Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:26:51 -0500
"Brablo" <gestureofrespect@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133977863.886928.256480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It's specific heat (amount of energy to raise its temperature 1 degree)
> is very high (4.184 J/K). Why isn't water, treated with something to
> prevent it from freezing used as a housing insulation as opposed to
> fiberglass? Water can even deter fires a little better.
For insulation, thermal conductivity is the important
factor, not specific heat. Lower is better.
Thermal conductivity of water is about 0.58 , as compared
to say, Styrofoam, which is about 0.033 . Even air is
better at 0.026 . Fiberglass is around 0.04 . You might
note that the number for fiberglass indicates that it
is a worse insulator than air. Air would indeed be the
superior insulator if it only transported heat by
conduction. Unfortunately, air moves around and tends to
transport heat by convection too. Fiberglass stays in
place.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- From: Brablo
- Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- References:
- Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- From: Brablo
- Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- Prev by Date: Re: pattern of electrons 4 Sam
- Next by Date: Re: H-atom wavefunctions: real or imaginary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- Next by thread: Re: Why isn't water used as a thermal-insulation?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|