Re: Brad Guth feeds the brown-nosed incest cloned clowns of usenet

tj Frazir (aka sci.physics only),
>Titanium iron oxide is royal blue.
>nasa missed the argon all together.
In addition to all of the titaniun, carbon/soot and iron deposits, it
seems they also entirely missed the horrific amounts of surface and
atmospheric sodium, of there being so much sodium that it still boils
off by day to such an extent of creating and sustaining the 14,000 km
atmosphere that's having been well proven to exist, enough sodium being
extracted that a 900,000 km comet like trail as blown by solar winds
has been yet another hard-science matter of fact.

There's so much salt that it leaves little doubt that our moon was once
upon a time a much larger sphere of an icy proto-moon, which should
also account for why all of those truly massive diameter craters were
established as being so gosh darn shallow, as though there was perhaps
originally 262 km worth of salty ice protecting the surface.

I tend to agree totally, that our NASA has been exactly the sort phony
baloney and perpetrated cold-war cloak on behalf of our MI6/NSA~CIA
daggers, as much as they were back then, and obviously still are having
to keep this to themselves, or else those men-in-black start showing
up. Our NASA is the "money laundering service" as well as a primary
disinformation resource of having created and promoted a vast arrays of
spendy BBC/NOVA infomercials, thereby having snookered the majority of
humanity, many since having been dumbfounded to their ultimate demise.

You've known for decades and I have only recently known of far too many
scientific reasons as to why our NASA/Apollo folks never walked upon
our moon. It's entirely possible that we had managed to briefly orbit
the moon in person, whereas I'm talking about a once around that nasty
sucker and then getting the hell out of that TBI dosage situation ASAP,
but I also no longer believe we've managed a robotic deploymant upon
our moon, other than for having creating a few artificial craters upon
such efforts having impacted and/or their sinking out of sight like all
of the superior robotic USSR best efforts managed to achieve.

I'm thinking that at best our NASA/Apollo crew spent the entire time
coasting within a somewhat LL1/ME-L1 station-keeping mode as offered by
the mutual gravity-well that's somewhat of an interactive zone that's
roughly 60,000 km off the deck and remains directly aligned with Earth,
sending their supposed fly-by-rocket lander in for accomplishing those
multiple orbits as unmanned, obviously having deployed itself via
remote command as for their attempting at getting this equipment onto
the surface where each of those efforts essentially impacted because we
had not devised a safe fly-by-rocket lander that could have safely
managed the task, much less protected the crew from the absolutely
horrific levels of secondary/recoil hard-X-ray dosage, nor even
offering sufficient physical protection. There's also the little matter
of their "CHAPRL BELL" signal transponder that shouldn't have been
necessary if we were actually walking upon the surface. There's also
their very own unfiltered Kodak moments that simply have not
represented the raw surface, nor as having to survive the terrably
reactive nature of our extremely albedo dark and nasty moon that
actually has a fairly complex atmosphere of sodium, argon, CO2 and deck
layer Radon that's still at best offering next to nothing of a
sufficient atmospheric density for establishing all that much of any
shield.

I also agree that the "moon reflector can't reflect back to the sending
point as the earth turns", but most importantly is that such can't
manage to collectively out-reflect their natural surroundings to any
extent detectable by the very best of science instruments upon Earth or
in orbit. The math proves this being worth nearly zilch if not
impossible with the limited amount of such retroreflectors and dealing
with the tremendous width of laser beams as having been transmitted
simply can not demonstrate even so much as offering us anything that
could be isolated as retroreflector photons as opposed to those being
common lunar surface photons, of which there's simply millions more
square meters worth of 25% IR reflective lunar soil per retroreflector
that isn't worth one square meter. Even the most recent efforts of a
supposed 2 km zone that's providing 3.14e6 m2 as being illuminated is
nearly 4e6:1 of lunar surface that's going to entirely swamp the path
of whatever returning photons as having far too many of those lunar
surface reflected photons, and also because those retroreflectors were
not even band-pass coated, there's absolutely no viable way of
extracting which if any of the returning photons are not those derived
off the raw surface, a raw surface that's actually providing itself as
a fairly good IR reflector depending upon the spectrum of IR having
been utilized (generally the longer the IR wavelength the better off
the moon itself reflects).

The first few years worth of those retroreflector infomercials having
suggested upon their achieving a 20 km diameter zone of illumination,
is one heck of a pathetic joke.

Now if instead of those pathetic passive retroreflectors that were
somewhat massive for their size, if there were even a fairly broad
100mw visible laser beam deployed as offering a 50 milliradian at 0.1
millisecond transponder beacon, as for that we would have easily
detected such with our naked eye. Hells bells folks, as little as
deploying a one joule xenon strobe performing as a remote triggered
beacon, if having a 0.5 degree radian as focused upon mother Earth
would have been sufficient, and we certainly had 100 joule Xenon
strobes available that could have easily replaced those retroreflectors
at not 10% the mass.

>The bull*** nasa landed in was coral calcium from guam.
Personally, at least to my interpretation it has always looked almost
exactly like the sort of albedo and color spectrum as having been Xenon
lamp illuminated and as having physically reacted nearly exactly like a
50/50 blend of portland cement and cornmeal, as perhaps applied along
with or just over the surface of that "coral calcium from guam", or how
about their having used the entire phosphate island nation of Nauru
that's extremely isolated and worth all of 21 km2.

I may not agree with each and every notion that you've ever proposed.
However, I totally agree with most everything you've provided in the
past and could likely post again and again about our cold-war
perpetrating government and of their NASA/Apollo fiasco. However, I
believe that you're still giving us too good of a name for what our
NASA represents to humanity ("nasa is a bunch of dumbfucks"). Next
step; how do we best go about nailing these absolute heathen bastards?

If you'll create a few external pages that I can post links to, and in
exchange you might care to do the same on my behalf. At least in that
way we'd be supporting ourselves without our getting topic trashed and
or my having to deal with so much of their MI6/NSA~CIA PC fuckware.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~

Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason of honest
folks having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been playing
by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord(GW Bush).
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Loading