Re: Earth magnetic pole shift and Global warming?


jonah.singularity@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Why Join StopGlobalWarming.org?
> Because our future depends on it. Thousands of climate scientists agree
>
> that global warming is the most urgent threat facing humanity today.
> Think Globally! Act Virtually!
>
> Michael Oppenheimer, Professor of Geosciences, Princeton - Global
> warming is the world's number one problem for the 21st century. If we
> don't deal with it now, our children will pay for it later.
>
> Walter Cronkite - I am joining the hundreds of thousands who shall be
> marching in this virtual march to demonstrate the concern that we all
> hold for the future of our planet and all the living things -- flora,
> fauna, human and animal -- that exist upon it. The governments of the
> world have tarried long enough, and the United States is scarcely
> without doubt the greatest culprit among them.
>
> R. James Woolsey, former Dir., CIA - Should you doubt that global
> warming is as serious as the overwhelming weight of scientific opinion
> indicates, think of reducing GWG (global warming gases) as buying
> insurance -- just as you pay to insure your house against fire even
> though you may discount the risk. And the rather modest premium we
> will pay to make a transition to energy systems that reduce GWG serves
> other goals as well.

Yes, the view points above should be respected however,
in view of this,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot

We use scientific logic to form a simple equation like,

d(temperature) = &(CO2) + &(Sunspots).

(& is a partial derivative).

If &(CO2)=0, it looks like &(Sunspots) accounts for Global
Warming, ie. the Sun is getting hotter and had a significant
documented effect in the past, especially when the sunspots
disappeared altogether, thus the reverse follows, ie more
sunspots => higher Earth atmospheric temperatures.

I certainly will not go to the President of the USA, with the
speculative &(CO2) when I have in hand strong evidence of

dT = &(Sunspots)

is the primary effect in Earth dT, that data acknowledges.

The president of the USA shouldn't make a major decision
to disrupt the economy of the US until we can firmly, within
reasonable doubt, provide both theory and evidence of the
&(CO2) effect.

Regards
Ken S. Tucker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Theres just no longer any credible evidence...
    ... Second, science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, ... period of slight warming. ... are rigorously calibrated to temperature data, ... Scientists, Politicians, and the Media," believes the contribution of human ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Theres just no longer any credible evidence...
    ... Hemisphere chilling of the sort that can bring on an Ice Age. ... period of slight warming. ... are rigorously calibrated to temperature data, ... Scientists, Politicians, and the Media," believes the contribution of human ...
    (alt.guitar.amps)
  • Re: Living in a state of politicized fear.
    ... warming and am slowly beginning to think that it is pure nonsense. ... Not all scientists have caved in to political pressure - ... The other elements of the global-warming scare scenario are predicated ... weather and climate science, are hardly compelling. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Living in a state of politicized fear.
    ... warming and am slowly beginning to think that it is pure nonsense. ... Not all scientists have caved in to political pressure - ... I have taken note that those scientists who claim that global warming ... weather and climate science, are hardly compelling. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Arctic Ice Melting
    ... I don't trust scientists anymore than politicians. ... Global warming sounds like a great idea to me. ... Perhaps that house that is nearly paid for will be under water. ...
    (rec.boats)