Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"


jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>
> Actually, it is not mud in the water- the bulls have just swum across.
> I was preparing a measured response to PD until I came across this gem
> of avoidance and obfuscation, so *** him and his aspersions.

I'm awaiting your measured response.

>
> Did you notice how PD blithely disregards the lie he made?
> (PD): "2.5E5J which is exactly what it started with" NOT SO

Really, and what's the real answer?

>
> Q: Would not a BB suggest an origin, from which a FoR could be
> constructed?
> (My facetious comment: "Why not use the origin of BB?)
> PD: "Exactly. Not that there was one".
> (I could have sworn I have seen PD subscribe to BB as a life member!)

Allow me to refine my statement: "Exactly. Not that there was a spatial
origin of the BB."

>
> What a wonderland to live in!
> PD: "My -chosen- reference frame" ie whenever challenged on an
> observation or measurement/result, he claims immunity through jumping
> to any of HIS FoR's! lol
>
> Does this imply loss of energy?
> If c(energy) + c(energy) = <2c (energy) has a two photon system
> lost energy compared to them singly?

Nope.

>
> Could PD be SO ignorant, as to be unaware that adding velocities in SR
> involves formula describing "slopes" (speed) ??

I've asked you for a specific reference for that. You apparently can't
find it.

>
> ...and grab his final comment for your quote bag that suggests that
> even he realises SR v add is crap
>

Nope.

PD

.

Quantcast