with the
tremendous width of laser beams as having been transmitted simply can
not demonstrate even so much as offering us anything that could be
isolated as retroreflector photons as opposed to those being common
lunar surface photons, of which there's simply millions more square
meters worth of 25% IR reflective lunar soil per retroreflector that
isn't worth one square meter. Even the most recent efforts of a
supposed 2 km zone that's providing 3.14e6 m2 as being illuminated is
nearly 4e6:1 of lunar surface that's going to entirely swamp the path
of whatever returning photons as having far too many of those lunar
surface reflected photons, and also because those retroreflectors were
not even band-pass coated, there's absolutely no viable way of
extracting which if any of the returning photons are not those derived
off the raw surface, a raw surface that's actually providing itself as
a fairly good IR reflector depending upon the spectrum of IR having
been utilized (generally the longer the IR wavelength the better off
the moon itself reflects).

Now if instead of those pathetic passive retroreflectors that were
somewhat massive for their size, if there were even a fairly broad
100mw laser deployed as a 0.1 millisecond transponder beacon, as that
we would have easily detected with our naked eye. Hells bells folks, as
little as a one joule xenon strobe performing as a remote triggered
beacon if having a one degree radian as focused upon mother Earth would
have been sufficient, and we certainly had 100 joule Xenon strobes
available that could have easily replaced those retroreflectors at not
10% the mass.

>The bull*** nasa landed in was coral calcium from guam.
Personally, at least to my interpretation it has looked almost exactly
like the sort of albedo, color spectrum as having been Xenon lamp
illuminated and as having physically reacted nearly exactly like a
50/50 blend of portland cement and cornmeal, as perhaps applied along
with or just over the surface of the "coral calcium from guam", or how
about their using the entire phosphate island nation of Nauru that's
extremely isolated and worth all of 21 km2.

I may not agree with each and every notion that you've ever proposed.
However, I totally agree with most everything you've provided in the
past and could likely post again and again about our cold-war
perpetrating government and of their NASA/Apollo fiasco. However, I
believe that you're still giving us too good of a name for what our
NASA represents to humanity. How do we go about nailing these absolute
heathen bastards?

If you'll create a few external pages that I can post links to, and in
exchange you might care to do the same on my behalf. At least in that
way we'd be supporting ourselves without our getting topic trashed and
or my having to deal with so much of their MI6/NSA~CIA PC fuckware.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~

Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord(GW Bush).
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.