taken from http://dedanoe.tripod.com/nukebook/pmpm.html

On the other hand, having in mind that physics and economy are on
parallel lines (they are formally same disciplines based on the law of
lever), how can a successful company be prompted to some 40% economic
gain (that is 140% economic efficiency) when its work is fully
dependant on machines limited to up to 60% physical efficiency? My
saying is if you are not willing to admit the existence of perpetuum
mobile machine in physics then you are not entitled to expect existence
of any perpetuum mobile business in economy. Otherwise you are
violating the most crucial scientific principle - the formal
equality.

P.S.2: *** Nobel Prize -- I'd rather have every Britihs child between
the age of 5 and 10 SLATHERED!
P.S.3: So please stay off my back or I will atack and you don't want
that -- I've got the POWER!
P.S.1: Love my self better than you I know it's right and that's what
I'll do!

.

Quantcast